<?xml version="1.0"?>
<law><site_title>Virginia Decoded</site_title><site_url>https://vacode.org</site_url><law_id>376954</law_id><section_number>8.01-220</section_number><catch_line>Action for alienation of affection, breach of promise, criminal conversation and seduction abolished</catch_line><edition url="https://vacode.org/2026/" slug="2026" current="TRUE" last_updated="2026-08-02">2026</edition><structure><unit label="title" level="1" order_by="12" identifier="8.01">Civil Remedies and Procedure</unit><unit label="chapter" level="2" order_by="5" identifier="3">Actions</unit><unit label="article" level="3" order_by="23" identifier="21">Miscellaneous Provisions</unit></structure><text>
						<section id="A"><p><span class="prefix-number">A.</span> Notwithstanding any other provision of <span class="dictionary">law</span> to the contrary, no <span class="dictionary">civil action</span> shall lie or be maintained in this Commonwealth for alienation of affection, breach of promise to marry, or criminal conversation upon which a <span class="dictionary">cause of action</span> arose or occurred on or after June 28, 1968. <a id="paragraph-1407102" class="section-permalink" href="https://vacode.org/8.01-220/#A"><i class="fa fa-link"/></a></p></section>
						<section id="B"><p><span class="prefix-number">B.</span> No <span class="dictionary">civil action</span> for seduction shall lie or be maintained where the <span class="dictionary">cause of action</span> arose or accrued on or after July 1, 1974. <a id="paragraph-1407103" class="section-permalink" href="https://vacode.org/8.01-220/#B"><i class="fa fa-link"/></a></p></section></text><history>Code 1950, &#xA7; 20-37.2; 1968, c. 716; 1974, c. 606; 1977, c. 617.</history><metadata><court_decisions><item key="0"><name>McGrath v. Dockendorf</name><case_number>Record 160262</case_number><citation>793 S.E.2d 336</citation><date>2016-12-15</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4330252/mcgrath-v-dockendorf/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. OPINION BY JUSTICE STEPHEN R. McCULLOUGH .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr></court_html></item><item key="1"><name>Doe v. Zwelling</name><case_number>Record 050155.</case_number><citation>620 S.E.2d 750</citation><date>2005-11-04</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1058902/doe-v-zwelling/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 620 S.E.2d 750 (2005) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr></court_html></item><item key="2"><name>McDermott v. Reynolds</name><case_number>Record 992028</case_number><citation>530 S.E.2d 902</citation><date>2000-06-09</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1059592/mcdermott-v-reynolds/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 530 S.E.2d 902 (2000) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr></court_html></item><item key="3"><name>Sentara Virginia Beach General Hospital v. Lebeau</name><case_number>2:01CV242</case_number><citation>188 F. Supp. 2d 623</citation><date>2002-03-01</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2576996/sentara-virginia-beach-general-hospital-v-lebeau/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 188 F.Supp.2d 623 (2002) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>District Court, E.D. Virginia</court_html></item><item key="4"><name> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. Shiye Qiu v. Chaoyu Huang, Anna Ouspenskaya and Arlene .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </name><case_number>0459224</case_number><citation></citation><date>2023-04-18</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/9392080/shiye-qiu-v-chaoyu-huang-anna-ouspenskaya-and-arlene-starace/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr></court_html></item><item key="5"><name> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. Shiye Qiu v. Chaoyu Huang, Anna Ouspenskaya and Arlene .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </name><case_number>0459224</case_number><citation></citation><date>2023-04-18</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/9393815/shiye-qiu-v-chaoyu-huang-anna-ouspenskaya-and-arlene-starace/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr></court_html></item><item key="6"><name>William E. Raftery, Sr. v. Katheryn Girvin Scott</name><case_number>84-1052</case_number><citation>756 F.2d 335</citation><date>1985-03-07</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/449022/william-e-raftery-sr-v-katheryn-girvin-scott/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge. .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit</court_html></item><item key="7"><name>Elsie Y. Byrd v. William E. Byrd</name><case_number>81-1038</case_number><citation>657 F.2d 615</citation><date>1981-08-25</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/393689/elsie-y-byrd-v-william-e-byrd/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge: .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit</court_html></item><item key="8"><name>Wyatt v. McDermott</name><case_number>111497</case_number><citation>725 S.E.2d 555</citation><date>2012-04-20</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1057886/wyatt-v-mcdermott/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 725 S.E.2d 555 (2012) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr></court_html></item><item key="9"><name>Burns v. Gagnon</name><case_number>110754</case_number><citation>727 S.E.2d 634</citation><date>2012-04-20</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1057901/burns-v-gagnon/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 727 S.E.2d 634 (2012) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr></court_html></item></court_decisions></metadata></law>
