<?xml version="1.0"?>
<law><site_title>Virginia Decoded</site_title><site_url>https://vacode.org</site_url><law_id>360561</law_id><section_number>36-103</section_number><catch_line>Buildings, etc., existing or projected before effective date of Code</catch_line><edition url="https://vacode.org/2026/" slug="2026" current="TRUE" last_updated="2026-08-02">2026</edition><referred_to_by><reference>36-106</reference></referred_to_by><structure><unit label="title" level="1" order_by="83" identifier="36">Housing</unit><unit label="chapter" level="2" order_by="14" identifier="6">Uniform Statewide Building Code</unit><unit label="article" level="3" order_by="1" identifier="1">General Provisions</unit></structure><text>
						<section><p>Any building or <span class="dictionary">structure</span>, for which a building permit has been issued or on which <span class="dictionary">construction</span> has commenced, or for which working drawings have been prepared in the year prior to the effective date of the <span class="dictionary">Building Code</span>, shall remain subject to the <span class="dictionary">building regulations</span> in effect at the time of such issuance or commencement of <span class="dictionary">construction</span>. However, the <span class="dictionary">Board</span> may adopt and promulgate as part of the <span class="dictionary">Building Code</span>, <span class="dictionary">building regulations</span> that facilitate the maintenance, rehabilitation, development and reuse of existing <span class="dictionary">buildings</span> at the least possible cost to ensure the protection of the public health, safety and welfare. Subsequent reconstruction, renovation, repair or demolition of such <span class="dictionary">buildings</span> or <span class="dictionary">structures</span> shall be subject to the pertinent <span class="dictionary">construction</span> and rehabilitation provisions of the <span class="dictionary">Building Code</span>. The provisions of this section shall be applicable to <span class="dictionary">equipment</span>. However, building <span class="dictionary">owners</span> may elect to install partial or full fire alarms or other safety <span class="dictionary">equipment</span> that was not required by the <span class="dictionary">Building Code</span> in effect at the time a building was constructed without meeting current <span class="dictionary">Building Code</span> requirements, provided the installation does not create a hazardous condition. Permits for installation shall be obtained in accordance with the Uniform Statewide <span class="dictionary">Building Code</span>.</p></section></text><history>1972, c. 829; 1976, c. 638; 1982, c. 267; 1986, c. 32; 2002, c. 555; 2003, c. 650.</history><metadata><court_decisions><item key="0"><name>New West Materials LLC v. Interior Board of Land Appeals</name><case_number>05CV403</case_number><citation>398 F. Supp. 2d 438</citation><date>2005-10-28</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2432556/new-west-materials-llc-v-interior-board-of-land-appeals/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 398 F.Supp.2d 438 (2005) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>District Court, E.D. Virginia</court_html></item><item key="1"><name>Rainey v. City of Norfolk</name><case_number>Record No. 1236-91-1</case_number><citation>421 S.E.2d 210</citation><date>1992-08-04</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1287278/rainey-v-city-of-norfolk/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 421 S.E.2d 210 (1992) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr></court_html></item><item key="2"><name>United States v. White</name><case_number>07-4750</case_number><citation>549 F.3d 946</citation><date>2008-12-12</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1027331/united-states-v-white/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 549 F.3d 946 (2008) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit</court_html></item><item key="3"><name>United States v. Marcus Thornton</name><case_number>02-4382</case_number><citation>325 F.3d 189</citation><date>2003-04-03</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/781516/united-states-v-marcus-thornton/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit</court_html></item><item key="4"><name>Board of Supervisors v. Miller &amp; Smith, Inc.</name><case_number>Record 790677</case_number><citation>279 S.E.2d 158</citation><date>1981-06-12</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1394906/board-of-supervisors-v-miller-smith-inc/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 279 S.E.2d 158 (1981) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr></court_html></item><item key="5"><name>Rusu v. U.S. Immigration &amp; Naturalization Service</name><case_number>01-1776</case_number><citation>296 F.3d 316</citation><date>2002-07-22</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2967620/rusu-v-us-immigration-naturalization-service/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. Petition for review denied and judgment affirmed by published opinion. Judge KING wfote the opinion, .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit</court_html></item><item key="6"><name>Arvinger v. Mayor of Baltimore</name><case_number>No. 93-2204</case_number><citation>31 F.3d 196</citation><date>1994-08-01</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7029686/arvinger-v-mayor-of-baltimore/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. Reversed by published opinion, Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Senior Judge SPROUSE .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit</court_html></item><item key="7"><name> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. Joshua Gaines &amp; Makiba Gaines v. Dept. of Housing &amp; .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </name><case_number>1090191</case_number><citation></citation><date>2020-01-07</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4692518/joshua-gaines-makiba-gaines-v-dept-of-housing-community/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr></court_html></item><item key="8"><name>Mangold v. Analytic Services, Inc.</name><case_number>94-1307</case_number><citation>77 F.3d 1442</citation><date>1996-03-12</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/714123/mangold-v-analytic-services-inc/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 77 F.3d 1442 .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit</court_html></item><item key="9"><name>Caldwell v. Green</name><case_number>Civil Action 1:06cv00063</case_number><citation>451 F. Supp. 2d 811</citation><date>2006-09-07</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2574623/caldwell-v-green/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 451 F.Supp.2d 811 (2006) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>District Court, W.D. Virginia</court_html></item></court_decisions></metadata></law>
