<?xml version="1.0"?>
<law><site_title>Virginia Decoded</site_title><site_url>https://vacode.org</site_url><law_id>376592</law_id><section_number>65.2-313</section_number><catch_line>Method of determining employer&amp;#8217;s offset in event of recovery under &#xA7; 65.2-309 or &#xA7; 65.2-310</catch_line><edition url="https://vacode.org/2026/" slug="2026" current="TRUE" last_updated="2026-08-02">2026</edition><structure><unit label="title" level="1" order_by="138" identifier="65.2">Workers' Compensation</unit><unit label="chapter" level="2" order_by="3" identifier="3">Application and Effect of Title</unit></structure><text>
						<section><p>In any action or claim for <span class="dictionary">damages</span> by an employee, his personal representative or other person against any person other than the <span class="dictionary">employer</span> under &#xA7;&#xA0;<a class="law" title="Protection of employer when employee sues third party" href="/65.2-310/">65.2-310</a>, or in any action brought, or claim asserted, by the <span class="dictionary">employer</span> under his right of subrogation provided for in &#xA7;&#xA0;<a class="law" title="Lien against settlement proceeds or verdict in third party suit; subrogation of employer to employee's rights against third parties; evidence; recovery; compromise" href="/65.2-309/">65.2-309</a>, if a recovery is effected, the <span class="dictionary">employer</span> shall pay to the employee a percentage of each further <span class="dictionary">entitlement</span> as it is submitted equal to the ratio the total attorney&#x2019;s fees and costs bear to the total third-<span class="dictionary">party</span> recovery until such time as the accrued post-recovery <span class="dictionary">entitlement</span> equals that sum which is the difference between the gross recovery and the <span class="dictionary">employer</span>&#x2019;s compensation <span class="dictionary">lien</span>. In ordering payments under this section, the <span class="dictionary">Commission</span> shall take into account any apportionment made pursuant to &#xA7;&#xA0;<a class="law" title="Expenses and attorney's fees in action under &#xA7; 65.2-309 or &#xA7; 65.2-310" href="/65.2-311/">65.2-311</a>.</p><p>For the purposes of this section, &#x201C;<span class="dictionary">entitlement</span>&#x201D; means compensation and expenses for medical, surgical and hospital attention and funeral expenses to which the claimant is entitled under the provisions of this title, which <span class="dictionary">entitlements</span> are related to the <span class="dictionary">injury</span> for which the third-<span class="dictionary">party</span> recovery was effected.</p></section></text><history>1994, c. 586.</history><metadata><court_decisions><item key="0"><name> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. Naa Lamiley Williams v. Capital Hospice and Companion .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </name><case_number>0947154</case_number><citation>66 Va. App. 161</citation><date>2016-03-29</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3189460/naa-lamiley-williams-v-capital-hospice-and-companion-property-casualty/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. HUMPHREYS, Judge. .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr></court_html></item><item key="1"><name>Willie Carl Emberton, Sr. v. White Supply &amp; Glass Company</name><case_number>2995033</case_number><citation>43 Va. App. 452</citation><date>2004-07-06</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1063768/willie-carl-emberton-sr-v-white-supply-glass-company/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. ROSEMARIE ANNUNZIATA, Judge. .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr></court_html></item><item key="2"><name>McKnight v. Work Environment Associates &amp; Travelers</name><case_number>0482032</case_number><citation>596 S.E.2d 573</citation><date>2004-06-01</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1063821/mcknight-v-work-environment-associates-travelers/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 596 S.E.2d 573 (2004) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr></court_html></item><item key="3"><name>Hawkins v. COM./SOUTHSIDE VA. TRAINING</name><case_number>Record 971154</case_number><citation>497 S.E.2d 839</citation><date>1998-02-27</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1059941/hawkins-v-comsouthside-va-training/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 497 S.E.2d 839 (1998) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr></court_html></item><item key="4"><name>James A. Robinson v. Trego Stone Corp &amp; NiagaraFire</name><case_number>0861972</case_number><citation>26 Va. App. 97</citation><date>1997-11-25</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1067231/james-a-robinson-v-trego-stone-corp-niagarafire/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. *99 .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr></court_html></item><item key="5"><name>Morad Eghbal v. Boston Coach Corporation</name><case_number>1128964</case_number><citation>23 Va. App. 634</citation><date>1996-12-17</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1067683/morad-eghbal-v-boston-coach-corporation/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. WILLIS, Judge. .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr></court_html></item></court_decisions></metadata></law>
