<?xml version="1.0"?>
<law><site_title>Virginia Decoded</site_title><site_url>https://vacode.org</site_url><law_id>376579</law_id><section_number>65.2-301</section_number><catch_line>Victims of sexual assault</catch_line><edition url="https://vacode.org/2026/" slug="2026" current="TRUE" last_updated="2026-08-02">2026</edition><structure><unit label="title" level="1" order_by="138" identifier="65.2">Workers' Compensation</unit><unit label="chapter" level="2" order_by="3" identifier="3">Application and Effect of Title</unit></structure><text>
						<section id="A"><p><span class="prefix-number">A.</span> Any employee who, in the course of employment, is sexually assaulted, as defined in &#xA7;&#xA7; <a class="law" title="Rape" href="/18.2-61/">18.2-61</a>, <a class="law" title="Forcible sodomy" href="/18.2-67.1/">18.2-67.1</a>, <a class="law" title="Aggravated sexual battery; penalty" href="/18.2-67.3/">18.2-67.3</a>, or &#xA7; <a class="law" title="Sexual battery" href="/18.2-67.4/">18.2-67.4</a>, and promptly reports the <span class="dictionary">assault</span> to the appropriate <span class="dictionary">law</span>-enforcement authority, where the nature of such employment substantially increases the risk of such <span class="dictionary">assault</span>, upon a proper showing of <span class="dictionary">damages</span> compensable under this title, shall be deemed to have suffered an <span class="dictionary">injury</span> arising out of the employment and shall have a valid claim for workers&#x2019; compensation benefits. <a id="paragraph-1406135" class="section-permalink" href="https://vacode.org/65.2-301/#A"><i class="fa fa-link"/></a></p></section>
						<section id="B"><p><span class="prefix-number">B.</span> Notwithstanding the provisions of this title, an employee who is sexually assaulted and can identify the attacker may elect to pursue an action-at-<span class="dictionary">law</span> against the attacker, even if the attacker is the assaulted employee&#x2019;s <span class="dictionary">employer</span> or co-employee, for full <span class="dictionary">damages</span> resulting from such <span class="dictionary">assault</span> in lieu of pursuing benefits under this title, and upon repayment of any benefits received under this title. <a id="paragraph-1406136" class="section-permalink" href="https://vacode.org/65.2-301/#B"><i class="fa fa-link"/></a></p></section>
						<section id="C"><p><span class="prefix-number">C.</span> Nothing in this title shall create a remedy for sexual harassment nor shall this title bar any action at <span class="dictionary">law</span>, that might otherwise exist, by an employee who is sexually harassed. <a id="paragraph-1406137" class="section-permalink" href="https://vacode.org/65.2-301/#C"><i class="fa fa-link"/></a></p></section></text><history>1982, c. 303, &#xA7; 65.1-23.1; 1986, c. 395; 1988, c. 635; 1991, c. 355; 1992, c. 469.</history><metadata><court_decisions><item key="0"><name> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. Hartman v. Retailers &amp; Manufacturers Distribution Marking .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </name><case_number>Civil Action No. 7:12-cv-00199</case_number><citation>929 F. Supp. 2d 581</citation><date>2013-03-08</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8723414/hartman-v-retailers-manufacturers-distribution-marking-service-inc/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. MEMORANDUM OPINION .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>District Court, W.D. Virginia</court_html></item><item key="1"><name>Butler v. SOUTHERN STATES CO-OP., INC.</name><case_number>Record 050022.</case_number><citation>620 S.E.2d 768</citation><date>2005-11-04</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1058908/butler-v-southern-states-co-op-inc/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 620 S.E.2d 768 (2005) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr></court_html></item><item key="2"><name>Carr v. City of Norfolk</name><case_number>Record No. 1993-91-1</case_number><citation>422 S.E.2d 417</citation><date>1992-10-20</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1325576/carr-v-city-of-norfolk/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 422 S.E.2d 417 (1992) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr></court_html></item><item key="3"><name>Shannon Conner v. City of Danville</name><case_number>1486184</case_number><citation>826 S.E.2d 337</citation><date>2019-04-23</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4612367/shannon-conner-v-city-of-danville/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr></court_html></item><item key="4"><name>M.G. v. Albemarle County Department of Social Services</name><case_number>0230032</case_number><citation>583 S.E.2d 761</citation><date>2003-07-22</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1064171/mg-v-albemarle-county-department-of-social-services/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 583 S.E.2d 761 (2003) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr></court_html></item><item key="5"><name>Beardsley v. Isom</name><case_number>Civ. A. No. 92-1294-A</case_number><citation>828 F. Supp. 397</citation><date>1993-03-10</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2351987/beardsley-v-isom/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 828 F.Supp. 397 (1993) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>District Court, E.D. Virginia</court_html></item><item key="6"><name> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. Cary O'Donoghue v. United Continental Holdings, Inc. and .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </name><case_number>1149184</case_number><citation>824 S.E.2d 519</citation><date>2019-03-26</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4603610/cary-odonoghue-v-united-continental-holdings-inc-and-united-airlines/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr></court_html></item><item key="7"><name>Hott v. VDO Yazaki Corp.</name><case_number>Civil A. 94-00064-H</case_number><citation>922 F. Supp. 1114</citation><date>1996-04-02</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1592683/hott-v-vdo-yazaki-corp/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 922 F.Supp. 1114 (1996) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>District Court, W.D. Virginia</court_html></item><item key="8"><name>Beardsley v. Isom</name><case_number>Civ. A. No. 92-1294-A</case_number><citation>828 F. Supp. 384</citation><date>1993-03-10</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8719518/beardsley-v-isom/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. MEMORANDUM OPINION .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>District Court, E.D. Virginia</court_html></item></court_decisions></metadata></law>
