<?xml version="1.0"?>
<law><site_title>Virginia Decoded</site_title><site_url>https://vacode.org</site_url><law_id>376815</law_id><section_number>8.01-139</section_number><catch_line>What proof by plaintiff is sufficient</catch_line><edition url="https://vacode.org/2026/" slug="2026" current="TRUE" last_updated="2026-08-02">2026</edition><structure><unit label="title" level="1" order_by="12" identifier="8.01">Civil Remedies and Procedure</unit><unit label="chapter" level="2" order_by="5" identifier="3">Actions</unit><unit label="article" level="3" order_by="15" identifier="14">Ejectment</unit></structure><text>
						<section><p>The consent rule, formerly used, remains abolished. The <span class="dictionary">plaintiff</span> need not prove an actual entry on, or <span class="dictionary">possession</span> of, the premises demanded, or receipt of any profits thereof, or any lease, entry, or ouster, except as hereinafter provided. But it shall be sufficient for him to show a right to the <span class="dictionary">possession</span> of the premises at the time of the commencement of the <span class="dictionary">suit</span>.</p></section></text><history>Code 1950, &#xA7; 8-809; 1977, c. 617.</history><metadata></metadata></law>
