{"formats":[{"name":"JSON","format":"json","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-json\/56-464.json"},{"name":"Plain Text","format":"text","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-text\/56-464.txt"},{"name":"XML","format":"xml","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-xml\/56-464.xml"},{"name":"HTML","format":"html","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-html\/56-464.html"}],"law_id":370432,"edition_id":2,"section_id":370432,"structure_id":52760,"section_number":"56-464","catch_line":"Right of eminent domain","history":"Code 1919, \u00a7 4040.","full_text":"If the company and such owner cannot agree on the terms of such contract, the company may acquire such right-of-way in the manner provided by the laws of this Commonwealth for the exercise of the right of eminent domain. The title which may be acquired by a telegraph or telephone company under this section shall be only to a right-of-way for the purpose stated in \u00a7 56-463; and no right-of-way acquired by any such company under this or the preceding sections of this chapter shall be to the exclusion of other like companies from having or acquiring a like right-of-way over the same lands.\n\n","order_by":null,"text":{"0":{"id":1381668,"text":"If the company and such owner cannot agree on the terms of such contract, the company may acquire such right-of-way in the manner provided by the laws of this Commonwealth for the exercise of the right of eminent domain. The title which may be acquired by a telegraph or telephone company under this section shall be only to a right-of-way for the purpose stated in \u00a7 56-463; and no right-of-way acquired by any such company under this or the preceding sections of this chapter shall be to the exclusion of other like companies from having or acquiring a like right-of-way over the same lands.","type":"section","prefixes":[""],"prefix":"","entire_prefix":"","prefix_anchor":"","level":1}},"ancestry":[{"id":52760,"edition_id":2,"name":"Erection of Lines; Rights-Of-Way; Eminent Domain, Etc","identifier":"1","label":"article","depth":3,"order_by":1,"parent_id":52759,"metadata":{"child_laws":16,"child_structures":0},"date_created":"2026-08-02 03:04:11","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:35:43","permalink":{"id":1476831,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":52760,"identifier":"1","token":"56\/15\/1","url":"\/56\/15\/1\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}},{"id":52759,"edition_id":2,"name":"Telegraph and Telephone Companies","identifier":"15","label":"chapter","depth":2,"order_by":30,"parent_id":52702,"metadata":{"child_laws":62,"child_structures":9},"date_created":"2026-08-02 03:04:11","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:35:43","permalink":{"id":1476829,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":52759,"identifier":"15","token":"56\/15","url":"\/56\/15\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}},{"id":52702,"edition_id":2,"name":"Public Service Companies","identifier":"56","label":"title","depth":1,"order_by":121,"parent_id":null,"metadata":{"child_laws":710,"child_structures":93},"date_created":"2026-08-02 03:03:25","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:35:34","permalink":{"id":1475475,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":52702,"identifier":"56","token":"56","url":"\/56\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}}],"structure_contents":[{"id":370423,"structure_id":52760,"section_number":"56-458","catch_line":"Right to erect lines parallel to railroads; occupation of roads, streets, etc.; location of same","url":"\/56-458\/","token":"56\/15\/1\/56-458","metadata":false},{"id":370422,"structure_id":52760,"section_number":"56-458.1","catch_line":"Relocation of lines or works of certain public utilities acquired by Commonwealth Transportation Board","url":"\/56-458.1\/","token":"56\/15\/1\/56-458.1","metadata":false},{"id":370424,"structure_id":52760,"section_number":"56-459","catch_line":"Removal of old line not required by this chapter","url":"\/56-459\/","token":"56\/15\/1\/56-459","metadata":false},{"id":370428,"structure_id":52760,"section_number":"56-460","catch_line":"How consent of appropriate authorities obtained; terms of use","url":"\/56-460\/","token":"56\/15\/1\/56-460","metadata":false},{"id":370429,"structure_id":52760,"section_number":"56-461","catch_line":"Cost to Commonwealth in connection with construction of line to be paid by company","url":"\/56-461\/","token":"56\/15\/1\/56-461","metadata":false},{"id":370430,"structure_id":52760,"section_number":"56-462","catch_line":"Franchise to occupy parks, streets, etc.; imposition of terms, conditions, etc., as to use of streets, etc., and construction thereon","url":"\/56-462\/","token":"56\/15\/1\/56-462","metadata":false},{"id":370431,"structure_id":52760,"section_number":"56-463","catch_line":"Company may contract for right-of-way, etc","url":"\/56-463\/","token":"56\/15\/1\/56-463","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Kricorian v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.","case_number":"Record 751119","citation":"217 Va. 284","date":"1976-09-02","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1296180\/kricorian-v-chesapeake-potomac-telephone-co\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 217 Va. 284 (1976) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":370432,"structure_id":52760,"section_number":"56-464","catch_line":"Right of eminent domain","url":"\/56-464\/","token":"56\/15\/1\/56-464","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Chaffinch v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia, .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"Record 811630","citation":"313 S.E.2d 376","date":"1984-03-09","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1337336\/chaffinch-v-chesapeake-potomac-telephone-co-of-virginia-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 313 S.E.2d 376 (1984) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":"Kricorian v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.","case_number":"Record 751119","citation":"217 Va. 284","date":"1976-09-02","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1296180\/kricorian-v-chesapeake-potomac-telephone-co\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 217 Va. 284 (1976) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"AGCS Marine Ins. Co. v. Arlington Cnty.","case_number":"Record 160221","citation":"800 S.E.2d 159","date":"2017-06-15","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4400402\/agcs-marine-ins-co-v-arlington-cnty\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. OPINION BY JUSTICE D. ARTHUR KELSEY .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"AGCS Marine Ins. v. Arlington County","case_number":"160221","citation":null,"date":"2017-06-15","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4400618\/agcs-marine-ins-v-arlington-county\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PRESENT: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Clifton Forge-Waynesboro .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"Record 750812","citation":"224 S.E.2d 317","date":"1976-04-23","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1292687\/chesapeake-ohio-railway-co-v-clifton-forge-waynesboro-telephone-co\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 224 S.E.2d 317 (1976) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":"Cosner v. Dalton","case_number":"Civ. A. 81-0492-R, 81-0516-R, 81-0530-R, 81-0552-R, 81-591-A, 81-0636-A and 81-0145-Roanoke","citation":"522 F. Supp. 350","date":"1981-08-25","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1519239\/cosner-v-dalton\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 522 F.Supp. 350 (1981) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"}}}},{"id":370433,"structure_id":52760,"section_number":"56-465","catch_line":"Preceding sections subject to repeal or change at pleasure","url":"\/56-465\/","token":"56\/15\/1\/56-465","metadata":false},{"id":370436,"structure_id":52760,"section_number":"56-466","catch_line":"Location of posts, poles, cables and conduits; height of wires, etc","url":"\/56-466\/","token":"56\/15\/1\/56-466","metadata":false},{"id":370434,"structure_id":52760,"section_number":"56-466.1","catch_line":"Pole attachments; cable television systems and telecommunications service providers","url":"\/56-466.1\/","token":"56\/15\/1\/56-466.1","metadata":false},{"id":370435,"structure_id":52760,"section_number":"56-466.2","catch_line":"Undergrounding existing overhead distribution lines; relocation of facilities of cable operator","url":"\/56-466.2\/","token":"56\/15\/1\/56-466.2","metadata":false},{"id":370437,"structure_id":52760,"section_number":"56-467","catch_line":"Restoring condition of ground","url":"\/56-467\/","token":"56\/15\/1\/56-467","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Currie v. Commonwealth","case_number":"0477984","citation":"515 S.E.2d 335","date":"1999-06-15","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1066296\/currie-v-commonwealth\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 515 S.E.2d 335 (1999) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Court of Appeals\">COA<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":"Palmer v. Charles E. Frosst & Co.","case_number":"","citation":"139 Va. 239","date":"1924-06-12","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/6919863\/palmer-v-charles-e-frosst-co\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Campbell, J., .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":370440,"structure_id":52760,"section_number":"56-468","catch_line":"Endangering life or limb by stringing wires across other works","url":"\/56-468\/","token":"56\/15\/1\/56-468","metadata":false},{"id":370438,"structure_id":52760,"section_number":"56-468.1","catch_line":"(Contingent expiration -- see Editor's note) Public Rights-of-Way Use Fee","url":"\/56-468.1\/","token":"56\/15\/1\/56-468.1","metadata":false},{"id":370439,"structure_id":52760,"section_number":"56-468.2","catch_line":"Reimbursement for relocation costs","url":"\/56-468.2\/","token":"56\/15\/1\/56-468.2","metadata":false}],"previous_section":{"id":370431,"structure_id":52760,"section_number":"56-463","catch_line":"Company may contract for right-of-way, etc","url":"\/56-463\/","token":"56\/15\/1\/56-463","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Kricorian v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.","case_number":"Record 751119","citation":"217 Va. 284","date":"1976-09-02","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1296180\/kricorian-v-chesapeake-potomac-telephone-co\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 217 Va. 284 (1976) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"}}}},"next_section":{"id":370433,"structure_id":52760,"section_number":"56-465","catch_line":"Preceding sections subject to repeal or change at pleasure","url":"\/56-465\/","token":"56\/15\/1\/56-465","metadata":false},"metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Chaffinch v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia, .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"Record 811630","citation":"313 S.E.2d 376","date":"1984-03-09","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1337336\/chaffinch-v-chesapeake-potomac-telephone-co-of-virginia-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 313 S.E.2d 376 (1984) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":"Kricorian v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.","case_number":"Record 751119","citation":"217 Va. 284","date":"1976-09-02","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1296180\/kricorian-v-chesapeake-potomac-telephone-co\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 217 Va. 284 (1976) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"AGCS Marine Ins. Co. v. Arlington Cnty.","case_number":"Record 160221","citation":"800 S.E.2d 159","date":"2017-06-15","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4400402\/agcs-marine-ins-co-v-arlington-cnty\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. OPINION BY JUSTICE D. ARTHUR KELSEY .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"AGCS Marine Ins. v. Arlington County","case_number":"160221","citation":null,"date":"2017-06-15","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/4400618\/agcs-marine-ins-v-arlington-county\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. PRESENT: All the Justices .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Clifton Forge-Waynesboro .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"Record 750812","citation":"224 S.E.2d 317","date":"1976-04-23","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1292687\/chesapeake-ohio-railway-co-v-clifton-forge-waynesboro-telephone-co\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 224 S.E.2d 317 (1976) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"5":{"name":"Cosner v. Dalton","case_number":"Civ. A. 81-0492-R, 81-0516-R, 81-0530-R, 81-0552-R, 81-591-A, 81-0636-A and 81-0145-Roanoke","citation":"522 F. Supp. 350","date":"1981-08-25","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1519239\/cosner-v-dalton\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 522 F.Supp. 350 (1981) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"}}},"official_url":"https:\/\/law.lis.virginia.gov\/vacode\/56-464\/","history_text":false,"references":false,"refers_to":[{"id":370431,"section_number":"56-463","catch_line":"Company may contract for right-of-way, etc","order_by":null,"url":"\/56-463\/"}],"permalink":{"id":1476861,"object_type":"law","relational_id":370432,"identifier":"56-464","token":"56\/15\/1\/56-464","url":"\/56-464\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1},"url":"\/56-464\/","token":"56\/15\/1\/56-464","dublin_core":{"Title":"Right of eminent domain","Type":"Text","Format":"text\/html","Identifier":"\u00a7 56-464","Relation":"Code of Virginia"},"html":"\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section><p>If the <span class=\"dictionary\">company<\/span> and such owner cannot agree on the terms of such <span class=\"dictionary\">contract<\/span>, the <span class=\"dictionary\">company<\/span> may acquire such right-of-way in the manner provided by the <span class=\"dictionary\">laws<\/span> of this Commonwealth for the exercise of the right of eminent domain. The title which may be acquired by a telegraph or telephone <span class=\"dictionary\">company<\/span> under this section shall be only to a right-of-way for the purpose stated in \u00a7&nbsp;<a class=\"law\" title=\"Company may contract for right-of-way, etc\" href=\"\/56-463\/\">56-463<\/a>; and no right-of-way acquired by any such <span class=\"dictionary\">company<\/span> under this or the preceding sections of this chapter shall be to the exclusion of other like companies from having or acquiring a like right-of-way over the same lands.<\/p><\/section>","plain_text":"                                 CODE OF VIRGINIA\n\nRIGHT OF EMINENT DOMAIN (\u00a7 56-464)\n\nIf the company and such owner cannot agree on the terms of such contract, the\ncompany may acquire such right-of-way in the manner provided by the laws of this\nCommonwealth for the exercise of the right of eminent domain. The title which\nmay be acquired by a telegraph or telephone company under this section shall be\nonly to a right-of-way for the purpose stated in \u00a7 56-463; and no right-of-way\nacquired by any such company under this or the preceding sections of this\nchapter shall be to the exclusion of other like companies from having or\nacquiring a like right-of-way over the same lands.\n\nHISTORY: Code 1919, \u00a7 4040.","edition":{"id":2,"name":"2026","slug":"2026","date_created":"2026-07-16 18:40:23","date_modified":"2026-08-02 15:14:36","current":1,"order_by":2,"last_import":"2026-08-02 12:37:30"}}