{"formats":[{"name":"JSON","format":"json","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-json\/56-78.json"},{"name":"Plain Text","format":"text","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-text\/56-78.txt"},{"name":"XML","format":"xml","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-xml\/56-78.xml"},{"name":"HTML","format":"html","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-html\/56-78.html"}],"law_id":370731,"edition_id":2,"section_id":370731,"structure_id":52794,"section_number":"56-78","catch_line":"Exclusion from accounts of payments to affiliated companies","history":"1934, p. 744; Michie Code 1942, \u00a7 3774d.","full_text":"In any proceeding, whether upon the Commission&#8217;s own motion or upon complaint, involving the rates or practices of any public service company, the Commission may exclude in whole or in part from the accounts of such public service company any payment or compensation to an affiliated interest for any services rendered or property or service furnished, as above described, under existing contracts or arrangements with such affiliated interest, if it shall appear and be established upon investigation that such payment or compensation or such contract or arrangement is not consistent with the public interest. In such proceeding any payment or compensation may be disapproved or disallowed by the Commission, in whole or in part, unless satisfactory proof is submitted to the Commission of the cost to the affiliated interest rendering the service or furnishing the property or service above described.\n\n","order_by":null,"text":{"0":{"id":1383139,"text":"In any proceeding, whether upon the Commission&#8217;s own motion or upon complaint, involving the rates or practices of any public service company, the Commission may exclude in whole or in part from the accounts of such public service company any payment or compensation to an affiliated interest for any services rendered or property or service furnished, as above described, under existing contracts or arrangements with such affiliated interest, if it shall appear and be established upon investigation that such payment or compensation or such contract or arrangement is not consistent with the public interest. In such proceeding any payment or compensation may be disapproved or disallowed by the Commission, in whole or in part, unless satisfactory proof is submitted to the Commission of the cost to the affiliated interest rendering the service or furnishing the property or service above described.","type":"section","prefixes":[""],"prefix":"","entire_prefix":"","prefix_anchor":"","level":1}},"ancestry":[{"id":52794,"edition_id":2,"name":"Regulation of Relations With Affiliated Interests","identifier":"4","label":"chapter","depth":2,"order_by":5,"parent_id":52702,"metadata":{"child_laws":12,"child_structures":0},"date_created":"2026-08-02 03:05:42","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:35:36","permalink":{"id":1478099,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":52794,"identifier":"4","token":"56\/4","url":"\/56\/4\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}},{"id":52702,"edition_id":2,"name":"Public Service Companies","identifier":"56","label":"title","depth":1,"order_by":121,"parent_id":null,"metadata":{"child_laws":710,"child_structures":93},"date_created":"2026-08-02 03:03:25","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:35:34","permalink":{"id":1475475,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":52702,"identifier":"56","token":"56","url":"\/56\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}}],"structure_contents":[{"id":370729,"structure_id":52794,"section_number":"56-76","catch_line":"Definitions","url":"\/56-76\/","token":"56\/4\/56-76","metadata":false},{"id":370730,"structure_id":52794,"section_number":"56-77","catch_line":"Certain contracts must be approved by the Commission","url":"\/56-77\/","token":"56\/4\/56-77","metadata":false},{"id":370731,"structure_id":52794,"section_number":"56-78","catch_line":"Exclusion from accounts of payments to affiliated companies","url":"\/56-78\/","token":"56\/4\/56-78","metadata":false},{"id":370732,"structure_id":52794,"section_number":"56-79","catch_line":"Proof of costs in cases of payment to affiliated companies","url":"\/56-79\/","token":"56\/4\/56-79","metadata":false},{"id":370736,"structure_id":52794,"section_number":"56-80","catch_line":"Continuing supervisory control over terms and conditions of contracts","url":"\/56-80\/","token":"56\/4\/56-80","metadata":false},{"id":370737,"structure_id":52794,"section_number":"56-81","catch_line":"Summary order prohibiting treatment of payments as operating expenses, etc","url":"\/56-81\/","token":"56\/4\/56-81","metadata":false},{"id":370738,"structure_id":52794,"section_number":"56-82","catch_line":"Approval of loans to affiliates, etc","url":"\/56-82\/","token":"56\/4\/56-82","metadata":false},{"id":370739,"structure_id":52794,"section_number":"56-83","catch_line":"Summary order prohibiting payment of dividends to affiliates","url":"\/56-83\/","token":"56\/4\/56-83","metadata":false},{"id":370740,"structure_id":52794,"section_number":"56-84","catch_line":"Application or petition by public service company and affiliates; hearing; action of Commission; conditions imposed on foreign corporations","url":"\/56-84\/","token":"56\/4\/56-84","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Carl R. Stillman v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company, a .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"86-1105","citation":"811 F.2d 834","date":"1987-02-17","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/483263\/carl-r-stillman-v-norfolk-western-railway-company-a-corporation\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. ERVIN, Circuit Judge: .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"1":{"name":"Metzger v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service","case_number":"93-2112","citation":"38 F.3d 118","date":"1994-10-18","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/680717\/metzger-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-service\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 38 F.3d 118 .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"2":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. John Matala v. Consolidation Coal Company, and Ray Marshall, .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"80-1287","citation":"647 F.2d 427","date":"1981-07-21","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/389958\/john-matala-v-consolidation-coal-company-and-ray-marshall-secretary-of\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 647 F.2d 427 .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"3":{"name":"Scoric v. United States","case_number":"No. 1256","citation":"217 F. 871","date":"1914-09-08","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/8809243\/scoric-v-united-states\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. WOODS, Circuit Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"4":{"name":"Roberts v. CSX Transp., Inc.","case_number":"090194","citation":"688 S.E.2d 178","date":"2010-01-15","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1058248\/roberts-v-csx-transp-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 688 S.E.2d 178 (2010) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":"Sloas v. CSX Transportation, Inc.","case_number":"09-1249, 09-1288","citation":"616 F.3d 380","date":"2010-07-26","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/151543\/sloas-v-csx-transportation-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 616 F.3d 380 (2010) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"6":{"name":"Metzger v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service","case_number":"No. 93-2112","citation":"38 F.3d 118","date":"1994-09-01","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/7030491\/metzger-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-service\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILLIAMS wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge PAYNE .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"7":{"name":"Matala v. Consolidation Coal Co.","case_number":"Nos. 80-1287, 80-1288","citation":"647 F.2d 427","date":"1981-04-24","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/8923951\/matala-v-consolidation-coal-co\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. ERVIN, Circuit Judge: .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"8":{"name":"Conner v. Hendrix","case_number":"Record 3907","citation":"194 Va. 17","date":"1952-09-10","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1365093\/conner-v-hendrix\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Spratley, J., .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"9":{"name":"Fisher v. United States","case_number":"2261","citation":"2 F.2d 843","date":"1924-10-29","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1487095\/fisher-v-united-states\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. WOODS, Circuit Judge. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"}}}},{"id":370741,"structure_id":52794,"section_number":"56-85","catch_line":"Offenses","url":"\/56-85\/","token":"56\/4\/56-85","metadata":false},{"id":370742,"structure_id":52794,"section_number":"56-86","catch_line":"Appeal from decisions of Commission under chapter","url":"\/56-86\/","token":"56\/4\/56-86","metadata":false},{"id":370743,"structure_id":52794,"section_number":"56-87","catch_line":"Rules of Commission to carry out chapter","url":"\/56-87\/","token":"56\/4\/56-87","metadata":false}],"previous_section":{"id":370730,"structure_id":52794,"section_number":"56-77","catch_line":"Certain contracts must be approved by the Commission","url":"\/56-77\/","token":"56\/4\/56-77","metadata":false},"next_section":{"id":370732,"structure_id":52794,"section_number":"56-79","catch_line":"Proof of costs in cases of payment to affiliated companies","url":"\/56-79\/","token":"56\/4\/56-79","metadata":false},"metadata":false,"official_url":"https:\/\/law.lis.virginia.gov\/vacode\/56-78\/","history_text":false,"references":false,"refers_to":false,"permalink":{"id":1478109,"object_type":"law","relational_id":370731,"identifier":"56-78","token":"56\/4\/56-78","url":"\/56-78\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1},"url":"\/56-78\/","token":"56\/4\/56-78","dublin_core":{"Title":"Exclusion from accounts of payments to affiliated companies","Type":"Text","Format":"text\/html","Identifier":"\u00a7 56-78","Relation":"Code of Virginia"},"html":"\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section><p>In any proceeding, whether upon the <span class=\"dictionary\">Commission<\/span>&#8217;s own <span class=\"dictionary\">motion<\/span> or upon complaint, involving the <span class=\"dictionary\">rates<\/span> or practices of any <span class=\"dictionary\">public service company<\/span>, the <span class=\"dictionary\">Commission<\/span> may exclude in whole or in part from the accounts of such <span class=\"dictionary\">public service company<\/span> any payment or compensation to an <span class=\"dictionary\">affiliated interest<\/span> for any services rendered or property or service furnished, as above described, under existing <span class=\"dictionary\">contracts<\/span> or arrangements with such <span class=\"dictionary\">affiliated interest<\/span>, if it shall appear and be established upon investigation that such payment or compensation or such <span class=\"dictionary\">contract<\/span> or arrangement is not consistent with the public interest. In such proceeding any payment or compensation may be disapproved or disallowed by the <span class=\"dictionary\">Commission<\/span>, in whole or in part, unless satisfactory proof is submitted to the <span class=\"dictionary\">Commission<\/span> of the cost to the <span class=\"dictionary\">affiliated interest<\/span> rendering the service or furnishing the property or service above described.<\/p><\/section>","plain_text":"                                 CODE OF VIRGINIA\n\nEXCLUSION FROM ACCOUNTS OF PAYMENTS TO AFFILIATED COMPANIES (\u00a7 56-78)\n\nIn any proceeding, whether upon the Commission&#8217;s own motion or upon\ncomplaint, involving the rates or practices of any public service company, the\nCommission may exclude in whole or in part from the accounts of such public\nservice company any payment or compensation to an affiliated interest for any\nservices rendered or property or service furnished, as above described, under\nexisting contracts or arrangements with such affiliated interest, if it shall\nappear and be established upon investigation that such payment or compensation\nor such contract or arrangement is not consistent with the public interest. In\nsuch proceeding any payment or compensation may be disapproved or disallowed by\nthe Commission, in whole or in part, unless satisfactory proof is submitted to\nthe Commission of the cost to the affiliated interest rendering the service or\nfurnishing the property or service above described.\n\nHISTORY: 1934, p. 744; Michie Code 1942, \u00a7 3774d.","edition":{"id":2,"name":"2026","slug":"2026","date_created":"2026-07-16 18:40:23","date_modified":"2026-08-02 15:14:36","current":1,"order_by":2,"last_import":"2026-08-02 12:37:30"}}