{"formats":[{"name":"JSON","format":"json","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-json\/13.1-746.3.json"},{"name":"Plain Text","format":"text","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-text\/13.1-746.3.txt"},{"name":"XML","format":"xml","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-xml\/13.1-746.3.xml"},{"name":"HTML","format":"html","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-html\/13.1-746.3.html"}],"law_id":346925,"edition_id":2,"section_id":346925,"structure_id":49801,"section_number":"13.1-746.3","catch_line":"Director duties","history":"2005, c. 765; 2019, c. 734.","full_text":"A\n\nDirectors shall cause the dissolved corporation to apply its remaining assets to discharge or make reasonable provision for the payment of claims and make distributions in liquidation of assets to shareholders after payment or provision for claims.\n\nB\n\nDirectors of a dissolved corporation that has disposed of claims under &#xA7; 13.1-746, 13.1-746.1 or 13.1-746.2 shall not be liable for breach of subsection A with respect to claims against the dissolved corporation that are barred or satisfied under &#xA7; 13.1-746, 13.1-746.1 or 13.1-746.2.\n\n","order_by":null,"text":{"0":{"id":1294277,"text":"Directors shall cause the dissolved corporation to apply its remaining assets to discharge or make reasonable provision for the payment of claims and make distributions in liquidation of assets to shareholders after payment or provision for claims.","type":"section","prefixes":["A"],"prefix":"A","entire_prefix":"A","prefix_anchor":"A","level":1,"next_prefix":"B"},"1":{"id":1294278,"text":"Directors of a dissolved corporation that has disposed of claims under &#xA7; 13.1-746, 13.1-746.1 or 13.1-746.2 shall not be liable for breach of subsection A with respect to claims against the dissolved corporation that are barred or satisfied under &#xA7; 13.1-746, 13.1-746.1 or 13.1-746.2.","type":"section","prefixes":["B"],"prefix":"B","entire_prefix":"B","prefix_anchor":"B","level":1,"prior_prefix":"A"}},"ancestry":[{"id":49801,"edition_id":2,"name":"Dissolution","identifier":"16","label":"article","depth":3,"order_by":21,"parent_id":49780,"metadata":{"child_laws":19,"child_structures":0},"date_created":"2026-08-02 02:15:41","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:29:13","permalink":{"id":1377609,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":49801,"identifier":"16","token":"13.1\/9\/16","url":"\/13.1\/9\/16\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}},{"id":49780,"edition_id":2,"name":"Virginia Stock Corporation Act","identifier":"9","label":"chapter","depth":2,"order_by":12,"parent_id":49726,"metadata":{"child_laws":265,"child_structures":27},"date_created":"2026-08-02 02:14:54","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:29:09","permalink":{"id":1377165,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":49780,"identifier":"9","token":"13.1\/9","url":"\/13.1\/9\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}},{"id":49726,"edition_id":2,"name":"Corporations","identifier":"13.1","label":"title","depth":1,"order_by":44,"parent_id":null,"metadata":{"child_laws":894,"child_structures":104},"date_created":"2026-08-02 02:14:01","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:29:04","permalink":{"id":1374495,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":49726,"identifier":"13.1","token":"13.1","url":"\/13.1\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}}],"structure_contents":[{"id":346919,"structure_id":49801,"section_number":"13.1-742","catch_line":"Dissolution by directors and shareholders","url":"\/13.1-742\/","token":"13.1\/9\/16\/13.1-742","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Maurag, Inc. v. Bertuglia","case_number":"Civil Action 4:06cv73","citation":"494 F. Supp. 2d 395","date":"2007-07-16","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2150367\/maurag-inc-v-bertuglia\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 494 F.Supp.2d 395 (2007) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"}}}},{"id":346920,"structure_id":49801,"section_number":"13.1-743","catch_line":"Articles of dissolution","url":"\/13.1-743\/","token":"13.1\/9\/16\/13.1-743","metadata":false},{"id":346921,"structure_id":49801,"section_number":"13.1-744","catch_line":"Revocation of dissolution","url":"\/13.1-744\/","token":"13.1\/9\/16\/13.1-744","metadata":{"court_decisions":""}},{"id":346922,"structure_id":49801,"section_number":"13.1-745","catch_line":"Effect of dissolution","url":"\/13.1-745\/","token":"13.1\/9\/16\/13.1-745","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Commonwealth Transp. v. Windsor Industries","case_number":"Record 051335.","citation":"630 S.E.2d 514","date":"2006-06-08","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1058810\/commonwealth-transp-v-windsor-industries\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 630 S.E.2d 514 (2006) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":"In Re Lane","case_number":"19-70349","citation":"215 B.R. 810","date":"1997-12-04","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1911335\/in-re-lane\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 215 B.R. 810 (1997) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia"},"2":{"name":"City of Virginia Beach v. Bell","case_number":"Record 971117","citation":"498 S.E.2d 414","date":"1998-02-27","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059943\/city-of-virginia-beach-v-bell\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 498 S.E.2d 414 (1998) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":346926,"structure_id":49801,"section_number":"13.1-746","catch_line":"Known claims against dissolved corporation","url":"\/13.1-746\/","token":"13.1\/9\/16\/13.1-746","metadata":{"court_decisions":""}},{"id":346923,"structure_id":49801,"section_number":"13.1-746.1","catch_line":"Other claims against dissolved corporation","url":"\/13.1-746.1\/","token":"13.1\/9\/16\/13.1-746.1","metadata":{"court_decisions":""}},{"id":346924,"structure_id":49801,"section_number":"13.1-746.2","catch_line":"Court proceedings","url":"\/13.1-746.2\/","token":"13.1\/9\/16\/13.1-746.2","metadata":{"court_decisions":""}},{"id":346925,"structure_id":49801,"section_number":"13.1-746.3","catch_line":"Director duties","url":"\/13.1-746.3\/","token":"13.1\/9\/16\/13.1-746.3","metadata":false},{"id":346927,"structure_id":49801,"section_number":"13.1-747","catch_line":"Grounds for judicial dissolution","url":"\/13.1-747\/","token":"13.1\/9\/16\/13.1-747","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Schultz v. Schultz","case_number":"Record 941129","citation":"458 S.E.2d 458","date":"1995-06-09","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1060277\/schultz-v-schultz\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 458 S.E.2d 458 (1995) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":"Jordon v. Bowman Apple Products Co., Inc.","case_number":"Civ. A. 89-0021-C","citation":"728 F. Supp. 409","date":"1990-01-10","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2596712\/jordon-v-bowman-apple-products-co-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 728 F.Supp. 409 (1990) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, W.D. Virginia"},"2":{"name":"In re McCurnin","case_number":"Case No. 16-30093-KLP; Case No. 15-36551-KLP; Adv. Pro. No. 17-04553-KLP","citation":"590 B.R. 729","date":"2018-09-24","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/8529140\/in-re-mccurnin\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Keith L. Phillips, United States Bankruptcy Judge .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia"},"3":{"name":"Willard v. Moneta Building Supply, Inc.","case_number":"Record 981836","citation":"515 S.E.2d 277","date":"1999-06-11","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059739\/willard-v-moneta-building-supply-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. JUSTICE KINSER .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":"In re Cole","case_number":"Case No. 15-30979-KLP","citation":"548 B.R. 132","date":"2016-03-24","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/8526836\/in-re-cole\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. MEMORANDUM OPINION .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia"},"5":{"name":"Owens v. Owens","case_number":"3140023","citation":"589 S.E.2d 488","date":"2003-12-16","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1064049\/owens-v-owens\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 589 S.E.2d 488 (2003) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Court of Appeals\">COA<\/abbr>"},"6":{"name":"CATTANO v. Bragg","case_number":"110692","citation":"727 S.E.2d 625","date":"2012-04-20","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1057899\/cattano-v-bragg\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 727 S.E.2d 625 (2012) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"7":{"name":"Giannotti v. Hamway","case_number":"Record 880555","citation":"387 S.E.2d 725","date":"1990-01-12","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1261157\/giannotti-v-hamway\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 387 S.E.2d 725 (1990) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":346928,"structure_id":49801,"section_number":"13.1-748","catch_line":"Receivership or custodianship","url":"\/13.1-748\/","token":"13.1\/9\/16\/13.1-748","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"CATTANO v. Bragg","case_number":"110692","citation":"727 S.E.2d 625","date":"2012-04-20","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1057899\/cattano-v-bragg\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 727 S.E.2d 625 (2012) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":"Commonwealth Ex Rel. Beales v. Joco Foundation","case_number":"Record 011794","citation":"558 S.E.2d 280","date":"2002-01-11","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059393\/commonwealth-ex-rel-beales-v-joco-foundation\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. SENIOR JUSTICE COMPTON .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"2":{"name":"Giannotti v. Hamway","case_number":"Record 880555","citation":"387 S.E.2d 725","date":"1990-01-12","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1261157\/giannotti-v-hamway\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 387 S.E.2d 725 (1990) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":346930,"structure_id":49801,"section_number":"13.1-749","catch_line":"Decree of dissolution","url":"\/13.1-749\/","token":"13.1\/9\/16\/13.1-749","metadata":false},{"id":346929,"structure_id":49801,"section_number":"13.1-749.1","catch_line":"Election to purchase in lieu of dissolution","url":"\/13.1-749.1\/","token":"13.1\/9\/16\/13.1-749.1","metadata":{"court_decisions":""}},{"id":346931,"structure_id":49801,"section_number":"13.1-750","catch_line":"Articles of termination of corporate existence","url":"\/13.1-750\/","token":"13.1\/9\/16\/13.1-750","metadata":{"court_decisions":""}},{"id":346932,"structure_id":49801,"section_number":"13.1-751","catch_line":"Termination of corporate existence by incorporators or initial directors","url":"\/13.1-751\/","token":"13.1\/9\/16\/13.1-751","metadata":false},{"id":346933,"structure_id":49801,"section_number":"13.1-752","catch_line":"Automatic termination of corporate existence","url":"\/13.1-752\/","token":"13.1\/9\/16\/13.1-752","metadata":false},{"id":346934,"structure_id":49801,"section_number":"13.1-753","catch_line":"Involuntary termination of corporate existence","url":"\/13.1-753\/","token":"13.1\/9\/16\/13.1-753","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"In re McCurnin","case_number":"Case No. 16-30093-KLP; Case No. 15-36551-KLP; Adv. Pro. No. 17-04553-KLP","citation":"590 B.R. 729","date":"2018-09-24","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/8529140\/in-re-mccurnin\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Keith L. Phillips, United States Bankruptcy Judge .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia"},"1":{"name":"In Re Lane","case_number":"19-70349","citation":"215 B.R. 810","date":"1997-12-04","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1911335\/in-re-lane\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 215 B.R. 810 (1997) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia"},"2":{"name":"SAFETY CAS. INS. v. CG MITCHELL","case_number":"Record No. 032709.","citation":"601 S.E.2d 633","date":"2004-09-17","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/7472425\/safety-cas-ins-v-cg-mitchell\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. KINSER, Justice. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"Safety Cas. Ins. v. Cg Mitchell","case_number":"032709","citation":"601 S.E.2d 633","date":"2004-09-17","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059052\/safety-cas-ins-v-cg-mitchell\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 601 S.E.2d 633 (2004) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":346935,"structure_id":49801,"section_number":"13.1-754","catch_line":"Reinstatement of a corporation that has ceased to exist","url":"\/13.1-754\/","token":"13.1\/9\/16\/13.1-754","metadata":false},{"id":346936,"structure_id":49801,"section_number":"13.1-755","catch_line":"Survival of remedy after termination of corporate existence","url":"\/13.1-755\/","token":"13.1\/9\/16\/13.1-755","metadata":false},{"id":346937,"structure_id":49801,"section_number":"13.1-756","catch_line":"Repealed","url":"\/13.1-756\/","token":"13.1\/9\/16\/13.1-756","metadata":false}],"previous_section":{"id":346924,"structure_id":49801,"section_number":"13.1-746.2","catch_line":"Court proceedings","url":"\/13.1-746.2\/","token":"13.1\/9\/16\/13.1-746.2","metadata":{"court_decisions":""}},"next_section":{"id":346927,"structure_id":49801,"section_number":"13.1-747","catch_line":"Grounds for judicial dissolution","url":"\/13.1-747\/","token":"13.1\/9\/16\/13.1-747","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Schultz v. Schultz","case_number":"Record 941129","citation":"458 S.E.2d 458","date":"1995-06-09","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1060277\/schultz-v-schultz\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 458 S.E.2d 458 (1995) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"1":{"name":"Jordon v. Bowman Apple Products Co., Inc.","case_number":"Civ. A. 89-0021-C","citation":"728 F. Supp. 409","date":"1990-01-10","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2596712\/jordon-v-bowman-apple-products-co-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 728 F.Supp. 409 (1990) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, W.D. Virginia"},"2":{"name":"In re McCurnin","case_number":"Case No. 16-30093-KLP; Case No. 15-36551-KLP; Adv. Pro. No. 17-04553-KLP","citation":"590 B.R. 729","date":"2018-09-24","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/8529140\/in-re-mccurnin\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Keith L. Phillips, United States Bankruptcy Judge .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia"},"3":{"name":"Willard v. Moneta Building Supply, Inc.","case_number":"Record 981836","citation":"515 S.E.2d 277","date":"1999-06-11","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059739\/willard-v-moneta-building-supply-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. JUSTICE KINSER .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":"In re Cole","case_number":"Case No. 15-30979-KLP","citation":"548 B.R. 132","date":"2016-03-24","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/8526836\/in-re-cole\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. MEMORANDUM OPINION .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia"},"5":{"name":"Owens v. Owens","case_number":"3140023","citation":"589 S.E.2d 488","date":"2003-12-16","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1064049\/owens-v-owens\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 589 S.E.2d 488 (2003) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Court of Appeals\">COA<\/abbr>"},"6":{"name":"CATTANO v. Bragg","case_number":"110692","citation":"727 S.E.2d 625","date":"2012-04-20","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1057899\/cattano-v-bragg\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 727 S.E.2d 625 (2012) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"},"7":{"name":"Giannotti v. Hamway","case_number":"Record 880555","citation":"387 S.E.2d 725","date":"1990-01-12","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1261157\/giannotti-v-hamway\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 387 S.E.2d 725 (1990) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"<abbr title=\"Supreme Court of Virginia\">SCV<\/abbr>"}}}},"metadata":false,"official_url":"https:\/\/law.lis.virginia.gov\/vacode\/13.1-746.3\/","history_text":"<p>This law was first created in 2005. The record of its establishment is cataloged in chapter <a href=\"https:\/\/legacylis.virginia.gov\/cgi-bin\/legp604.exe?051+ful+CHAP0765\">765<\/a> of that year\u2019s edition of \u201cActs of Assembly,\u201d the annual state publication listing all changes made to the Code of Virginia in that year. It has been modified 1 time. Those modifications are cataloged by \u201cThe Acts of Assembly,\u201d a state publication, by year and chapter. Those modifications that can be read on the General Assembly\u2019s website will be linked accordingly. That modification is as follows: in 2019, chapter <a href=\"https:\/\/legacylis.virginia.gov\/cgi-bin\/legp604.exe?191+ful+CHAP0734\">734<\/a>.<\/p>","references":false,"refers_to":[{"id":346926,"section_number":"13.1-746","catch_line":"Known claims against dissolved corporation","order_by":null,"url":"\/13.1-746\/"},{"id":346923,"section_number":"13.1-746.1","catch_line":"Other claims against dissolved corporation","order_by":null,"url":"\/13.1-746.1\/"},{"id":346924,"section_number":"13.1-746.2","catch_line":"Court proceedings","order_by":null,"url":"\/13.1-746.2\/"}],"permalink":{"id":1377639,"object_type":"law","relational_id":346925,"identifier":"13.1-746.3","token":"13.1\/9\/16\/13.1-746.3","url":"\/13.1-746.3\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1},"url":"\/13.1-746.3\/","token":"13.1\/9\/16\/13.1-746.3","dublin_core":{"Title":"Director duties","Type":"Text","Format":"text\/html","Identifier":"\u00a7 13.1-746.3","Relation":"Code of Virginia"},"html":"\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section id=\"A\"><p><span class=\"prefix-number\">A.<\/span> Directors shall cause the dissolved <span class=\"dictionary\">corporation<\/span> to apply its remaining <span class=\"dictionary\">assets<\/span> to discharge or make reasonable provision for the payment of claims and make <span class=\"dictionary\">distributions<\/span> in <span class=\"dictionary\">liquidation<\/span> of <span class=\"dictionary\">assets<\/span> to <span class=\"dictionary\">shareholders<\/span> after payment or provision for claims. <a id=\"paragraph-1294277\" class=\"section-permalink\" href=\"https:\/\/vacode.org\/13.1-746.3\/#A\"><i class=\"fa fa-link\"><\/i><\/a><\/p><\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section id=\"B\"><p><span class=\"prefix-number\">B.<\/span> Directors of a dissolved <span class=\"dictionary\">corporation<\/span> that has disposed of claims under &#xA7; <a class=\"law\" title=\"Known claims against dissolved corporation\" href=\"\/13.1-746\/\">13.1-746<\/a>, <a class=\"law\" title=\"Other claims against dissolved corporation\" href=\"\/13.1-746.1\/\">13.1-746.1<\/a> or <a class=\"law\" title=\"Court proceedings\" href=\"\/13.1-746.2\/\">13.1-746.2<\/a> shall not be liable for breach of subsection A with respect to claims against the dissolved <span class=\"dictionary\">corporation<\/span> that are barred or satisfied under &#xA7; <a class=\"law\" title=\"Known claims against dissolved corporation\" href=\"\/13.1-746\/\">13.1-746<\/a>, <a class=\"law\" title=\"Other claims against dissolved corporation\" href=\"\/13.1-746.1\/\">13.1-746.1<\/a> or <a class=\"law\" title=\"Court proceedings\" href=\"\/13.1-746.2\/\">13.1-746.2<\/a>. <a id=\"paragraph-1294278\" class=\"section-permalink\" href=\"https:\/\/vacode.org\/13.1-746.3\/#B\"><i class=\"fa fa-link\"><\/i><\/a><\/p><\/section>","plain_text":"                                 CODE OF VIRGINIA\n\nDIRECTOR DUTIES (\u00a7 13.1-746.3)\n\nA. Directors shall cause the dissolved corporation to apply its remaining assets\nto discharge or make reasonable provision for the payment of claims and make\ndistributions in liquidation of assets to shareholders after payment or\nprovision for claims.\n\nB. Directors of a dissolved corporation that has disposed of claims under &#xA7;\n13.1-746, 13.1-746.1 or 13.1-746.2 shall not be liable for breach of subsection\nA with respect to claims against the dissolved corporation that are barred or\nsatisfied under &#xA7; 13.1-746, 13.1-746.1 or 13.1-746.2.\n\nHISTORY: 2005, c. 765; 2019, c. 734.","edition":{"id":2,"name":"2026","slug":"2026","date_created":"2026-07-16 18:40:23","date_modified":"2026-08-02 15:14:36","current":1,"order_by":2,"last_import":"2026-08-02 12:37:30"}}