<?xml version="1.0"?>
<law><site_title>Virginia Decoded</site_title><site_url>https://vacode.org</site_url><law_id>370341</law_id><section_number>56-366.1</section_number><catch_line>Proceedings to avoid or eliminate grade crossings by grade separation or to widen, strengthen, remodel, relocate or replace existing crossing structures on public highways</catch_line><edition url="https://vacode.org/2026/" slug="2026" current="TRUE" last_updated="2026-08-02">2026</edition><referred_to_by><reference>56-366.3</reference><reference>56-368.1</reference></referred_to_by><structure><unit label="title" level="1" order_by="121" identifier="56">Public Service Companies</unit><unit label="chapter" level="2" order_by="27" identifier="13">Railroad Corporations</unit><unit label="article" level="3" order_by="3" identifier="3">Extensions; Connections; Crossing Other Railroads, Roads, Etc</unit></structure><text>
						<section><p>Whenever a road in the primary or secondary state <span class="dictionary">highway</span> system or a public <span class="dictionary">highway</span> maintained by a locality (i) crosses a railroad, (ii) is projected across a railroad, or (iii) is to be so changed as to cross a railroad, or an existing <span class="dictionary">overpass</span> or <span class="dictionary">underpass</span> crossing of any such road and a railroad is in need of widening, strengthening, remodeling, relocating or replacing, and funds are (or are to be) allocated by the Commonwealth Transportation Board or public road authority for payment of the locality&#x2019;s or state&#x2019;s portion of the cost of constructing such an <span class="dictionary">overpass</span> or <span class="dictionary">underpass</span> structure or for widening, strengthening, remodeling, relocating or replacing such an existing structure, the Commissioner of <span class="dictionary">Highways</span> or representative of the public road authority may agree with the <span class="dictionary">railroad company</span> or companies involved, on such terms and conditions as he shall deem in the best interests of the Commonwealth or locality regarding the plans and specifications, the method and manner of construction and the division of costs and maintenance responsibility of any such separation of grade structure. In case of a separation of grade by structure at a new, or an existing, grade crossing, the project, except in special cases and under special circumstances to be mutually agreed upon by the Commissioner of <span class="dictionary">Highways</span>, the public road authority, and the <span class="dictionary">railroad company</span> or companies involved, shall be deemed to start at points on each side of the tracks of the railroad or <span class="dictionary">railroads</span> where the grade, under the proposed plans and specifications, leaves the ground line to go over or under, as the case may be, the tracks of the railroad or <span class="dictionary">railroads</span>.</p><p>In the event the Commissioner of <span class="dictionary">Highways</span>, the public road authority, and the <span class="dictionary">railroad company</span> or companies involved are unable to agree on (i) the necessity for the construction of such <span class="dictionary">underpass</span> or <span class="dictionary">overpass</span> structure or for the widening, strengthening, remodeling, relocating or replacing of any existing <span class="dictionary">overpass</span> or <span class="dictionary">underpass</span> structure, (ii) the plans and specifications for and method or manner of construction thereof, or (iii) the portion of the work, if any, to be done and the share of the cost of such project, if any, to be borne by each of the <span class="dictionary">railroad company</span> or companies involved, the Commissioner of <span class="dictionary">Highways</span> or the public road authority shall <span class="dictionary">petition</span> the State <span class="dictionary">Corporation</span> <span class="dictionary">Commission</span> setting forth the plans and specifications for and the method and manner of construction of such project and the <span class="dictionary">facts</span> which in his <span class="dictionary">opinion</span> justify the elimination of the crossing, the erection of a new separation of grade structure or the widening, strengthening, remodeling, relocating or replacing of an existing structure and the maintenance responsibility. Copies of the <span class="dictionary">petition</span> and the plans and specifications shall forthwith be served by the State <span class="dictionary">Corporation</span> <span class="dictionary">Commission</span> on the <span class="dictionary">railroad company</span> or companies involved. Within twenty days after service on it of such <span class="dictionary">petition</span> and plans and specifications, the <span class="dictionary">railroad company</span> or companies shall file an answer with the State <span class="dictionary">Corporation</span> <span class="dictionary">Commission</span> setting out its objections to the proposed project and the <span class="dictionary">Commission</span> shall hear and determine the matter as other matters are heard and determined by that body. The <span class="dictionary">Commission</span> shall consider all the <span class="dictionary">facts</span> and circumstances surrounding the case and shall determine (a) whether public necessity and convenience justifies or requires the construction of such new separation of grade structure or whether an existing structure is so dangerous to or insufficient to take care of traffic on the <span class="dictionary">highway</span> as to require the widening, strengthening, remodeling, relocating or replacing proposed, (b) whether the plans and specifications or method and manner of construction are proper and appropriate, and (c) what portion of the work, if any, to be done and what share of the cost of such project, if any, to be borne by each of the <span class="dictionary">railroad company</span> or companies involved (excluding the cost of right-of-way) is fair and reasonable, having regard to the benefits, if any, accruing to such railroad or <span class="dictionary">railroads</span> from the elimination of such grade crossing or the widening, strengthening, remodeling, relocating or replacing any existing <span class="dictionary">overpass</span> or <span class="dictionary">underpass</span> structure, and either dismiss the proceeding as against the <span class="dictionary">railroad company</span> or companies involved or enter an <span class="dictionary">order</span> deciding and disposing of all of the matters hereinbefore submitted to its <span class="dictionary">jurisdiction</span>.</p><p>Grade crossings shall be closed when replaced by a new public <span class="dictionary">highway</span>. However, the Commonwealth Transportation Board or the public road authority may authorize the continued use of the crossing for a period of two years following the construction of the new <span class="dictionary">highway</span> to familiarize the public with the new route.</p></section></text><history>1952, c. 398; 1996, cc. 114, 157; 2015, c. 256.</history><metadata></metadata></law>
