{"formats":[{"name":"JSON","format":"json","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-json\/65.2-311.json"},{"name":"Plain Text","format":"text","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-text\/65.2-311.txt"},{"name":"XML","format":"xml","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-xml\/65.2-311.xml"},{"name":"HTML","format":"html","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-html\/65.2-311.html"}],"law_id":376590,"edition_id":2,"section_id":376590,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-311","catch_line":"Expenses and attorney’s fees in action under \u00a7 65.2-309 or \u00a7 65.2-310","history":"Code 1950, \u00a7 65-39.1; 1960, c. 89; 1968, c. 660, \u00a7 65.1-43; 1991, c. 355; 2004, cc. 914, 941.","full_text":"A\n\nExcept as provided in subsection B, in any action, or claim for damages, by an employee, his personal representative or other person against any person other than the employer, and in any such action brought, or claim asserted, by the employer under his right of subrogation provided for in § 65.2-309, if a recovery is effected, either by judgment or voluntary settlement, the reasonable expenses and reasonable attorney’s fees of such claimants shall be apportioned pro rata between the employer and the employee, his personal representative or other person, as their respective interests may appear.\n\nB\n\nIf the employer is required to institute an action against any party to recover some or all of its lien pursuant to subsection D of § 65.2-309, the employer shall not be required to pay any share of the reasonable expenses and reasonable attorney’s fees associated with that portion of its lien that is not preserved by the employee, his personal representative or other person.\n\n","order_by":null,"text":{"0":{"id":1406175,"text":"Except as provided in subsection B, in any action, or claim for damages, by an employee, his personal representative or other person against any person other than the employer, and in any such action brought, or claim asserted, by the employer under his right of subrogation provided for in § 65.2-309, if a recovery is effected, either by judgment or voluntary settlement, the reasonable expenses and reasonable attorney’s fees of such claimants shall be apportioned pro rata between the employer and the employee, his personal representative or other person, as their respective interests may appear.","type":"section","prefixes":["A"],"prefix":"A","entire_prefix":"A","prefix_anchor":"A","level":1,"next_prefix":"B"},"1":{"id":1406176,"text":"If the employer is required to institute an action against any party to recover some or all of its lien pursuant to subsection D of § 65.2-309, the employer shall not be required to pay any share of the reasonable expenses and reasonable attorney’s fees associated with that portion of its lien that is not preserved by the employee, his personal representative or other person.","type":"section","prefixes":["B"],"prefix":"B","entire_prefix":"B","prefix_anchor":"B","level":1,"prior_prefix":"A"}},"ancestry":[{"id":53546,"edition_id":2,"name":"Application and Effect of Title","identifier":"3","label":"chapter","depth":2,"order_by":3,"parent_id":53539,"metadata":{"child_laws":17,"child_structures":0},"date_created":"2026-08-02 03:18:08","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:37:27","permalink":{"id":1503287,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":53546,"identifier":"3","token":"65.2\/3","url":"\/65.2\/3\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}},{"id":53539,"edition_id":2,"name":"Workers' Compensation","identifier":"65.2","label":"title","depth":1,"order_by":138,"parent_id":null,"metadata":{"child_laws":163,"child_structures":13},"date_created":"2026-08-02 03:18:04","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:37:26","permalink":{"id":1503117,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":53539,"identifier":"65.2","token":"65.2","url":"\/65.2\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}}],"structure_contents":[{"id":376576,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-300","catch_line":"Presumption of acceptance of provisions of title; exemptions; notice and rejection","url":"\/65.2-300\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-300","metadata":false},{"id":376579,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-301","catch_line":"Victims of sexual assault","url":"\/65.2-301\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-301","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Hartman v. Retailers & Manufacturers Distribution Marking .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"Civil Action No. 7:12-cv-00199","citation":"929 F. Supp. 2d 581","date":"2013-03-08","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/8723414\/hartman-v-retailers-manufacturers-distribution-marking-service-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. MEMORANDUM OPINION .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, W.D. Virginia"},"1":{"name":"Butler v. SOUTHERN STATES CO-OP., INC.","case_number":"Record 050022.","citation":"620 S.E.2d 768","date":"2005-11-04","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1058908\/butler-v-southern-states-co-op-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 620 S.E.2d 768 (2005) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"Carr v. City of Norfolk","case_number":"Record No. 1993-91-1","citation":"422 S.E.2d 417","date":"1992-10-20","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1325576\/carr-v-city-of-norfolk\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 422 S.E.2d 417 (1992) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"Shannon Conner v. City of Danville","case_number":"1486184","citation":"826 S.E.2d 337","date":"2019-04-23","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4612367\/shannon-conner-v-city-of-danville\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":"M.G. v. Albemarle County Department of Social Services","case_number":"0230032","citation":"583 S.E.2d 761","date":"2003-07-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1064171\/mg-v-albemarle-county-department-of-social-services\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 583 S.E.2d 761 (2003) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":"Beardsley v. Isom","case_number":"Civ. A. No. 92-1294-A","citation":"828 F. Supp. 397","date":"1993-03-10","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2351987\/beardsley-v-isom\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 828 F.Supp. 397 (1993) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"6":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Cary O'Donoghue v. United Continental Holdings, Inc. and .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"1149184","citation":"824 S.E.2d 519","date":"2019-03-26","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4603610\/cary-odonoghue-v-united-continental-holdings-inc-and-united-airlines\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"7":{"name":"Hott v. VDO Yazaki Corp.","case_number":"Civil A. 94-00064-H","citation":"922 F. Supp. 1114","date":"1996-04-02","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1592683\/hott-v-vdo-yazaki-corp\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 922 F.Supp. 1114 (1996) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, W.D. Virginia"},"8":{"name":"Beardsley v. Isom","case_number":"Civ. A. No. 92-1294-A","citation":"828 F. Supp. 384","date":"1993-03-10","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/8719518\/beardsley-v-isom\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. MEMORANDUM OPINION .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"}}}},{"id":376577,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-301.1","catch_line":"Public safety officers","url":"\/65.2-301.1\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-301.1","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Shannon Conner v. City of Danville","case_number":"1486184","citation":"826 S.E.2d 337","date":"2019-04-23","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4612367\/shannon-conner-v-city-of-danville\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Cary O'Donoghue v. United Continental Holdings, Inc. and .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"1149184","citation":"824 S.E.2d 519","date":"2019-03-26","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4603610\/cary-odonoghue-v-united-continental-holdings-inc-and-united-airlines\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":376578,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-301.2","catch_line":"Employee classification; disaster; personal protective equipment not considered","url":"\/65.2-301.2\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-301.2","metadata":false},{"id":376580,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-302","catch_line":"Statutory employer","url":"\/65.2-302\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-302","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Katrina Robertson v. United States","case_number":"24-1508","citation":null,"date":"2025-07-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/10639789\/katrina-robertson-v-united-states\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1508 Doc: 48 Filed: 07\/22\/2025 Pg: 1 of 11 .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"1":{"name":"Jeffreys v. The Uninsured Employer's Fund","case_number":"Record 171467","citation":"823 S.E.2d 476","date":"2019-02-14","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4590583\/jeffreys-v-the-uninsured-employers-fund\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. OPINION BY JUSTICE D. ARTHUR KELSEY .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"Rodriguez v. Leesburg Business Park","case_number":"122029","citation":null,"date":"2014-02-27","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2654948\/rodriguez-v-leesburg-business-park\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Present: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"Moore v. Virginia International Terminals","case_number":"101408","citation":null,"date":"2012-01-13","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1057948\/moore-v-virginia-international-terminals\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PRESENT: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":"Rodriguez v. Leesburg Business Park","case_number":"122029","citation":null,"date":"2014-02-27","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2670492\/rodriguez-v-leesburg-business-park\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Present: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":"James Demetres v. East West Construction, Inc.","case_number":"14-1180","citation":"776 F.3d 271","date":"2015-01-15","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2770374\/james-demetres-v-east-west-construction-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Affirmed by published opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Senior .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"6":{"name":"MARK FIVE CONST. v. Castle Contractors","case_number":"Record 061304.","citation":"645 S.E.2d 475","date":"2007-06-08","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1058631\/mark-five-const-v-castle-contractors\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 645 S.E.2d 475 (2007) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"7":{"name":"Turf Care, Inc. v. Henson","case_number":"1810072","citation":"657 S.E.2d 787","date":"2008-03-04","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1062844\/turf-care-inc-v-henson\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 657 S.E.2d 787 (2008) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"8":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Uninsured Employer's Fund v. Monroe Henson, Jr., Windsor .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"1827072","citation":null,"date":"2008-03-04","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1062842\/uninsured-employers-fund-v-monroe-henson-jr-windso\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"9":{"name":"Princess Anne Builders, Inc. v. Faucette","case_number":"0872011","citation":"554 S.E.2d 113","date":"2001-11-06","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1064879\/princess-anne-builders-inc-v-faucette\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 554 S.E.2d 113 (2001) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":376581,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-303","catch_line":"Recovery from subcontractor; proceedings against owner or contractor","url":"\/65.2-303\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-303","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"MARK FIVE CONST. v. Castle Contractors","case_number":"Record 061304.","citation":"645 S.E.2d 475","date":"2007-06-08","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1058631\/mark-five-const-v-castle-contractors\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 645 S.E.2d 475 (2007) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":"Sites Const. Co., Inc. v. Harbeson","case_number":"Record Nos. 1866-92-4, 1867-92-4 and 1868-92-4","citation":"434 S.E.2d 1","date":"1993-08-03","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1219942\/sites-const-co-inc-v-harbeson\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 434 S.E.2d 1 (1993) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"States Roofing Corp. v. Bush Construction Corp.","case_number":"Record No. 2062-91-1","citation":"426 S.E.2d 124","date":"1993-01-19","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1307540\/states-roofing-corp-v-bush-construction-corp\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 426 S.E.2d 124 (1993) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":376582,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-304","catch_line":"Indemnity of principal from subcontractor","url":"\/65.2-304\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-304","metadata":false},{"id":376583,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-305","catch_line":"Voluntary subjection to provisions of title; effect of taking out insurance or qualifying as self-insurer","url":"\/65.2-305\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-305","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Whitlock v. Whitlock Mechanical\/Check Services, Inc.","case_number":"3072963","citation":"489 S.E.2d 687","date":"1997-09-02","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1067309\/whitlock-v-whitlock-mechanicalcheck-services-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 489 S.E.2d 687 (1997) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc. v. Courtaulds Performance .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"Record 022244","citation":"580 S.E.2d 812","date":"2003-06-06","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059200\/yellow-freight-systems-inc-v-courtaulds-performance-films-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 580 S.E.2d 812 (2003) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":376584,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-306","catch_line":"When compensation not allowed for injury or death; burden of proof","url":"\/65.2-306\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-306","metadata":false},{"id":376585,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-307","catch_line":"Employee's rights under Act exclude all others; exception","url":"\/65.2-307\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-307","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Giordano v. McBar Industries, Inc.","case_number":"111771","citation":null,"date":"2012-06-07","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1057872\/giordano-v-mcbar-industries-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PRESENT: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":"James Demetres v. East West Construction, Inc.","case_number":"14-1180","citation":"776 F.3d 271","date":"2015-01-15","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2770374\/james-demetres-v-east-west-construction-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Affirmed by published opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Senior .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"2":{"name":"Lopez v. Intercept Youth Services, Inc.","case_number":"191545","citation":null,"date":"2021-08-05","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4905465\/lopez-v-intercept-youth-services-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PRESENT: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"Butler v. SOUTHERN STATES CO-OP., INC.","case_number":"Record 050022.","citation":"620 S.E.2d 768","date":"2005-11-04","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1058908\/butler-v-southern-states-co-op-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 620 S.E.2d 768 (2005) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":"David White Crane Service v. Howell","case_number":"100981","citation":"714 S.E.2d 572","date":"2011-09-16","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1058001\/david-white-crane-service-v-howell\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 714 S.E.2d 572 (2011) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":"Napper v. ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES","case_number":"111300","citation":"726 S.E.2d 313","date":"2012-06-07","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1057861\/napper-v-abm-janitorial-services\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 726 S.E.2d 313 (2012) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"6":{"name":"Rodriguez v. Leesburg Business Park","case_number":"122029","citation":null,"date":"2014-02-27","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2654948\/rodriguez-v-leesburg-business-park\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Present: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"7":{"name":"Kohn v. Marquis","case_number":"131162","citation":null,"date":"2014-09-12","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2732505\/kohn-v-marquis\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PRESENT: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"8":{"name":"Gibbs v. Newport News Shipbuildng & Drydock Co.","case_number":"111870","citation":null,"date":"2012-11-01","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1057814\/gibbs-v-newport-news-shipbuildng-drydock-co\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PRESENT: Kinser, C.J., Lemons, Millette, Mims, McClanahan, and .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"9":{"name":"Rodriguez v. Leesburg Business Park","case_number":"122029","citation":null,"date":"2014-02-27","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2670492\/rodriguez-v-leesburg-business-park\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Present: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":376586,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-308","catch_line":"Discharge of employee for exercising rights prohibited; civil action; relief","url":"\/65.2-308\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-308","metadata":false},{"id":376588,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-309","catch_line":"Lien against settlement proceeds or verdict in third party suit; subrogation of employer to employee's rights against third parties; evidence; recovery; compromise","url":"\/65.2-309\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-309","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Allstate Insurance .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"211048","citation":null,"date":"2022-12-08","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/9328459\/hartford-underwriters-insurance-co-v-allstate-insurance-co\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PRESENT: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Naa Lamiley Williams v. Capital Hospice and Companion .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"0947154","citation":"66 Va. App. 161","date":"2016-03-29","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/3189460\/naa-lamiley-williams-v-capital-hospice-and-companion-property-casualty\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. HUMPHREYS, Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"Napper v. ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES","case_number":"111300","citation":"726 S.E.2d 313","date":"2012-06-07","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1057861\/napper-v-abm-janitorial-services\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 726 S.E.2d 313 (2012) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"United Airlines, Inc. v. Hayes","case_number":"2054104","citation":"708 S.E.2d 418","date":"2011-05-10","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1061941\/united-airlines-inc-v-hayes\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 708 S.E.2d 418 (2011) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc. v. Courtaulds Performance .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"Record 022244","citation":"580 S.E.2d 812","date":"2003-06-06","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059200\/yellow-freight-systems-inc-v-courtaulds-performance-films-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 580 S.E.2d 812 (2003) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":"Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Fisher","case_number":"Record 010350","citation":"557 S.E.2d 209","date":"2002-01-11","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059388\/liberty-mutual-insurance-v-fisher\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 557 S.E.2d 209 (2002) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"6":{"name":"Henry's Wrecker Service Co. v. Smoot","case_number":"0847004","citation":"545 S.E.2d 551","date":"2001-05-01","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1065123\/henrys-wrecker-service-co-v-smoot\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 545 S.E.2d 551 (2001) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"7":{"name":"Jeneary v. Commonwealth","case_number":"Record 002550","citation":"551 S.E.2d 321","date":"2001-09-14","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059444\/jeneary-v-commonwealth\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 551 S.E.2d 321 (2001) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"8":{"name":"Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Smoot","case_number":"CIV.A.00-1026-A","citation":"129 F. Supp. 2d 912","date":"2000-12-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2471490\/michigan-mutual-insurance-v-smoot\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 129 F.Supp.2d 912 (2000) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"9":{"name":"Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Smoot","case_number":"Civ.A. 00-1026-A","citation":"128 F. Supp. 2d 917","date":"2000-12-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2298331\/michigan-mutual-insurance-v-smoot\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 128 F.Supp.2d 917 (2000) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"}}}},{"id":376587,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-309.1","catch_line":"Creation of lien and subrogation of employer to employee's rights to recover uninsured or underinsured motorist benefits pursuant to insurance coverage carried by and at the expense of employer","url":"\/65.2-309.1\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-309.1","metadata":false},{"id":376589,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-310","catch_line":"Protection of employer when employee sues third party","url":"\/65.2-310\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-310","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Naa Lamiley Williams v. Capital Hospice and Companion .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"0947154","citation":"66 Va. App. 161","date":"2016-03-29","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/3189460\/naa-lamiley-williams-v-capital-hospice-and-companion-property-casualty\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. HUMPHREYS, Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc. v. Courtaulds Performance .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"Record 022244","citation":"580 S.E.2d 812","date":"2003-06-06","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059200\/yellow-freight-systems-inc-v-courtaulds-performance-films-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 580 S.E.2d 812 (2003) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Fisher","case_number":"Record 010350","citation":"557 S.E.2d 209","date":"2002-01-11","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059388\/liberty-mutual-insurance-v-fisher\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 557 S.E.2d 209 (2002) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Allstate Insurance .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"211048","citation":null,"date":"2022-12-08","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/9328459\/hartford-underwriters-insurance-co-v-allstate-insurance-co\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PRESENT: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":"Hawkins v. COM.\/SOUTHSIDE VA. TRAINING","case_number":"Record 971154","citation":"497 S.E.2d 839","date":"1998-02-27","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059941\/hawkins-v-comsouthside-va-training\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 497 S.E.2d 839 (1998) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":"Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Smoot","case_number":"CIV.A.00-1026-A","citation":"129 F. Supp. 2d 912","date":"2000-12-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2471490\/michigan-mutual-insurance-v-smoot\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 129 F.Supp.2d 912 (2000) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"6":{"name":"Overhead Door Co. of Norfolk v. Lewis","case_number":"0597982","citation":"509 S.E.2d 535","date":"1999-01-26","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1066521\/overhead-door-co-of-norfolk-v-lewis\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 509 S.E.2d 535 (1999) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"7":{"name":"Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Smoot","case_number":"Civ.A. 00-1026-A","citation":"128 F. Supp. 2d 917","date":"2000-12-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2298331\/michigan-mutual-insurance-v-smoot\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 128 F.Supp.2d 917 (2000) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"8":{"name":"Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Smoot","case_number":"CIV. A. 00-1026-A","citation":"149 F. Supp. 2d 229","date":"2001-06-19","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2573660\/michigan-mutual-insurance-v-smoot\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 149 F.Supp.2d 229 (2001) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"9":{"name":"Morad Eghbal v. Boston Coach Corporation","case_number":"1128964","citation":"23 Va. App. 634","date":"1996-12-17","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1067683\/morad-eghbal-v-boston-coach-corporation\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. WILLIS, Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":376590,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-311","catch_line":"Expenses and attorney's fees in action under \u00a7 65.2-309 or \u00a7 65.2-310","url":"\/65.2-311\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-311","metadata":false},{"id":376591,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-312","catch_line":"False statements, representations, etc., in connection with an award; penalties","url":"\/65.2-312\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-312","metadata":{"court_decisions":""}},{"id":376592,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-313","catch_line":"Method of determining employer's offset in event of recovery under \u00a7 65.2-309 or \u00a7 65.2-310","url":"\/65.2-313\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-313","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Naa Lamiley Williams v. Capital Hospice and Companion .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"0947154","citation":"66 Va. App. 161","date":"2016-03-29","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/3189460\/naa-lamiley-williams-v-capital-hospice-and-companion-property-casualty\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. HUMPHREYS, Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":"Willie Carl Emberton, Sr. v. White Supply & Glass Company","case_number":"2995033","citation":"43 Va. App. 452","date":"2004-07-06","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1063768\/willie-carl-emberton-sr-v-white-supply-glass-company\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. ROSEMARIE ANNUNZIATA, Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"McKnight v. Work Environment Associates & Travelers","case_number":"0482032","citation":"596 S.E.2d 573","date":"2004-06-01","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1063821\/mcknight-v-work-environment-associates-travelers\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 596 S.E.2d 573 (2004) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"Hawkins v. COM.\/SOUTHSIDE VA. TRAINING","case_number":"Record 971154","citation":"497 S.E.2d 839","date":"1998-02-27","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059941\/hawkins-v-comsouthside-va-training\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 497 S.E.2d 839 (1998) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":"James A. Robinson v. Trego Stone Corp & NiagaraFire","case_number":"0861972","citation":"26 Va. App. 97","date":"1997-11-25","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1067231\/james-a-robinson-v-trego-stone-corp-niagarafire\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. *99 .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":"Morad Eghbal v. Boston Coach Corporation","case_number":"1128964","citation":"23 Va. App. 634","date":"1996-12-17","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1067683\/morad-eghbal-v-boston-coach-corporation\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. WILLIS, Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"}}}}],"previous_section":{"id":376589,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-310","catch_line":"Protection of employer when employee sues third party","url":"\/65.2-310\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-310","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Naa Lamiley Williams v. Capital Hospice and Companion .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"0947154","citation":"66 Va. App. 161","date":"2016-03-29","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/3189460\/naa-lamiley-williams-v-capital-hospice-and-companion-property-casualty\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. HUMPHREYS, Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc. v. Courtaulds Performance .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"Record 022244","citation":"580 S.E.2d 812","date":"2003-06-06","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059200\/yellow-freight-systems-inc-v-courtaulds-performance-films-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 580 S.E.2d 812 (2003) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Fisher","case_number":"Record 010350","citation":"557 S.E.2d 209","date":"2002-01-11","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059388\/liberty-mutual-insurance-v-fisher\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 557 S.E.2d 209 (2002) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Allstate Insurance .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"211048","citation":null,"date":"2022-12-08","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/9328459\/hartford-underwriters-insurance-co-v-allstate-insurance-co\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PRESENT: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":"Hawkins v. COM.\/SOUTHSIDE VA. TRAINING","case_number":"Record 971154","citation":"497 S.E.2d 839","date":"1998-02-27","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059941\/hawkins-v-comsouthside-va-training\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 497 S.E.2d 839 (1998) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":"Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Smoot","case_number":"CIV.A.00-1026-A","citation":"129 F. Supp. 2d 912","date":"2000-12-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2471490\/michigan-mutual-insurance-v-smoot\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 129 F.Supp.2d 912 (2000) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"6":{"name":"Overhead Door Co. of Norfolk v. Lewis","case_number":"0597982","citation":"509 S.E.2d 535","date":"1999-01-26","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1066521\/overhead-door-co-of-norfolk-v-lewis\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 509 S.E.2d 535 (1999) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"7":{"name":"Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Smoot","case_number":"Civ.A. 00-1026-A","citation":"128 F. Supp. 2d 917","date":"2000-12-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2298331\/michigan-mutual-insurance-v-smoot\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 128 F.Supp.2d 917 (2000) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"8":{"name":"Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Smoot","case_number":"CIV. A. 00-1026-A","citation":"149 F. Supp. 2d 229","date":"2001-06-19","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2573660\/michigan-mutual-insurance-v-smoot\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 149 F.Supp.2d 229 (2001) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"9":{"name":"Morad Eghbal v. Boston Coach Corporation","case_number":"1128964","citation":"23 Va. App. 634","date":"1996-12-17","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1067683\/morad-eghbal-v-boston-coach-corporation\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. WILLIS, Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"}}}},"next_section":{"id":376591,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-312","catch_line":"False statements, representations, etc., in connection with an award; penalties","url":"\/65.2-312\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-312","metadata":{"court_decisions":""}},"metadata":false,"official_url":"https:\/\/law.lis.virginia.gov\/vacode\/65.2-311\/","history_text":"

The record of this law\u2019s original creation isn\u2019t available online. It has been modified 4 times. Those modifications are cataloged by \u201cThe Acts of Assembly,\u201d a state publication, by year and chapter. Those modifications that can be read on the General Assembly\u2019s website will be linked accordingly. Those modifications are as follows: in 1960, chapter 89; in 1968, chapter 660; in 1991, chapter 355; in 2004, chapters 914<\/a> and 941<\/a>.<\/p>","references":[{"id":376588,"section_number":"65.2-309","catch_line":"Lien against settlement proceeds or verdict in third party suit; subrogation of employer to employee's rights against third parties; evidence; recovery; compromise","order_by":null,"url":"\/65.2-309\/"},{"id":376587,"section_number":"65.2-309.1","catch_line":"Creation of lien and subrogation of employer to employee's rights to recover uninsured or underinsured motorist benefits pursuant to insurance coverage carried by and at the expense of employer","order_by":null,"url":"\/65.2-309.1\/"},{"id":376589,"section_number":"65.2-310","catch_line":"Protection of employer when employee sues third party","order_by":null,"url":"\/65.2-310\/"},{"id":376592,"section_number":"65.2-313","catch_line":"Method of determining employer's offset in event of recovery under \u00a7 65.2-309 or \u00a7 65.2-310","order_by":null,"url":"\/65.2-313\/"}],"refers_to":[{"id":376588,"section_number":"65.2-309","catch_line":"Lien against settlement proceeds or verdict in third party suit; subrogation of employer to employee's rights against third parties; evidence; recovery; compromise","order_by":null,"url":"\/65.2-309\/"}],"permalink":{"id":1503345,"object_type":"law","relational_id":376590,"identifier":"65.2-311","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-311","url":"\/65.2-311\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1},"url":"\/65.2-311\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-311","dublin_core":{"Title":"Expenses and attorney’s fees in action under \u00a7 65.2-309 or \u00a7 65.2-310","Type":"Text","Format":"text\/html","Identifier":"\u00a7 65.2-311","Relation":"Code of Virginia"},"html":"\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

A.<\/span> Except as provided in subsection B, in any action, or claim for damages<\/span>, by an employee, his personal representative or other person against any person other than the employer<\/span>, and in any such action brought, or claim asserted, by the employer<\/span> under his right of subrogation provided for in § 65.2-309<\/a>, if a recovery is effected, either by judgment<\/span> or voluntary settlement<\/span>, the reasonable expenses and reasonable attorney’s fees of such claimants shall be apportioned pro rata between the employer<\/span> and the employee, his personal representative or other person, as their respective interests may appear. <\/i><\/a><\/p><\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

B.<\/span> If the employer<\/span> is required to institute an action against any party<\/span> to recover some or all of its lien<\/span> pursuant to subsection D of § 65.2-309<\/a>, the employer<\/span> shall not be required to pay any share of the reasonable expenses and reasonable attorney’s fees associated with that portion of its lien<\/span> that is not preserved by the employee, his personal representative or other person. <\/i><\/a><\/p><\/section>","plain_text":" CODE OF VIRGINIA\n\nEXPENSES AND ATTORNEY’S FEES IN ACTION UNDER \u00a7 65.2-309 OR \u00a7 65.2-310\n(\u00a7 65.2-311)\n\nA. Except as provided in subsection B, in any action, or claim for damages, by\nan employee, his personal representative or other person against any person\nother than the employer, and in any such action brought, or claim asserted, by\nthe employer under his right of subrogation provided for in § 65.2-309, if\na recovery is effected, either by judgment or voluntary settlement, the\nreasonable expenses and reasonable attorney’s fees of such claimants shall\nbe apportioned pro rata between the employer and the employee, his personal\nrepresentative or other person, as their respective interests may appear.\n\nB. If the employer is required to institute an action against any party to\nrecover some or all of its lien pursuant to subsection D of § 65.2-309, the\nemployer shall not be required to pay any share of the reasonable expenses and\nreasonable attorney’s fees associated with that portion of its lien that\nis not preserved by the employee, his personal representative or other person.\n\nHISTORY: Code 1950, \u00a7 65-39.1; 1960, c. 89; 1968, c. 660, \u00a7 65.1-43; 1991, c.\n355; 2004, cc. 914, 941.","edition":{"id":2,"name":"2026","slug":"2026","date_created":"2026-07-16 18:40:23","date_modified":"2026-08-02 15:14:36","current":1,"order_by":2,"last_import":"2026-08-02 12:37:30"}}