<?xml version="1.0"?>
<law><site_title>Virginia Decoded</site_title><site_url>https://vacode.org</site_url><law_id>376589</law_id><section_number>65.2-310</section_number><catch_line>Protection of employer when employee sues third party</catch_line><edition url="https://vacode.org/2026/" slug="2026" current="TRUE" last_updated="2026-08-02">2026</edition><referred_to_by><reference>65.2-313</reference></referred_to_by><structure><unit label="title" level="1" order_by="138" identifier="65.2">Workers' Compensation</unit><unit label="chapter" level="2" order_by="3" identifier="3">Application and Effect of Title</unit></structure><text>
						<section><p>In any action by an employee, his personal representative or other person against any person other than the <span class="dictionary">employer</span>, the <span class="dictionary">court</span> shall, after reasonable notice to the parties and the <span class="dictionary">employer</span>, ascertain the amount of compensation paid and expenses for medical, surgical and hospital attention and supplies, and funeral expenses incurred by the <span class="dictionary">employer</span> under the provisions of this title and deduct therefrom a proportionate share of such amounts as are paid by the <span class="dictionary">plaintiff</span> for reasonable expenses and attorney&#x2019;s fees as provided in &#xA7;&#xA0;<a class="law" title="Expenses and attorney's fees in action under &#xA7; 65.2-309 or &#xA7; 65.2-310" href="/65.2-311/">65.2-311</a>; and, in event of judgment against such person other than the <span class="dictionary">employer</span>, the <span class="dictionary">court</span> shall in its <span class="dictionary">order</span> require that the <span class="dictionary">judgment debtor</span> pay such compensation and expenses of the <span class="dictionary">employer</span>, less said share of expenses and attorney&#x2019;s fees, so ascertained by the <span class="dictionary">court</span> out of the amount of the judgment, so far as sufficient, and the balance, if any, to the <span class="dictionary">judgment creditor</span>.</p></section></text><history>Code 1950, &#xA7; 65-39; 1956, c. 534; 1960, c. 89; 1968, c. 660, &#xA7; 65.1-42; 1991, c. 305; 2004, cc. 914, 941.</history><metadata><court_decisions><item key="0"><name> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. Naa Lamiley Williams v. Capital Hospice and Companion .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </name><case_number>0947154</case_number><citation>66 Va. App. 161</citation><date>2016-03-29</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3189460/naa-lamiley-williams-v-capital-hospice-and-companion-property-casualty/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. HUMPHREYS, Judge. .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr></court_html></item><item key="1"><name> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc. v. Courtaulds Performance .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </name><case_number>Record 022244</case_number><citation>580 S.E.2d 812</citation><date>2003-06-06</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1059200/yellow-freight-systems-inc-v-courtaulds-performance-films-inc/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 580 S.E.2d 812 (2003) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr></court_html></item><item key="2"><name>Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Fisher</name><case_number>Record 010350</case_number><citation>557 S.E.2d 209</citation><date>2002-01-11</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1059388/liberty-mutual-insurance-v-fisher/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 557 S.E.2d 209 (2002) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr></court_html></item><item key="3"><name> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Allstate Insurance .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </name><case_number>211048</case_number><citation></citation><date>2022-12-08</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/9328459/hartford-underwriters-insurance-co-v-allstate-insurance-co/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. PRESENT: All the Justices .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr></court_html></item><item key="4"><name>Hawkins v. COM./SOUTHSIDE VA. TRAINING</name><case_number>Record 971154</case_number><citation>497 S.E.2d 839</citation><date>1998-02-27</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1059941/hawkins-v-comsouthside-va-training/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 497 S.E.2d 839 (1998) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr></court_html></item><item key="5"><name>Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Smoot</name><case_number>CIV.A.00-1026-A</case_number><citation>129 F. Supp. 2d 912</citation><date>2000-12-22</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2471490/michigan-mutual-insurance-v-smoot/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 129 F.Supp.2d 912 (2000) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>District Court, E.D. Virginia</court_html></item><item key="6"><name>Overhead Door Co. of Norfolk v. Lewis</name><case_number>0597982</case_number><citation>509 S.E.2d 535</citation><date>1999-01-26</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1066521/overhead-door-co-of-norfolk-v-lewis/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 509 S.E.2d 535 (1999) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr></court_html></item><item key="7"><name>Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Smoot</name><case_number>Civ.A. 00-1026-A</case_number><citation>128 F. Supp. 2d 917</citation><date>2000-12-22</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2298331/michigan-mutual-insurance-v-smoot/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 128 F.Supp.2d 917 (2000) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>District Court, E.D. Virginia</court_html></item><item key="8"><name>Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Smoot</name><case_number>CIV. A. 00-1026-A</case_number><citation>149 F. Supp. 2d 229</citation><date>2001-06-19</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2573660/michigan-mutual-insurance-v-smoot/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 149 F.Supp.2d 229 (2001) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>District Court, E.D. Virginia</court_html></item><item key="9"><name>Morad Eghbal v. Boston Coach Corporation</name><case_number>1128964</case_number><citation>23 Va. App. 634</citation><date>1996-12-17</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1067683/morad-eghbal-v-boston-coach-corporation/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. WILLIS, Judge. .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr></court_html></item></court_decisions></metadata></law>
