{"formats":[{"name":"JSON","format":"json","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-json\/65.2-313.json"},{"name":"Plain Text","format":"text","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-text\/65.2-313.txt"},{"name":"XML","format":"xml","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-xml\/65.2-313.xml"},{"name":"HTML","format":"html","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-html\/65.2-313.html"}],"law_id":376592,"edition_id":2,"section_id":376592,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-313","catch_line":"Method of determining employer’s offset in event of recovery under \u00a7 65.2-309 or \u00a7 65.2-310","history":"1994, c. 586.","full_text":"In any action or claim for damages by an employee, his personal representative or other person against any person other than the employer under \u00a7 65.2-310, or in any action brought, or claim asserted, by the employer under his right of subrogation provided for in \u00a7 65.2-309, if a recovery is effected, the employer shall pay to the employee a percentage of each further entitlement as it is submitted equal to the ratio the total attorney’s fees and costs bear to the total third-party recovery until such time as the accrued post-recovery entitlement equals that sum which is the difference between the gross recovery and the employer’s compensation lien. In ordering payments under this section, the Commission shall take into account any apportionment made pursuant to \u00a7 65.2-311.\n\nFor the purposes of this section, “entitlement” means compensation and expenses for medical, surgical and hospital attention and funeral expenses to which the claimant is entitled under the provisions of this title, which entitlements are related to the injury for which the third-party recovery was effected.\n\n","order_by":null,"text":{"0":{"id":1406181,"text":"In any action or claim for damages by an employee, his personal representative or other person against any person other than the employer under \u00a7 65.2-310, or in any action brought, or claim asserted, by the employer under his right of subrogation provided for in \u00a7 65.2-309, if a recovery is effected, the employer shall pay to the employee a percentage of each further entitlement as it is submitted equal to the ratio the total attorney’s fees and costs bear to the total third-party recovery until such time as the accrued post-recovery entitlement equals that sum which is the difference between the gross recovery and the employer’s compensation lien. In ordering payments under this section, the Commission shall take into account any apportionment made pursuant to \u00a7 65.2-311.","type":"section","prefixes":[""],"prefix":"","entire_prefix":"","prefix_anchor":"","level":1,"next_prefix":""},"1":{"id":1406182,"text":"For the purposes of this section, “entitlement” means compensation and expenses for medical, surgical and hospital attention and funeral expenses to which the claimant is entitled under the provisions of this title, which entitlements are related to the injury for which the third-party recovery was effected.","type":"section","prefixes":[""],"prefix":"","entire_prefix":"","prefix_anchor":"","level":1,"prior_prefix":""}},"ancestry":[{"id":53546,"edition_id":2,"name":"Application and Effect of Title","identifier":"3","label":"chapter","depth":2,"order_by":3,"parent_id":53539,"metadata":{"child_laws":17,"child_structures":0},"date_created":"2026-08-02 03:18:08","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:37:27","permalink":{"id":1503287,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":53546,"identifier":"3","token":"65.2\/3","url":"\/65.2\/3\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}},{"id":53539,"edition_id":2,"name":"Workers' Compensation","identifier":"65.2","label":"title","depth":1,"order_by":138,"parent_id":null,"metadata":{"child_laws":163,"child_structures":13},"date_created":"2026-08-02 03:18:04","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:37:26","permalink":{"id":1503117,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":53539,"identifier":"65.2","token":"65.2","url":"\/65.2\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}}],"structure_contents":[{"id":376576,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-300","catch_line":"Presumption of acceptance of provisions of title; exemptions; notice and rejection","url":"\/65.2-300\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-300","metadata":false},{"id":376579,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-301","catch_line":"Victims of sexual assault","url":"\/65.2-301\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-301","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Hartman v. Retailers & Manufacturers Distribution Marking .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"Civil Action No. 7:12-cv-00199","citation":"929 F. Supp. 2d 581","date":"2013-03-08","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/8723414\/hartman-v-retailers-manufacturers-distribution-marking-service-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. MEMORANDUM OPINION .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, W.D. Virginia"},"1":{"name":"Butler v. SOUTHERN STATES CO-OP., INC.","case_number":"Record 050022.","citation":"620 S.E.2d 768","date":"2005-11-04","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1058908\/butler-v-southern-states-co-op-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 620 S.E.2d 768 (2005) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"Carr v. City of Norfolk","case_number":"Record No. 1993-91-1","citation":"422 S.E.2d 417","date":"1992-10-20","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1325576\/carr-v-city-of-norfolk\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 422 S.E.2d 417 (1992) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"Shannon Conner v. City of Danville","case_number":"1486184","citation":"826 S.E.2d 337","date":"2019-04-23","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4612367\/shannon-conner-v-city-of-danville\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":"M.G. v. Albemarle County Department of Social Services","case_number":"0230032","citation":"583 S.E.2d 761","date":"2003-07-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1064171\/mg-v-albemarle-county-department-of-social-services\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 583 S.E.2d 761 (2003) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":"Beardsley v. Isom","case_number":"Civ. A. No. 92-1294-A","citation":"828 F. Supp. 397","date":"1993-03-10","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2351987\/beardsley-v-isom\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 828 F.Supp. 397 (1993) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"6":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Cary O'Donoghue v. United Continental Holdings, Inc. and .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"1149184","citation":"824 S.E.2d 519","date":"2019-03-26","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4603610\/cary-odonoghue-v-united-continental-holdings-inc-and-united-airlines\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"7":{"name":"Hott v. VDO Yazaki Corp.","case_number":"Civil A. 94-00064-H","citation":"922 F. Supp. 1114","date":"1996-04-02","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1592683\/hott-v-vdo-yazaki-corp\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 922 F.Supp. 1114 (1996) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, W.D. Virginia"},"8":{"name":"Beardsley v. Isom","case_number":"Civ. A. No. 92-1294-A","citation":"828 F. Supp. 384","date":"1993-03-10","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/8719518\/beardsley-v-isom\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. MEMORANDUM OPINION .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"}}}},{"id":376577,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-301.1","catch_line":"Public safety officers","url":"\/65.2-301.1\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-301.1","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Shannon Conner v. City of Danville","case_number":"1486184","citation":"826 S.E.2d 337","date":"2019-04-23","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4612367\/shannon-conner-v-city-of-danville\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Cary O'Donoghue v. United Continental Holdings, Inc. and .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"1149184","citation":"824 S.E.2d 519","date":"2019-03-26","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4603610\/cary-odonoghue-v-united-continental-holdings-inc-and-united-airlines\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":376578,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-301.2","catch_line":"Employee classification; disaster; personal protective equipment not considered","url":"\/65.2-301.2\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-301.2","metadata":false},{"id":376580,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-302","catch_line":"Statutory employer","url":"\/65.2-302\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-302","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Katrina Robertson v. United States","case_number":"24-1508","citation":null,"date":"2025-07-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/10639789\/katrina-robertson-v-united-states\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1508 Doc: 48 Filed: 07\/22\/2025 Pg: 1 of 11 .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"1":{"name":"Jeffreys v. The Uninsured Employer's Fund","case_number":"Record 171467","citation":"823 S.E.2d 476","date":"2019-02-14","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4590583\/jeffreys-v-the-uninsured-employers-fund\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. OPINION BY JUSTICE D. ARTHUR KELSEY .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"Rodriguez v. Leesburg Business Park","case_number":"122029","citation":null,"date":"2014-02-27","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2654948\/rodriguez-v-leesburg-business-park\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Present: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"Moore v. Virginia International Terminals","case_number":"101408","citation":null,"date":"2012-01-13","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1057948\/moore-v-virginia-international-terminals\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PRESENT: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":"Rodriguez v. Leesburg Business Park","case_number":"122029","citation":null,"date":"2014-02-27","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2670492\/rodriguez-v-leesburg-business-park\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Present: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":"James Demetres v. East West Construction, Inc.","case_number":"14-1180","citation":"776 F.3d 271","date":"2015-01-15","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2770374\/james-demetres-v-east-west-construction-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Affirmed by published opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Senior .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"6":{"name":"MARK FIVE CONST. v. Castle Contractors","case_number":"Record 061304.","citation":"645 S.E.2d 475","date":"2007-06-08","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1058631\/mark-five-const-v-castle-contractors\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 645 S.E.2d 475 (2007) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"7":{"name":"Turf Care, Inc. v. Henson","case_number":"1810072","citation":"657 S.E.2d 787","date":"2008-03-04","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1062844\/turf-care-inc-v-henson\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 657 S.E.2d 787 (2008) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"8":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Uninsured Employer's Fund v. Monroe Henson, Jr., Windsor .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"1827072","citation":null,"date":"2008-03-04","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1062842\/uninsured-employers-fund-v-monroe-henson-jr-windso\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"9":{"name":"Princess Anne Builders, Inc. v. Faucette","case_number":"0872011","citation":"554 S.E.2d 113","date":"2001-11-06","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1064879\/princess-anne-builders-inc-v-faucette\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 554 S.E.2d 113 (2001) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":376581,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-303","catch_line":"Recovery from subcontractor; proceedings against owner or contractor","url":"\/65.2-303\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-303","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"MARK FIVE CONST. v. Castle Contractors","case_number":"Record 061304.","citation":"645 S.E.2d 475","date":"2007-06-08","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1058631\/mark-five-const-v-castle-contractors\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 645 S.E.2d 475 (2007) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":"Sites Const. Co., Inc. v. Harbeson","case_number":"Record Nos. 1866-92-4, 1867-92-4 and 1868-92-4","citation":"434 S.E.2d 1","date":"1993-08-03","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1219942\/sites-const-co-inc-v-harbeson\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 434 S.E.2d 1 (1993) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"States Roofing Corp. v. Bush Construction Corp.","case_number":"Record No. 2062-91-1","citation":"426 S.E.2d 124","date":"1993-01-19","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1307540\/states-roofing-corp-v-bush-construction-corp\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 426 S.E.2d 124 (1993) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":376582,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-304","catch_line":"Indemnity of principal from subcontractor","url":"\/65.2-304\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-304","metadata":false},{"id":376583,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-305","catch_line":"Voluntary subjection to provisions of title; effect of taking out insurance or qualifying as self-insurer","url":"\/65.2-305\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-305","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Whitlock v. Whitlock Mechanical\/Check Services, Inc.","case_number":"3072963","citation":"489 S.E.2d 687","date":"1997-09-02","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1067309\/whitlock-v-whitlock-mechanicalcheck-services-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 489 S.E.2d 687 (1997) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc. v. Courtaulds Performance .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"Record 022244","citation":"580 S.E.2d 812","date":"2003-06-06","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059200\/yellow-freight-systems-inc-v-courtaulds-performance-films-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 580 S.E.2d 812 (2003) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":376584,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-306","catch_line":"When compensation not allowed for injury or death; burden of proof","url":"\/65.2-306\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-306","metadata":false},{"id":376585,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-307","catch_line":"Employee's rights under Act exclude all others; exception","url":"\/65.2-307\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-307","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Giordano v. McBar Industries, Inc.","case_number":"111771","citation":null,"date":"2012-06-07","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1057872\/giordano-v-mcbar-industries-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PRESENT: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":"James Demetres v. East West Construction, Inc.","case_number":"14-1180","citation":"776 F.3d 271","date":"2015-01-15","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2770374\/james-demetres-v-east-west-construction-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Affirmed by published opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Senior .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"2":{"name":"Lopez v. Intercept Youth Services, Inc.","case_number":"191545","citation":null,"date":"2021-08-05","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4905465\/lopez-v-intercept-youth-services-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PRESENT: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"Butler v. SOUTHERN STATES CO-OP., INC.","case_number":"Record 050022.","citation":"620 S.E.2d 768","date":"2005-11-04","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1058908\/butler-v-southern-states-co-op-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 620 S.E.2d 768 (2005) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":"David White Crane Service v. Howell","case_number":"100981","citation":"714 S.E.2d 572","date":"2011-09-16","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1058001\/david-white-crane-service-v-howell\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 714 S.E.2d 572 (2011) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":"Napper v. ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES","case_number":"111300","citation":"726 S.E.2d 313","date":"2012-06-07","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1057861\/napper-v-abm-janitorial-services\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 726 S.E.2d 313 (2012) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"6":{"name":"Rodriguez v. Leesburg Business Park","case_number":"122029","citation":null,"date":"2014-02-27","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2654948\/rodriguez-v-leesburg-business-park\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Present: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"7":{"name":"Kohn v. Marquis","case_number":"131162","citation":null,"date":"2014-09-12","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2732505\/kohn-v-marquis\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PRESENT: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"8":{"name":"Gibbs v. Newport News Shipbuildng & Drydock Co.","case_number":"111870","citation":null,"date":"2012-11-01","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1057814\/gibbs-v-newport-news-shipbuildng-drydock-co\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PRESENT: Kinser, C.J., Lemons, Millette, Mims, McClanahan, and .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"9":{"name":"Rodriguez v. Leesburg Business Park","case_number":"122029","citation":null,"date":"2014-02-27","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2670492\/rodriguez-v-leesburg-business-park\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Present: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":376586,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-308","catch_line":"Discharge of employee for exercising rights prohibited; civil action; relief","url":"\/65.2-308\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-308","metadata":false},{"id":376588,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-309","catch_line":"Lien against settlement proceeds or verdict in third party suit; subrogation of employer to employee's rights against third parties; evidence; recovery; compromise","url":"\/65.2-309\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-309","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Allstate Insurance .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"211048","citation":null,"date":"2022-12-08","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/9328459\/hartford-underwriters-insurance-co-v-allstate-insurance-co\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PRESENT: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Naa Lamiley Williams v. Capital Hospice and Companion .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"0947154","citation":"66 Va. App. 161","date":"2016-03-29","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/3189460\/naa-lamiley-williams-v-capital-hospice-and-companion-property-casualty\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. HUMPHREYS, Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"Napper v. ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES","case_number":"111300","citation":"726 S.E.2d 313","date":"2012-06-07","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1057861\/napper-v-abm-janitorial-services\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 726 S.E.2d 313 (2012) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"United Airlines, Inc. v. Hayes","case_number":"2054104","citation":"708 S.E.2d 418","date":"2011-05-10","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1061941\/united-airlines-inc-v-hayes\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 708 S.E.2d 418 (2011) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc. v. Courtaulds Performance .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"Record 022244","citation":"580 S.E.2d 812","date":"2003-06-06","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059200\/yellow-freight-systems-inc-v-courtaulds-performance-films-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 580 S.E.2d 812 (2003) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":"Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Fisher","case_number":"Record 010350","citation":"557 S.E.2d 209","date":"2002-01-11","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059388\/liberty-mutual-insurance-v-fisher\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 557 S.E.2d 209 (2002) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"6":{"name":"Henry's Wrecker Service Co. v. Smoot","case_number":"0847004","citation":"545 S.E.2d 551","date":"2001-05-01","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1065123\/henrys-wrecker-service-co-v-smoot\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 545 S.E.2d 551 (2001) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"7":{"name":"Jeneary v. Commonwealth","case_number":"Record 002550","citation":"551 S.E.2d 321","date":"2001-09-14","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059444\/jeneary-v-commonwealth\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 551 S.E.2d 321 (2001) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"8":{"name":"Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Smoot","case_number":"CIV.A.00-1026-A","citation":"129 F. Supp. 2d 912","date":"2000-12-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2471490\/michigan-mutual-insurance-v-smoot\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 129 F.Supp.2d 912 (2000) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"9":{"name":"Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Smoot","case_number":"Civ.A. 00-1026-A","citation":"128 F. Supp. 2d 917","date":"2000-12-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2298331\/michigan-mutual-insurance-v-smoot\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 128 F.Supp.2d 917 (2000) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"}}}},{"id":376587,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-309.1","catch_line":"Creation of lien and subrogation of employer to employee's rights to recover uninsured or underinsured motorist benefits pursuant to insurance coverage carried by and at the expense of employer","url":"\/65.2-309.1\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-309.1","metadata":false},{"id":376589,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-310","catch_line":"Protection of employer when employee sues third party","url":"\/65.2-310\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-310","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Naa Lamiley Williams v. Capital Hospice and Companion .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"0947154","citation":"66 Va. App. 161","date":"2016-03-29","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/3189460\/naa-lamiley-williams-v-capital-hospice-and-companion-property-casualty\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. HUMPHREYS, Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc. v. Courtaulds Performance .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"Record 022244","citation":"580 S.E.2d 812","date":"2003-06-06","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059200\/yellow-freight-systems-inc-v-courtaulds-performance-films-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 580 S.E.2d 812 (2003) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Fisher","case_number":"Record 010350","citation":"557 S.E.2d 209","date":"2002-01-11","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059388\/liberty-mutual-insurance-v-fisher\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 557 S.E.2d 209 (2002) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Allstate Insurance .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"211048","citation":null,"date":"2022-12-08","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/9328459\/hartford-underwriters-insurance-co-v-allstate-insurance-co\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PRESENT: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":"Hawkins v. COM.\/SOUTHSIDE VA. TRAINING","case_number":"Record 971154","citation":"497 S.E.2d 839","date":"1998-02-27","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059941\/hawkins-v-comsouthside-va-training\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 497 S.E.2d 839 (1998) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":"Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Smoot","case_number":"CIV.A.00-1026-A","citation":"129 F. Supp. 2d 912","date":"2000-12-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2471490\/michigan-mutual-insurance-v-smoot\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 129 F.Supp.2d 912 (2000) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"6":{"name":"Overhead Door Co. of Norfolk v. Lewis","case_number":"0597982","citation":"509 S.E.2d 535","date":"1999-01-26","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1066521\/overhead-door-co-of-norfolk-v-lewis\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 509 S.E.2d 535 (1999) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"7":{"name":"Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Smoot","case_number":"Civ.A. 00-1026-A","citation":"128 F. Supp. 2d 917","date":"2000-12-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2298331\/michigan-mutual-insurance-v-smoot\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 128 F.Supp.2d 917 (2000) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"8":{"name":"Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Smoot","case_number":"CIV. A. 00-1026-A","citation":"149 F. Supp. 2d 229","date":"2001-06-19","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2573660\/michigan-mutual-insurance-v-smoot\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 149 F.Supp.2d 229 (2001) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"9":{"name":"Morad Eghbal v. Boston Coach Corporation","case_number":"1128964","citation":"23 Va. App. 634","date":"1996-12-17","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1067683\/morad-eghbal-v-boston-coach-corporation\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. WILLIS, Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":376590,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-311","catch_line":"Expenses and attorney's fees in action under \u00a7 65.2-309 or \u00a7 65.2-310","url":"\/65.2-311\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-311","metadata":false},{"id":376591,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-312","catch_line":"False statements, representations, etc., in connection with an award; penalties","url":"\/65.2-312\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-312","metadata":{"court_decisions":""}},{"id":376592,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-313","catch_line":"Method of determining employer's offset in event of recovery under \u00a7 65.2-309 or \u00a7 65.2-310","url":"\/65.2-313\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-313","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Naa Lamiley Williams v. Capital Hospice and Companion .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"0947154","citation":"66 Va. App. 161","date":"2016-03-29","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/3189460\/naa-lamiley-williams-v-capital-hospice-and-companion-property-casualty\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. HUMPHREYS, Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":"Willie Carl Emberton, Sr. v. White Supply & Glass Company","case_number":"2995033","citation":"43 Va. App. 452","date":"2004-07-06","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1063768\/willie-carl-emberton-sr-v-white-supply-glass-company\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. ROSEMARIE ANNUNZIATA, Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"McKnight v. Work Environment Associates & Travelers","case_number":"0482032","citation":"596 S.E.2d 573","date":"2004-06-01","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1063821\/mcknight-v-work-environment-associates-travelers\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 596 S.E.2d 573 (2004) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"Hawkins v. COM.\/SOUTHSIDE VA. TRAINING","case_number":"Record 971154","citation":"497 S.E.2d 839","date":"1998-02-27","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059941\/hawkins-v-comsouthside-va-training\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 497 S.E.2d 839 (1998) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":"James A. Robinson v. Trego Stone Corp & NiagaraFire","case_number":"0861972","citation":"26 Va. App. 97","date":"1997-11-25","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1067231\/james-a-robinson-v-trego-stone-corp-niagarafire\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. *99 .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":"Morad Eghbal v. Boston Coach Corporation","case_number":"1128964","citation":"23 Va. App. 634","date":"1996-12-17","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1067683\/morad-eghbal-v-boston-coach-corporation\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. WILLIS, Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"}}}}],"previous_section":{"id":376591,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-312","catch_line":"False statements, representations, etc., in connection with an award; penalties","url":"\/65.2-312\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-312","metadata":{"court_decisions":""}},"metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Naa Lamiley Williams v. Capital Hospice and Companion .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"0947154","citation":"66 Va. App. 161","date":"2016-03-29","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/3189460\/naa-lamiley-williams-v-capital-hospice-and-companion-property-casualty\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. HUMPHREYS, Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":"Willie Carl Emberton, Sr. v. White Supply & Glass Company","case_number":"2995033","citation":"43 Va. App. 452","date":"2004-07-06","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1063768\/willie-carl-emberton-sr-v-white-supply-glass-company\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. ROSEMARIE ANNUNZIATA, Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"McKnight v. Work Environment Associates & Travelers","case_number":"0482032","citation":"596 S.E.2d 573","date":"2004-06-01","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1063821\/mcknight-v-work-environment-associates-travelers\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 596 S.E.2d 573 (2004) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"Hawkins v. COM.\/SOUTHSIDE VA. TRAINING","case_number":"Record 971154","citation":"497 S.E.2d 839","date":"1998-02-27","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059941\/hawkins-v-comsouthside-va-training\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 497 S.E.2d 839 (1998) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":"James A. Robinson v. Trego Stone Corp & NiagaraFire","case_number":"0861972","citation":"26 Va. App. 97","date":"1997-11-25","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1067231\/james-a-robinson-v-trego-stone-corp-niagarafire\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. *99 .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":"Morad Eghbal v. Boston Coach Corporation","case_number":"1128964","citation":"23 Va. App. 634","date":"1996-12-17","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1067683\/morad-eghbal-v-boston-coach-corporation\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. WILLIS, Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"}}},"official_url":"https:\/\/law.lis.virginia.gov\/vacode\/65.2-313\/","history_text":"

This law was first created in 1994. The record of its establishment is cataloged in chapter 586<\/a> of that year\u2019s edition of \u201cActs of Assembly,\u201d the annual state publication listing all changes made to the Code of Virginia in that year.<\/p>","references":false,"refers_to":[{"id":376588,"section_number":"65.2-309","catch_line":"Lien against settlement proceeds or verdict in third party suit; subrogation of employer to employee's rights against third parties; evidence; recovery; compromise","order_by":null,"url":"\/65.2-309\/"},{"id":376589,"section_number":"65.2-310","catch_line":"Protection of employer when employee sues third party","order_by":null,"url":"\/65.2-310\/"},{"id":376590,"section_number":"65.2-311","catch_line":"Expenses and attorney's fees in action under \u00a7 65.2-309 or \u00a7 65.2-310","order_by":null,"url":"\/65.2-311\/"}],"permalink":{"id":1503353,"object_type":"law","relational_id":376592,"identifier":"65.2-313","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-313","url":"\/65.2-313\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1},"url":"\/65.2-313\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-313","dublin_core":{"Title":"Method of determining employer’s offset in event of recovery under \u00a7 65.2-309 or \u00a7 65.2-310","Type":"Text","Format":"text\/html","Identifier":"\u00a7 65.2-313","Relation":"Code of Virginia"},"html":"\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

In any action or claim for damages<\/span> by an employee, his personal representative or other person against any person other than the employer<\/span> under \u00a7 65.2-310<\/a>, or in any action brought, or claim asserted, by the employer<\/span> under his right of subrogation provided for in \u00a7 65.2-309<\/a>, if a recovery is effected, the employer<\/span> shall pay to the employee a percentage of each further entitlement<\/span> as it is submitted equal to the ratio the total attorney’s fees and costs bear to the total third-party<\/span> recovery until such time as the accrued post-recovery entitlement<\/span> equals that sum which is the difference between the gross recovery and the employer<\/span>’s compensation lien<\/span>. In ordering payments under this section, the Commission<\/span> shall take into account any apportionment made pursuant to \u00a7 65.2-311<\/a>.<\/p>

For the purposes of this section, “entitlement<\/span>” means compensation and expenses for medical, surgical and hospital attention and funeral expenses to which the claimant is entitled under the provisions of this title, which entitlements<\/span> are related to the injury<\/span> for which the third-party<\/span> recovery was effected.<\/p><\/section>","plain_text":" CODE OF VIRGINIA\n\nMETHOD OF DETERMINING EMPLOYER’S OFFSET IN EVENT OF RECOVERY UNDER \u00a7\n65.2-309 OR \u00a7 65.2-310 (\u00a7 65.2-313)\n\nIn any action or claim for damages by an employee, his personal representative\nor other person against any person other than the employer under \u00a7 65.2-310, or\nin any action brought, or claim asserted, by the employer under his right of\nsubrogation provided for in \u00a7 65.2-309, if a recovery is effected, the employer\nshall pay to the employee a percentage of each further entitlement as it is\nsubmitted equal to the ratio the total attorney’s fees and costs bear to\nthe total third-party recovery until such time as the accrued post-recovery\nentitlement equals that sum which is the difference between the gross recovery\nand the employer’s compensation lien. In ordering payments under this\nsection, the Commission shall take into account any apportionment made pursuant\nto \u00a7 65.2-311.\n\nFor the purposes of this section, “entitlement” means compensation\nand expenses for medical, surgical and hospital attention and funeral expenses\nto which the claimant is entitled under the provisions of this title, which\nentitlements are related to the injury for which the third-party recovery was\neffected.\n\nHISTORY: 1994, c. 586.","edition":{"id":2,"name":"2026","slug":"2026","date_created":"2026-07-16 18:40:23","date_modified":"2026-08-02 15:14:36","current":1,"order_by":2,"last_import":"2026-08-02 12:37:30"}}