{"formats":[{"name":"JSON","format":"json","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-json\/65.2-301.json"},{"name":"Plain Text","format":"text","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-text\/65.2-301.txt"},{"name":"XML","format":"xml","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-xml\/65.2-301.xml"},{"name":"HTML","format":"html","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-html\/65.2-301.html"}],"law_id":376579,"edition_id":2,"section_id":376579,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-301","catch_line":"Victims of sexual assault","history":"1982, c. 303, \u00a7 65.1-23.1; 1986, c. 395; 1988, c. 635; 1991, c. 355; 1992, c. 469.","full_text":"A\n\nAny employee who, in the course of employment, is sexually assaulted, as defined in §§ 18.2-61, 18.2-67.1, 18.2-67.3, or § 18.2-67.4, and promptly reports the assault to the appropriate law-enforcement authority, where the nature of such employment substantially increases the risk of such assault, upon a proper showing of damages compensable under this title, shall be deemed to have suffered an injury arising out of the employment and shall have a valid claim for workers’ compensation benefits.\n\nB\n\nNotwithstanding the provisions of this title, an employee who is sexually assaulted and can identify the attacker may elect to pursue an action-at-law against the attacker, even if the attacker is the assaulted employee’s employer or co-employee, for full damages resulting from such assault in lieu of pursuing benefits under this title, and upon repayment of any benefits received under this title.\n\nC\n\nNothing in this title shall create a remedy for sexual harassment nor shall this title bar any action at law, that might otherwise exist, by an employee who is sexually harassed.\n\n","order_by":null,"text":{"0":{"id":1406135,"text":"Any employee who, in the course of employment, is sexually assaulted, as defined in §§ 18.2-61, 18.2-67.1, 18.2-67.3, or § 18.2-67.4, and promptly reports the assault to the appropriate law-enforcement authority, where the nature of such employment substantially increases the risk of such assault, upon a proper showing of damages compensable under this title, shall be deemed to have suffered an injury arising out of the employment and shall have a valid claim for workers’ compensation benefits.","type":"section","prefixes":["A"],"prefix":"A","entire_prefix":"A","prefix_anchor":"A","level":1,"next_prefix":"B"},"1":{"id":1406136,"text":"Notwithstanding the provisions of this title, an employee who is sexually assaulted and can identify the attacker may elect to pursue an action-at-law against the attacker, even if the attacker is the assaulted employee’s employer or co-employee, for full damages resulting from such assault in lieu of pursuing benefits under this title, and upon repayment of any benefits received under this title.","type":"section","prefixes":["B"],"prefix":"B","entire_prefix":"B","prefix_anchor":"B","level":1,"prior_prefix":"A","next_prefix":"C"},"2":{"id":1406137,"text":"Nothing in this title shall create a remedy for sexual harassment nor shall this title bar any action at law, that might otherwise exist, by an employee who is sexually harassed.","type":"section","prefixes":["C"],"prefix":"C","entire_prefix":"C","prefix_anchor":"C","level":1,"prior_prefix":"B"}},"ancestry":[{"id":53546,"edition_id":2,"name":"Application and Effect of Title","identifier":"3","label":"chapter","depth":2,"order_by":3,"parent_id":53539,"metadata":{"child_laws":17,"child_structures":0},"date_created":"2026-08-02 03:18:08","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:37:27","permalink":{"id":1503287,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":53546,"identifier":"3","token":"65.2\/3","url":"\/65.2\/3\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}},{"id":53539,"edition_id":2,"name":"Workers' Compensation","identifier":"65.2","label":"title","depth":1,"order_by":138,"parent_id":null,"metadata":{"child_laws":163,"child_structures":13},"date_created":"2026-08-02 03:18:04","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:37:26","permalink":{"id":1503117,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":53539,"identifier":"65.2","token":"65.2","url":"\/65.2\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}}],"structure_contents":[{"id":376576,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-300","catch_line":"Presumption of acceptance of provisions of title; exemptions; notice and rejection","url":"\/65.2-300\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-300","metadata":false},{"id":376579,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-301","catch_line":"Victims of sexual assault","url":"\/65.2-301\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-301","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Hartman v. Retailers & Manufacturers Distribution Marking .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"Civil Action No. 7:12-cv-00199","citation":"929 F. Supp. 2d 581","date":"2013-03-08","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/8723414\/hartman-v-retailers-manufacturers-distribution-marking-service-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. MEMORANDUM OPINION .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, W.D. Virginia"},"1":{"name":"Butler v. SOUTHERN STATES CO-OP., INC.","case_number":"Record 050022.","citation":"620 S.E.2d 768","date":"2005-11-04","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1058908\/butler-v-southern-states-co-op-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 620 S.E.2d 768 (2005) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"Carr v. City of Norfolk","case_number":"Record No. 1993-91-1","citation":"422 S.E.2d 417","date":"1992-10-20","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1325576\/carr-v-city-of-norfolk\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 422 S.E.2d 417 (1992) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"Shannon Conner v. City of Danville","case_number":"1486184","citation":"826 S.E.2d 337","date":"2019-04-23","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4612367\/shannon-conner-v-city-of-danville\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":"M.G. v. Albemarle County Department of Social Services","case_number":"0230032","citation":"583 S.E.2d 761","date":"2003-07-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1064171\/mg-v-albemarle-county-department-of-social-services\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 583 S.E.2d 761 (2003) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":"Beardsley v. Isom","case_number":"Civ. A. No. 92-1294-A","citation":"828 F. Supp. 397","date":"1993-03-10","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2351987\/beardsley-v-isom\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 828 F.Supp. 397 (1993) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"6":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Cary O'Donoghue v. United Continental Holdings, Inc. and .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"1149184","citation":"824 S.E.2d 519","date":"2019-03-26","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4603610\/cary-odonoghue-v-united-continental-holdings-inc-and-united-airlines\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"7":{"name":"Hott v. VDO Yazaki Corp.","case_number":"Civil A. 94-00064-H","citation":"922 F. Supp. 1114","date":"1996-04-02","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1592683\/hott-v-vdo-yazaki-corp\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 922 F.Supp. 1114 (1996) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, W.D. Virginia"},"8":{"name":"Beardsley v. Isom","case_number":"Civ. A. No. 92-1294-A","citation":"828 F. Supp. 384","date":"1993-03-10","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/8719518\/beardsley-v-isom\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. MEMORANDUM OPINION .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"}}}},{"id":376577,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-301.1","catch_line":"Public safety officers","url":"\/65.2-301.1\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-301.1","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Shannon Conner v. City of Danville","case_number":"1486184","citation":"826 S.E.2d 337","date":"2019-04-23","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4612367\/shannon-conner-v-city-of-danville\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Cary O'Donoghue v. United Continental Holdings, Inc. and .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"1149184","citation":"824 S.E.2d 519","date":"2019-03-26","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4603610\/cary-odonoghue-v-united-continental-holdings-inc-and-united-airlines\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":376578,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-301.2","catch_line":"Employee classification; disaster; personal protective equipment not considered","url":"\/65.2-301.2\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-301.2","metadata":false},{"id":376580,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-302","catch_line":"Statutory employer","url":"\/65.2-302\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-302","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Katrina Robertson v. United States","case_number":"24-1508","citation":null,"date":"2025-07-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/10639789\/katrina-robertson-v-united-states\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1508 Doc: 48 Filed: 07\/22\/2025 Pg: 1 of 11 .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"1":{"name":"Jeffreys v. The Uninsured Employer's Fund","case_number":"Record 171467","citation":"823 S.E.2d 476","date":"2019-02-14","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4590583\/jeffreys-v-the-uninsured-employers-fund\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. OPINION BY JUSTICE D. ARTHUR KELSEY .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"Rodriguez v. Leesburg Business Park","case_number":"122029","citation":null,"date":"2014-02-27","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2654948\/rodriguez-v-leesburg-business-park\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Present: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"Moore v. Virginia International Terminals","case_number":"101408","citation":null,"date":"2012-01-13","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1057948\/moore-v-virginia-international-terminals\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PRESENT: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":"Rodriguez v. Leesburg Business Park","case_number":"122029","citation":null,"date":"2014-02-27","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2670492\/rodriguez-v-leesburg-business-park\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Present: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":"James Demetres v. East West Construction, Inc.","case_number":"14-1180","citation":"776 F.3d 271","date":"2015-01-15","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2770374\/james-demetres-v-east-west-construction-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Affirmed by published opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Senior .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"6":{"name":"MARK FIVE CONST. v. Castle Contractors","case_number":"Record 061304.","citation":"645 S.E.2d 475","date":"2007-06-08","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1058631\/mark-five-const-v-castle-contractors\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 645 S.E.2d 475 (2007) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"7":{"name":"Turf Care, Inc. v. Henson","case_number":"1810072","citation":"657 S.E.2d 787","date":"2008-03-04","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1062844\/turf-care-inc-v-henson\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 657 S.E.2d 787 (2008) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"8":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Uninsured Employer's Fund v. Monroe Henson, Jr., Windsor .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"1827072","citation":null,"date":"2008-03-04","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1062842\/uninsured-employers-fund-v-monroe-henson-jr-windso\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"9":{"name":"Princess Anne Builders, Inc. v. Faucette","case_number":"0872011","citation":"554 S.E.2d 113","date":"2001-11-06","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1064879\/princess-anne-builders-inc-v-faucette\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 554 S.E.2d 113 (2001) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":376581,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-303","catch_line":"Recovery from subcontractor; proceedings against owner or contractor","url":"\/65.2-303\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-303","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"MARK FIVE CONST. v. Castle Contractors","case_number":"Record 061304.","citation":"645 S.E.2d 475","date":"2007-06-08","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1058631\/mark-five-const-v-castle-contractors\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 645 S.E.2d 475 (2007) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":"Sites Const. Co., Inc. v. Harbeson","case_number":"Record Nos. 1866-92-4, 1867-92-4 and 1868-92-4","citation":"434 S.E.2d 1","date":"1993-08-03","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1219942\/sites-const-co-inc-v-harbeson\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 434 S.E.2d 1 (1993) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"States Roofing Corp. v. Bush Construction Corp.","case_number":"Record No. 2062-91-1","citation":"426 S.E.2d 124","date":"1993-01-19","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1307540\/states-roofing-corp-v-bush-construction-corp\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 426 S.E.2d 124 (1993) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":376582,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-304","catch_line":"Indemnity of principal from subcontractor","url":"\/65.2-304\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-304","metadata":false},{"id":376583,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-305","catch_line":"Voluntary subjection to provisions of title; effect of taking out insurance or qualifying as self-insurer","url":"\/65.2-305\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-305","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Whitlock v. Whitlock Mechanical\/Check Services, Inc.","case_number":"3072963","citation":"489 S.E.2d 687","date":"1997-09-02","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1067309\/whitlock-v-whitlock-mechanicalcheck-services-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 489 S.E.2d 687 (1997) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc. v. Courtaulds Performance .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"Record 022244","citation":"580 S.E.2d 812","date":"2003-06-06","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059200\/yellow-freight-systems-inc-v-courtaulds-performance-films-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 580 S.E.2d 812 (2003) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":376584,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-306","catch_line":"When compensation not allowed for injury or death; burden of proof","url":"\/65.2-306\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-306","metadata":false},{"id":376585,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-307","catch_line":"Employee's rights under Act exclude all others; exception","url":"\/65.2-307\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-307","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Giordano v. McBar Industries, Inc.","case_number":"111771","citation":null,"date":"2012-06-07","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1057872\/giordano-v-mcbar-industries-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PRESENT: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":"James Demetres v. East West Construction, Inc.","case_number":"14-1180","citation":"776 F.3d 271","date":"2015-01-15","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2770374\/james-demetres-v-east-west-construction-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Affirmed by published opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Senior .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"2":{"name":"Lopez v. Intercept Youth Services, Inc.","case_number":"191545","citation":null,"date":"2021-08-05","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4905465\/lopez-v-intercept-youth-services-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PRESENT: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"Butler v. SOUTHERN STATES CO-OP., INC.","case_number":"Record 050022.","citation":"620 S.E.2d 768","date":"2005-11-04","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1058908\/butler-v-southern-states-co-op-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 620 S.E.2d 768 (2005) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":"David White Crane Service v. Howell","case_number":"100981","citation":"714 S.E.2d 572","date":"2011-09-16","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1058001\/david-white-crane-service-v-howell\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 714 S.E.2d 572 (2011) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":"Napper v. ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES","case_number":"111300","citation":"726 S.E.2d 313","date":"2012-06-07","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1057861\/napper-v-abm-janitorial-services\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 726 S.E.2d 313 (2012) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"6":{"name":"Rodriguez v. Leesburg Business Park","case_number":"122029","citation":null,"date":"2014-02-27","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2654948\/rodriguez-v-leesburg-business-park\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Present: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"7":{"name":"Kohn v. Marquis","case_number":"131162","citation":null,"date":"2014-09-12","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2732505\/kohn-v-marquis\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PRESENT: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"8":{"name":"Gibbs v. Newport News Shipbuildng & Drydock Co.","case_number":"111870","citation":null,"date":"2012-11-01","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1057814\/gibbs-v-newport-news-shipbuildng-drydock-co\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PRESENT: Kinser, C.J., Lemons, Millette, Mims, McClanahan, and .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"9":{"name":"Rodriguez v. Leesburg Business Park","case_number":"122029","citation":null,"date":"2014-02-27","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2670492\/rodriguez-v-leesburg-business-park\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Present: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":376586,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-308","catch_line":"Discharge of employee for exercising rights prohibited; civil action; relief","url":"\/65.2-308\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-308","metadata":false},{"id":376588,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-309","catch_line":"Lien against settlement proceeds or verdict in third party suit; subrogation of employer to employee's rights against third parties; evidence; recovery; compromise","url":"\/65.2-309\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-309","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Allstate Insurance .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"211048","citation":null,"date":"2022-12-08","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/9328459\/hartford-underwriters-insurance-co-v-allstate-insurance-co\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PRESENT: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Naa Lamiley Williams v. Capital Hospice and Companion .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"0947154","citation":"66 Va. App. 161","date":"2016-03-29","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/3189460\/naa-lamiley-williams-v-capital-hospice-and-companion-property-casualty\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. HUMPHREYS, Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"Napper v. ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES","case_number":"111300","citation":"726 S.E.2d 313","date":"2012-06-07","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1057861\/napper-v-abm-janitorial-services\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 726 S.E.2d 313 (2012) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"United Airlines, Inc. v. Hayes","case_number":"2054104","citation":"708 S.E.2d 418","date":"2011-05-10","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1061941\/united-airlines-inc-v-hayes\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 708 S.E.2d 418 (2011) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc. v. Courtaulds Performance .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"Record 022244","citation":"580 S.E.2d 812","date":"2003-06-06","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059200\/yellow-freight-systems-inc-v-courtaulds-performance-films-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 580 S.E.2d 812 (2003) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":"Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Fisher","case_number":"Record 010350","citation":"557 S.E.2d 209","date":"2002-01-11","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059388\/liberty-mutual-insurance-v-fisher\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 557 S.E.2d 209 (2002) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"6":{"name":"Henry's Wrecker Service Co. v. Smoot","case_number":"0847004","citation":"545 S.E.2d 551","date":"2001-05-01","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1065123\/henrys-wrecker-service-co-v-smoot\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 545 S.E.2d 551 (2001) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"7":{"name":"Jeneary v. Commonwealth","case_number":"Record 002550","citation":"551 S.E.2d 321","date":"2001-09-14","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059444\/jeneary-v-commonwealth\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 551 S.E.2d 321 (2001) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"8":{"name":"Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Smoot","case_number":"CIV.A.00-1026-A","citation":"129 F. Supp. 2d 912","date":"2000-12-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2471490\/michigan-mutual-insurance-v-smoot\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 129 F.Supp.2d 912 (2000) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"9":{"name":"Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Smoot","case_number":"Civ.A. 00-1026-A","citation":"128 F. Supp. 2d 917","date":"2000-12-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2298331\/michigan-mutual-insurance-v-smoot\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 128 F.Supp.2d 917 (2000) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"}}}},{"id":376587,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-309.1","catch_line":"Creation of lien and subrogation of employer to employee's rights to recover uninsured or underinsured motorist benefits pursuant to insurance coverage carried by and at the expense of employer","url":"\/65.2-309.1\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-309.1","metadata":false},{"id":376589,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-310","catch_line":"Protection of employer when employee sues third party","url":"\/65.2-310\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-310","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Naa Lamiley Williams v. Capital Hospice and Companion .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"0947154","citation":"66 Va. App. 161","date":"2016-03-29","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/3189460\/naa-lamiley-williams-v-capital-hospice-and-companion-property-casualty\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. HUMPHREYS, Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc. v. Courtaulds Performance .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"Record 022244","citation":"580 S.E.2d 812","date":"2003-06-06","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059200\/yellow-freight-systems-inc-v-courtaulds-performance-films-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 580 S.E.2d 812 (2003) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Fisher","case_number":"Record 010350","citation":"557 S.E.2d 209","date":"2002-01-11","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059388\/liberty-mutual-insurance-v-fisher\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 557 S.E.2d 209 (2002) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Allstate Insurance .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"211048","citation":null,"date":"2022-12-08","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/9328459\/hartford-underwriters-insurance-co-v-allstate-insurance-co\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PRESENT: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":"Hawkins v. COM.\/SOUTHSIDE VA. TRAINING","case_number":"Record 971154","citation":"497 S.E.2d 839","date":"1998-02-27","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059941\/hawkins-v-comsouthside-va-training\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 497 S.E.2d 839 (1998) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":"Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Smoot","case_number":"CIV.A.00-1026-A","citation":"129 F. Supp. 2d 912","date":"2000-12-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2471490\/michigan-mutual-insurance-v-smoot\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 129 F.Supp.2d 912 (2000) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"6":{"name":"Overhead Door Co. of Norfolk v. Lewis","case_number":"0597982","citation":"509 S.E.2d 535","date":"1999-01-26","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1066521\/overhead-door-co-of-norfolk-v-lewis\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 509 S.E.2d 535 (1999) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"7":{"name":"Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Smoot","case_number":"Civ.A. 00-1026-A","citation":"128 F. Supp. 2d 917","date":"2000-12-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2298331\/michigan-mutual-insurance-v-smoot\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 128 F.Supp.2d 917 (2000) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"8":{"name":"Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Smoot","case_number":"CIV. A. 00-1026-A","citation":"149 F. Supp. 2d 229","date":"2001-06-19","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2573660\/michigan-mutual-insurance-v-smoot\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 149 F.Supp.2d 229 (2001) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"9":{"name":"Morad Eghbal v. Boston Coach Corporation","case_number":"1128964","citation":"23 Va. App. 634","date":"1996-12-17","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1067683\/morad-eghbal-v-boston-coach-corporation\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. WILLIS, Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":376590,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-311","catch_line":"Expenses and attorney's fees in action under \u00a7 65.2-309 or \u00a7 65.2-310","url":"\/65.2-311\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-311","metadata":false},{"id":376591,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-312","catch_line":"False statements, representations, etc., in connection with an award; penalties","url":"\/65.2-312\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-312","metadata":{"court_decisions":""}},{"id":376592,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-313","catch_line":"Method of determining employer's offset in event of recovery under \u00a7 65.2-309 or \u00a7 65.2-310","url":"\/65.2-313\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-313","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Naa Lamiley Williams v. Capital Hospice and Companion .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"0947154","citation":"66 Va. App. 161","date":"2016-03-29","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/3189460\/naa-lamiley-williams-v-capital-hospice-and-companion-property-casualty\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. HUMPHREYS, Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":"Willie Carl Emberton, Sr. v. White Supply & Glass Company","case_number":"2995033","citation":"43 Va. App. 452","date":"2004-07-06","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1063768\/willie-carl-emberton-sr-v-white-supply-glass-company\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. ROSEMARIE ANNUNZIATA, Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"McKnight v. Work Environment Associates & Travelers","case_number":"0482032","citation":"596 S.E.2d 573","date":"2004-06-01","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1063821\/mcknight-v-work-environment-associates-travelers\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 596 S.E.2d 573 (2004) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"Hawkins v. COM.\/SOUTHSIDE VA. TRAINING","case_number":"Record 971154","citation":"497 S.E.2d 839","date":"1998-02-27","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059941\/hawkins-v-comsouthside-va-training\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 497 S.E.2d 839 (1998) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":"James A. Robinson v. Trego Stone Corp & NiagaraFire","case_number":"0861972","citation":"26 Va. App. 97","date":"1997-11-25","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1067231\/james-a-robinson-v-trego-stone-corp-niagarafire\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. *99 .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":"Morad Eghbal v. Boston Coach Corporation","case_number":"1128964","citation":"23 Va. App. 634","date":"1996-12-17","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1067683\/morad-eghbal-v-boston-coach-corporation\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. WILLIS, Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"}}}}],"previous_section":{"id":376576,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-300","catch_line":"Presumption of acceptance of provisions of title; exemptions; notice and rejection","url":"\/65.2-300\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-300","metadata":false},"next_section":{"id":376577,"structure_id":53546,"section_number":"65.2-301.1","catch_line":"Public safety officers","url":"\/65.2-301.1\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-301.1","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Shannon Conner v. City of Danville","case_number":"1486184","citation":"826 S.E.2d 337","date":"2019-04-23","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4612367\/shannon-conner-v-city-of-danville\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Cary O'Donoghue v. United Continental Holdings, Inc. and .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"1149184","citation":"824 S.E.2d 519","date":"2019-03-26","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4603610\/cary-odonoghue-v-united-continental-holdings-inc-and-united-airlines\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"}}}},"metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Hartman v. Retailers & Manufacturers Distribution Marking .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"Civil Action No. 7:12-cv-00199","citation":"929 F. Supp. 2d 581","date":"2013-03-08","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/8723414\/hartman-v-retailers-manufacturers-distribution-marking-service-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. MEMORANDUM OPINION .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, W.D. Virginia"},"1":{"name":"Butler v. SOUTHERN STATES CO-OP., INC.","case_number":"Record 050022.","citation":"620 S.E.2d 768","date":"2005-11-04","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1058908\/butler-v-southern-states-co-op-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 620 S.E.2d 768 (2005) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"Carr v. City of Norfolk","case_number":"Record No. 1993-91-1","citation":"422 S.E.2d 417","date":"1992-10-20","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1325576\/carr-v-city-of-norfolk\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 422 S.E.2d 417 (1992) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"Shannon Conner v. City of Danville","case_number":"1486184","citation":"826 S.E.2d 337","date":"2019-04-23","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4612367\/shannon-conner-v-city-of-danville\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":"M.G. v. Albemarle County Department of Social Services","case_number":"0230032","citation":"583 S.E.2d 761","date":"2003-07-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1064171\/mg-v-albemarle-county-department-of-social-services\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 583 S.E.2d 761 (2003) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":"Beardsley v. Isom","case_number":"Civ. A. No. 92-1294-A","citation":"828 F. Supp. 397","date":"1993-03-10","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2351987\/beardsley-v-isom\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 828 F.Supp. 397 (1993) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"6":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Cary O'Donoghue v. United Continental Holdings, Inc. and .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"1149184","citation":"824 S.E.2d 519","date":"2019-03-26","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4603610\/cary-odonoghue-v-united-continental-holdings-inc-and-united-airlines\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"COA<\/abbr>"},"7":{"name":"Hott v. VDO Yazaki Corp.","case_number":"Civil A. 94-00064-H","citation":"922 F. Supp. 1114","date":"1996-04-02","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1592683\/hott-v-vdo-yazaki-corp\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 922 F.Supp. 1114 (1996) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, W.D. Virginia"},"8":{"name":"Beardsley v. Isom","case_number":"Civ. A. No. 92-1294-A","citation":"828 F. Supp. 384","date":"1993-03-10","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/8719518\/beardsley-v-isom\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. MEMORANDUM OPINION .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"}}},"official_url":"https:\/\/law.lis.virginia.gov\/vacode\/65.2-301\/","history_text":"

This law was first created in 1982. The record of its establishment is cataloged in chapter 303 of that year\u2019s edition of \u201cActs of Assembly,\u201d the annual state publication listing all changes made to the Code of Virginia in that year. Unfortunately, the 1982 \u201cActs\u201d aren\u2019t available online. It has been modified 4 times. Those modifications are cataloged by \u201cThe Acts of Assembly,\u201d a state publication, by year and chapter. Those modifications that can be read on the General Assembly\u2019s website will be linked accordingly. Those modifications are as follows: in 1986, chapter 395; in 1988, chapter 635; in 1991, chapter 355; in 1992, chapter 469.<\/p>","references":false,"refers_to":[{"id":351136,"section_number":"18.2-61","catch_line":"Rape","order_by":null,"url":"\/18.2-61\/"},{"id":351146,"section_number":"18.2-67.1","catch_line":"Forcible sodomy","order_by":null,"url":"\/18.2-67.1\/"},{"id":351150,"section_number":"18.2-67.3","catch_line":"Aggravated sexual battery; penalty","order_by":null,"url":"\/18.2-67.3\/"},{"id":351151,"section_number":"18.2-67.4","catch_line":"Sexual battery","order_by":null,"url":"\/18.2-67.4\/"}],"permalink":{"id":1503293,"object_type":"law","relational_id":376579,"identifier":"65.2-301","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-301","url":"\/65.2-301\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1},"url":"\/65.2-301\/","token":"65.2\/3\/65.2-301","dublin_core":{"Title":"Victims of sexual assault","Type":"Text","Format":"text\/html","Identifier":"\u00a7 65.2-301","Relation":"Code of Virginia"},"html":"\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

A.<\/span> Any employee who, in the course of employment, is sexually assaulted, as defined in §§ 18.2-61<\/a>, 18.2-67.1<\/a>, 18.2-67.3<\/a>, or § 18.2-67.4<\/a>, and promptly reports the assault<\/span> to the appropriate law<\/span>-enforcement authority, where the nature of such employment substantially increases the risk of such assault<\/span>, upon a proper showing of damages<\/span> compensable under this title, shall be deemed to have suffered an injury<\/span> arising out of the employment and shall have a valid claim for workers’ compensation benefits. <\/i><\/a><\/p><\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

B.<\/span> Notwithstanding the provisions of this title, an employee who is sexually assaulted and can identify the attacker may elect to pursue an action-at-law<\/span> against the attacker, even if the attacker is the assaulted employee’s employer<\/span> or co-employee, for full damages<\/span> resulting from such assault<\/span> in lieu of pursuing benefits under this title, and upon repayment of any benefits received under this title. <\/i><\/a><\/p><\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

C.<\/span> Nothing in this title shall create a remedy for sexual harassment nor shall this title bar any action at law<\/span>, that might otherwise exist, by an employee who is sexually harassed. <\/i><\/a><\/p><\/section>","plain_text":" CODE OF VIRGINIA\n\nVICTIMS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT (\u00a7 65.2-301)\n\nA. Any employee who, in the course of employment, is sexually assaulted, as\ndefined in §§ 18.2-61, 18.2-67.1, 18.2-67.3, or § 18.2-67.4, and\npromptly reports the assault to the appropriate law-enforcement authority, where\nthe nature of such employment substantially increases the risk of such assault,\nupon a proper showing of damages compensable under this title, shall be deemed\nto have suffered an injury arising out of the employment and shall have a valid\nclaim for workers’ compensation benefits.\n\nB. Notwithstanding the provisions of this title, an employee who is sexually\nassaulted and can identify the attacker may elect to pursue an action-at-law\nagainst the attacker, even if the attacker is the assaulted employee’s\nemployer or co-employee, for full damages resulting from such assault in lieu of\npursuing benefits under this title, and upon repayment of any benefits received\nunder this title.\n\nC. Nothing in this title shall create a remedy for sexual harassment nor shall\nthis title bar any action at law, that might otherwise exist, by an employee who\nis sexually harassed.\n\nHISTORY: 1982, c. 303, \u00a7 65.1-23.1; 1986, c. 395; 1988, c. 635; 1991, c. 355;\n1992, c. 469.","edition":{"id":2,"name":"2026","slug":"2026","date_created":"2026-07-16 18:40:23","date_modified":"2026-08-02 15:14:36","current":1,"order_by":2,"last_import":"2026-08-02 12:37:30"}}