{"formats":[{"name":"JSON","format":"json","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-json\/8.01-33.json"},{"name":"Plain Text","format":"text","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-text\/8.01-33.txt"},{"name":"XML","format":"xml","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-xml\/8.01-33.xml"},{"name":"HTML","format":"html","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-html\/8.01-33.html"}],"law_id":377155,"edition_id":2,"section_id":377155,"structure_id":53595,"section_number":"8.01-33","catch_line":"Equitable relief in certain cases","history":"Code 1950, \u00a7 8-518; 1977, c. 617; 2005, c. 681.","full_text":"A court shall not grant equitable relief in a suit upon a bond, note, or writing, by an assignee or holder thereof, unless it appears that the plaintiff had no adequate remedy thereon at law.\n\n","order_by":null,"text":{"0":{"id":1407736,"text":"A court shall not grant equitable relief in a suit upon a bond, note, or writing, by an assignee or holder thereof, unless it appears that the plaintiff had no adequate remedy thereon at law.","type":"section","prefixes":[""],"prefix":"","entire_prefix":"","prefix_anchor":"","level":1}},"ancestry":[{"id":53595,"edition_id":2,"name":"Actions on Contracts Generally","identifier":"2","label":"article","depth":3,"order_by":2,"parent_id":53562,"metadata":{"child_laws":12,"child_structures":0},"date_created":"2026-08-02 03:19:11","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:28:11","permalink":{"id":1507375,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":53595,"identifier":"2","token":"8.01\/3\/2","url":"\/8.01\/3\/2\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}},{"id":53562,"edition_id":2,"name":"Actions","identifier":"3","label":"chapter","depth":2,"order_by":5,"parent_id":53558,"metadata":{"child_laws":357,"child_structures":31},"date_created":"2026-08-02 03:18:33","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:28:10","permalink":{"id":1506637,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":53562,"identifier":"3","token":"8.01\/3","url":"\/8.01\/3\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}},{"id":53558,"edition_id":2,"name":"Civil Remedies and Procedure","identifier":"8.01","label":"title","depth":1,"order_by":12,"parent_id":null,"metadata":{"child_laws":1095,"child_structures":142},"date_created":"2026-08-02 03:18:32","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:28:09","permalink":{"id":1504031,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":53558,"identifier":"8.01","token":"8.01","url":"\/8.01\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}}],"structure_contents":[{"id":377076,"structure_id":53595,"section_number":"8.01-27","catch_line":"Civil action on note or writing promising to pay money","url":"\/8.01-27\/","token":"8.01\/3\/2\/8.01-27","metadata":false},{"id":377071,"structure_id":53595,"section_number":"8.01-27.1","catch_line":"Additional recovery in certain civil actions concerning checks or rejected electronic funds transfers","url":"\/8.01-27.1\/","token":"8.01\/3\/2\/8.01-27.1","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Vance v. Aetna Life Insurance","case_number":"Civ. A. 89-136-N","citation":"714 F. Supp. 203","date":"1989-06-08","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2258888\/vance-v-aetna-life-insurance\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 714 F.Supp. 203 (1989) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"}}}},{"id":377072,"structure_id":53595,"section_number":"8.01-27.2","catch_line":"Civil recovery for giving bad check","url":"\/8.01-27.2\/","token":"8.01\/3\/2\/8.01-27.2","metadata":false},{"id":377073,"structure_id":53595,"section_number":"8.01-27.3","catch_line":"Evidence in actions regarding issuance of bad check","url":"\/8.01-27.3\/","token":"8.01\/3\/2\/8.01-27.3","metadata":{"court_decisions":""}},{"id":377074,"structure_id":53595,"section_number":"8.01-27.4","catch_line":"Civil recovery for professional services","url":"\/8.01-27.4\/","token":"8.01\/3\/2\/8.01-27.4","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Ballagh v. Fauber Enters., Inc.","case_number":"Record 141248.","citation":"773 S.E.2d 366","date":"2015-06-04","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2805600\/ballagh-v-fauber-enters-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Opinion by Justice WILLIAM C. MIMS. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":377075,"structure_id":53595,"section_number":"8.01-27.5","catch_line":"Duty of in-network providers to submit claims to health insurers; liability of covered patients for unbilled health care services","url":"\/8.01-27.5\/","token":"8.01\/3\/2\/8.01-27.5","metadata":false},{"id":377093,"structure_id":53595,"section_number":"8.01-28","catch_line":"When judgment to be given in action upon contract or note unless defendant appears and denies claim under oath","url":"\/8.01-28\/","token":"8.01\/3\/2\/8.01-28","metadata":false},{"id":377105,"structure_id":53595,"section_number":"8.01-29","catch_line":"Procedure in actions on annuity and installment bonds, and other actions for penalties for nonperformance","url":"\/8.01-29\/","token":"8.01\/3\/2\/8.01-29","metadata":false},{"id":377117,"structure_id":53595,"section_number":"8.01-30","catch_line":"Procedure in actions on contracts made by several persons","url":"\/8.01-30\/","token":"8.01\/3\/2\/8.01-30","metadata":false},{"id":377129,"structure_id":53595,"section_number":"8.01-31","catch_line":"Accounting in equity","url":"\/8.01-31\/","token":"8.01\/3\/2\/8.01-31","metadata":false},{"id":377140,"structure_id":53595,"section_number":"8.01-32","catch_line":"Action on lost evidences of debt","url":"\/8.01-32\/","token":"8.01\/3\/2\/8.01-32","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Mazie Green v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC","case_number":"0144223","citation":null,"date":"2024-03-19","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/9485276\/mazie-green-v-portfolio-recovery-associates-llc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. VIRGINIA: .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Court of Appeals\">COA<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":"Mazie Green v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC","case_number":"0144223","citation":null,"date":"2024-02-20","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/9476578\/mazie-green-v-portfolio-recovery-associates-llc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Court of Appeals\">COA<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"Mazie Green v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC","case_number":"0144223","citation":null,"date":"2024-12-17","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/10293553\/mazie-green-v-portfolio-recovery-associates-llc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Court of Appeals\">COA<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"Zaletel v. Prisma Labs, Inc.","case_number":"Case No. 1:16-cv-1230","citation":"226 F. Supp. 3d 599","date":"2016-12-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/7323474\/zaletel-v-prisma-labs-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. MEMORANDUM OPINION .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"}}}},{"id":377155,"structure_id":53595,"section_number":"8.01-33","catch_line":"Equitable relief in certain cases","url":"\/8.01-33\/","token":"8.01\/3\/2\/8.01-33","metadata":false}],"previous_section":{"id":377140,"structure_id":53595,"section_number":"8.01-32","catch_line":"Action on lost evidences of debt","url":"\/8.01-32\/","token":"8.01\/3\/2\/8.01-32","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Mazie Green v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC","case_number":"0144223","citation":null,"date":"2024-03-19","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/9485276\/mazie-green-v-portfolio-recovery-associates-llc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. VIRGINIA: .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Court of Appeals\">COA<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":"Mazie Green v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC","case_number":"0144223","citation":null,"date":"2024-02-20","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/9476578\/mazie-green-v-portfolio-recovery-associates-llc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Court of Appeals\">COA<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"Mazie Green v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC","case_number":"0144223","citation":null,"date":"2024-12-17","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/10293553\/mazie-green-v-portfolio-recovery-associates-llc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Court of Appeals\">COA<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"Zaletel v. Prisma Labs, Inc.","case_number":"Case No. 1:16-cv-1230","citation":"226 F. Supp. 3d 599","date":"2016-12-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/7323474\/zaletel-v-prisma-labs-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. MEMORANDUM OPINION .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"}}}},"metadata":false,"official_url":"https:\/\/law.lis.virginia.gov\/vacode\/8.01-33\/","history_text":"<p>The record of this law\u2019s original creation isn\u2019t available online. It has been modified 2 times. Those modifications are cataloged by \u201cThe Acts of Assembly,\u201d a state publication, by year and chapter. Those modifications that can be read on the General Assembly\u2019s website will be linked accordingly. Those modifications are as follows: in 1977, chapter 617; in 2005, chapter <a href=\"https:\/\/legacylis.virginia.gov\/cgi-bin\/legp604.exe?051+ful+CHAP0681\">681<\/a>.<\/p>","references":false,"refers_to":false,"permalink":{"id":1507421,"object_type":"law","relational_id":377155,"identifier":"8.01-33","token":"8.01\/3\/2\/8.01-33","url":"\/8.01-33\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1},"url":"\/8.01-33\/","token":"8.01\/3\/2\/8.01-33","dublin_core":{"Title":"Equitable relief in certain cases","Type":"Text","Format":"text\/html","Identifier":"\u00a7 8.01-33","Relation":"Code of Virginia"},"html":"\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section><p>A <span class=\"dictionary\">court<\/span> shall not grant <span class=\"dictionary\">equitable<\/span> relief in a <span class=\"dictionary\">suit<\/span> upon a <span class=\"dictionary\">bond<\/span>, note, or writing, by an assignee or holder thereof, unless it appears that the <span class=\"dictionary\">plaintiff<\/span> had no adequate remedy thereon at <span class=\"dictionary\">law<\/span>.<\/p><\/section>","plain_text":"                                 CODE OF VIRGINIA\n\nEQUITABLE RELIEF IN CERTAIN CASES (\u00a7 8.01-33)\n\nA court shall not grant equitable relief in a suit upon a bond, note, or\nwriting, by an assignee or holder thereof, unless it appears that the plaintiff\nhad no adequate remedy thereon at law.\n\nHISTORY: Code 1950, \u00a7 8-518; 1977, c. 617; 2005, c. 681.","edition":{"id":2,"name":"2026","slug":"2026","date_created":"2026-07-16 18:40:23","date_modified":"2026-08-02 15:14:36","current":1,"order_by":2,"last_import":"2026-08-02 12:37:30"}}