<?xml version="1.0"?>
<law><site_title>Virginia Decoded</site_title><site_url>https://vacode.org</site_url><law_id>361109</law_id><section_number>37.2-910</section_number><catch_line>Review of continuation of secure inpatient treatment hearing; procedure and reports; disposition</catch_line><edition url="https://vacode.org/2026/" slug="2026" current="TRUE" last_updated="2026-08-02">2026</edition><referred_to_by><reference>37.2-844</reference><reference>37.2-911</reference><reference>37.2-919</reference></referred_to_by><structure><unit label="title" level="1" order_by="85" identifier="37.2">Behavioral Health and Developmental Services</unit><unit label="subtitle" level="2" order_by="3" identifier="III">Admissions and Dispositions</unit><unit label="chapter" level="3" order_by="2" identifier="9">Civil Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators</unit></structure><text>
						<section id="A"><p><span class="prefix-number">A.</span> The committing <span class="dictionary">court</span> shall conduct a <span class="dictionary">hearing</span> 12 months after the date of commitment to assess each <span class="dictionary">respondent</span>&#x2019;s need for secure inpatient treatment. A <span class="dictionary">hearing</span> for assessment shall be conducted at yearly intervals for five years and at biennial intervals thereafter. The <span class="dictionary">court</span> shall schedule the matter for <span class="dictionary">hearing</span> as soon as possible after it becomes due, giving the matter priority over all pending matters before the <span class="dictionary">court</span>. A <span class="dictionary">continuance</span> extending the review may be granted to either the <span class="dictionary">Attorney General</span> or the <span class="dictionary">respondent</span> upon good cause shown or by agreement of the parties. Whenever practicable, the <span class="dictionary">hearing</span> for assessment shall be conducted using a two-way electronic video and audio communication system that meets the standards set forth in subsection B of &#xA7; <a class="law" title="Personal appearance by two-way electronic video and audio communication; standards" href="/19.2-3.1/">19.2-3.1</a>. <a id="paragraph-1343816" class="section-permalink" href="https://vacode.org/37.2-910/#A"><i class="fa fa-link"/></a></p></section>
						<section id="B"><p><span class="prefix-number">B.</span> Prior to the <span class="dictionary">hearing</span>, the <span class="dictionary">Commissioner</span> shall provide to the <span class="dictionary">court</span> a report reevaluating the <span class="dictionary">respondent</span>&#x2019;s condition and recommending treatment. The report shall be prepared by a licensed psychiatrist or a licensed clinical psychologist skilled in the diagnosis and risk assessment of sex offenders and knowledgeable about the treatment of sex offenders. If the <span class="dictionary">Commissioner</span>&#x2019;s report recommends discharge or the <span class="dictionary">respondent</span> requests discharge, the <span class="dictionary">respondent</span>&#x2019;s condition and need for secure inpatient treatment shall be evaluated by a second person with such credentials who is not currently treating the <span class="dictionary">respondent</span>. Any professional person who conducts a second evaluation of a <span class="dictionary">respondent</span> shall submit a report of his <span class="dictionary">findings</span> to the <span class="dictionary">court</span> and the <span class="dictionary">Commissioner</span>. A copy of any report submitted pursuant to this subsection shall be sent to the <span class="dictionary">Attorney General</span> and to any attorney appointed or retained for the <span class="dictionary">respondent</span>. <a id="paragraph-1343817" class="section-permalink" href="https://vacode.org/37.2-910/#B"><i class="fa fa-link"/></a></p></section>
						<section id="C"><p><span class="prefix-number">C.</span> The <span class="dictionary">burden of proof</span> at the <span class="dictionary">hearing</span> shall be upon the Commonwealth to prove to the <span class="dictionary">court</span> by clear and convincing <span class="dictionary">evidence</span> that the <span class="dictionary">respondent</span> remains a <span class="dictionary">sexually violent predator</span>. <a id="paragraph-1343818" class="section-permalink" href="https://vacode.org/37.2-910/#C"><i class="fa fa-link"/></a></p></section>
						<section id="D"><p><span class="prefix-number">D.</span> If the <span class="dictionary">court</span> finds, based upon the report and other <span class="dictionary">evidence</span> provided at the <span class="dictionary">hearing</span>, that the <span class="dictionary">respondent</span> is no longer a <span class="dictionary">sexually violent predator</span>, the <span class="dictionary">court</span> shall release the <span class="dictionary">respondent</span> from secure inpatient treatment. If the <span class="dictionary">court</span> finds that the <span class="dictionary">respondent</span> remains a <span class="dictionary">sexually violent predator</span>, it shall <span class="dictionary">order</span> that he remain in the <span class="dictionary">custody</span> of the <span class="dictionary">Commissioner</span> for secure inpatient hospitalization and treatment or that he be conditionally released. To determine if the <span class="dictionary">respondent</span> shall be conditionally released, the <span class="dictionary">court</span> shall determine if the <span class="dictionary">respondent</span> meets the criteria for conditional release set forth in &#xA7; <a class="law" title="Conditional release; criteria; conditions; reports; penalty" href="/37.2-912/">37.2-912</a>. If the <span class="dictionary">court orders</span> that the <span class="dictionary">respondent</span> be conditionally released, the court shall allow the <span class="dictionary">Department</span> no less than 30 days and no more than 60 days to prepare a conditional release plan. Any such plan must be able to accommodate needed and appropriate supervision and treatment plans for the <span class="dictionary">respondent</span>, including but not limited to, therapy or counseling, access to medications, availability of travel, location of residence, and regular psychological monitoring of the <span class="dictionary">respondent</span> if called for, including polygraph examinations, penile plethysmograph testing, or sexual interest testing, if necessary. Access to anti-androgen medications or other medication prescribed to lower blood serum testosterone shall not be used as a primary reason for determining that less restrictive alternatives are appropriate pursuant to this chapter. In preparing the conditional release plan, the <span class="dictionary">Department</span> shall notify the attorney for the Commonwealth, the chief <span class="dictionary">law</span>-enforcement officer, and the governing body for the locality that is the proposed location of the <span class="dictionary">respondent</span>&#x2019;s residence upon his conditional release.
			If the court places the <span class="dictionary">respondent</span> on conditional release, the court shall <span class="dictionary">order</span> the <span class="dictionary">respondent</span> to be subject to electronic monitoring of his location by means of a GPS (Global Positioning System) tracking device, or other similar device, at all times while he is on conditional release. <a id="paragraph-1343819" class="section-permalink" href="https://vacode.org/37.2-910/#D"><i class="fa fa-link"/></a></p></section></text><history>1999, cc. 946, 985, &#xA7; 37.1-70.11; 2001, c. 776; 2003, cc. 989, 1018; 2005, c. 716; 2006, cc. 698, 730, 863, 914; 2007, c. 876; 2011, cc. 42, 446, 448; 2013, c. 258; 2015, c. 662.</history><metadata><court_decisions><item key="0"><name>Johnny Ray Benefield v. Commonwealth of Virginia</name><case_number>0487243</case_number><citation></citation><date>2024-11-19</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10277227/johnny-ray-benefield-v-commonwealth-of-virginia/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr></court_html></item><item key="1"><name>Shellman v. Commonwealth</name><case_number>120261</case_number><citation></citation><date>2012-11-01</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1057809/shellman-v-commonwealth/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. Present: Kinser, C.J., Lemons, Goodwyn, Millette, McClanahan, .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr></court_html></item><item key="2"><name>Thomas v. Commonwealth (CORRECTED)</name><case_number>180764</case_number><citation></citation><date>2019-06-27</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4636315/thomas-v-commonwealth-corrected/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. PRESENT: All the Justices .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr></court_html></item><item key="3"><name>Thomas v. Commonwealth</name><case_number>Record 180015; Record 180764</case_number><citation>829 S.E.2d 534</citation><date>2019-06-27</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4633395/thomas-v-commonwealth/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. OPINION BY JUSTICE STEPHEN R. McCULLOUGH .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr></court_html></item><item key="4"><name>Lotz v. Com.</name><case_number>Record 081122.</case_number><citation>672 S.E.2d 833</citation><date>2009-02-27</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1058377/lotz-v-com/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 672 S.E.2d 833 (2009) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr></court_html></item><item key="5"><name>Com. v. Bell</name><case_number>102314</case_number><citation>714 S.E.2d 562</citation><date>2011-09-16</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1058005/com-v-bell/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 714 S.E.2d 562 (2011) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr></court_html></item><item key="6"><name>Smith v. Com.</name><case_number>091535</case_number><citation>694 S.E.2d 578</citation><date>2010-06-10</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1058175/smith-v-com/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 694 S.E.2d 578 (2010) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr></court_html></item><item key="7"><name>Gibson v. Commonwealth</name><case_number>131256</case_number><citation></citation><date>2014-04-17</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2670487/gibson-v-commonwealth/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. Present:   All the Justices .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr></court_html></item><item key="8"><name>Rhoten v. Commonwealth</name><case_number>130456</case_number><citation></citation><date>2013-10-31</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2620442/rhoten-v-commonwealth/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. PRESENT:   All the Justices .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr></court_html></item></court_decisions></metadata></law>
