<?xml version="1.0"?>
<law><site_title>Virginia Decoded</site_title><site_url>https://vacode.org</site_url><law_id>345210</law_id><section_number>1-211</section_number><catch_line>Constitutional references</catch_line><edition url="https://vacode.org/2026/" slug="2026" current="TRUE" last_updated="2026-08-02">2026</edition><structure><unit label="title" level="1" order_by="1" identifier="1">General Provisions</unit><unit label="chapter" level="2" order_by="2" identifier="2.1">Common Law and Rules of Construction</unit><unit label="article" level="3" order_by="2" identifier="2">Rules of Construction and Definitions</unit></structure><text>
						<section><p>Whenever any act of the General Assembly in effect at noon on July 1, 1971, refers to any section, article, or provision of the prior Constitution of Virginia, such reference shall apply to any comparable section, article, or provision of the Constitution of Virginia then in effect unless the construction would be contrary to the legislative <span class="dictionary">intent</span> of the act.</p></section></text><history>1971, Ex. Sess., c. 49, &#xA7; 1-13.41; 2005, c. 839.</history><metadata><court_decisions><item key="0"><name>Pound v. Department of Game &amp; Inland Fisheries</name><case_number>1767023</case_number><citation>577 S.E.2d 533</citation><date>2003-03-11</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1064332/pound-v-department-of-game-inland-fisheries/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 577 S.E.2d 533 (2003) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr></court_html></item><item key="1"><name>Garraghty v. Virginia Retirement System</name><case_number>0695042</case_number><citation>608 S.E.2d 477</citation><date>2005-02-01</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1063602/garraghty-v-virginia-retirement-system/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 608 S.E.2d 477 (2005) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Court of Appeals">COA</abbr></court_html></item><item key="2"><name>Cox Ex Rel. Estate of Cox v. Shalala</name><case_number>95-2915</case_number><citation>112 F.3d 151</citation><date>1997-04-22</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2966613/cox-ex-rel-estate-of-cox-v-shalala/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. Affirmed by published opinion. Judge HAMILTON wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINS and Judge .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit</court_html></item><item key="3"><name>Reid v. Reid</name><case_number>Record 921001</case_number><citation>429 S.E.2d 208</citation><date>1993-04-16</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1289347/reid-v-reid/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 429 S.E.2d 208 (1993) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr></court_html></item><item key="4"><name> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. United States v. American Target Advertising,incorporated .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </name><case_number>00-1384</case_number><citation>257 F.3d 348</citation><date>2001-07-11</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/774036/united-states-v-american-target-advertisingincorporated-viguerie-and/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. Affirmed by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINS and Senior Judge .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit</court_html></item><item key="5"><name>United States v. American Target</name><case_number>00-1384</case_number><citation></citation><date>2001-07-11</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2967449/united-states-v-american-target/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. PUBLISHED .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit</court_html></item><item key="6"><name>Southern Blasting Services, Inc. v. Wilkes County</name><case_number>01-2098</case_number><citation>288 F.3d 584</citation><date>2002-04-29</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2967564/southern-blasting-services-inc-v-wilkes-county/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILLIAMS and .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit</court_html></item><item key="7"><name> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. Southern Blasting Services, Incorporated v. Wilkes County, .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </name><case_number>01-2098</case_number><citation>288 F.3d 584</citation><date>2002-04-29</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/777476/southern-blasting-services-incorporated-v-wilkes-county-north-carolina/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 288 F.3d 584 .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit</court_html></item><item key="8"><name>Fadely v. Commonwealth</name><case_number>Record 6482</case_number><citation>208 Va. 198</citation><date>1967-09-08</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1351294/fadely-v-commonwealth/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. 208 Va. 198 (1967) .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html><abbr title="Supreme Court of Virginia">SCV</abbr></court_html></item><item key="9"><name>David Verner Tousley v. North American Van Lines, Inc.</name><case_number>84-1226</case_number><citation>752 F.2d 96</citation><date>1985-01-10</date><url>https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/446556/david-verner-tousley-v-north-american-van-lines-inc/</url><abstract> .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. *99 .&#x202F;.&#x202F;. </abstract><court_html>Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit</court_html></item></court_decisions></metadata></law>
