{"formats":[{"name":"JSON","format":"json","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-json\/13.1-691.1.json"},{"name":"Plain Text","format":"text","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-text\/13.1-691.1.txt"},{"name":"XML","format":"xml","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-xml\/13.1-691.1.xml"},{"name":"HTML","format":"html","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-html\/13.1-691.1.html"}],"law_id":346831,"edition_id":2,"section_id":346831,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-691.1","catch_line":"Business opportunities","history":"2005, c. 765.","full_text":"A\n\nA director’s taking advantage, directly or indirectly, of a business opportunity may not be the subject of equitable relief, or give rise to an award of damages or other sanctions against the director, in a proceeding by or in the right of the corporation on the ground that such opportunity should have first been offered to the corporation, if before becoming legally obligated respecting the opportunity the director brings it to the attention of the corporation and:\n\n1\n\nDirectors’ action disclaiming the corporation’s interest in the opportunity is taken in compliance with the procedures set forth in subdivision A 1 of § 13.1-691, as if the decision being made concerned a director’s conflict of interests transaction; or\n\n2\n\nShareholders’ action disclaiming the corporation’s interest in the opportunity is taken in compliance with the procedures set forth in subdivision A 2 of § 13.1-691, as if the decision being made concerned a director’s conflict of interests transaction.\n\nB\n\nIn any proceeding seeking equitable relief or other remedies, based upon an alleged improper taking advantage of a business opportunity by a director, the fact that the director did not employ one of the procedures described in subsection A before taking advantage of the opportunity shall not create an inference that the opportunity should have been first presented to the corporation or alter the burden of proof otherwise applicable to establish that the director breached a duty to the corporation in the circumstances.\n\n","order_by":null,"text":{"0":{"id":1293595,"text":"A director’s taking advantage, directly or indirectly, of a business opportunity may not be the subject of equitable relief, or give rise to an award of damages or other sanctions against the director, in a proceeding by or in the right of the corporation on the ground that such opportunity should have first been offered to the corporation, if before becoming legally obligated respecting the opportunity the director brings it to the attention of the corporation and:","type":"section","prefixes":["A"],"prefix":"A","entire_prefix":"A","prefix_anchor":"A","level":1,"next_prefix":"A1"},"1":{"id":1293596,"text":"Directors’ action disclaiming the corporation’s interest in the opportunity is taken in compliance with the procedures set forth in subdivision A 1 of § 13.1-691, as if the decision being made concerned a director’s conflict of interests transaction; or","type":"section","prefixes":["A","1"],"prefix":"1","entire_prefix":"A1","prefix_anchor":"A1","level":2,"prior_prefix":"A","next_prefix":"A2"},"2":{"id":1293597,"text":"Shareholders’ action disclaiming the corporation’s interest in the opportunity is taken in compliance with the procedures set forth in subdivision A 2 of § 13.1-691, as if the decision being made concerned a director’s conflict of interests transaction.","type":"section","prefixes":["A","2"],"prefix":"2","entire_prefix":"A2","prefix_anchor":"A2","level":2,"prior_prefix":"A1","next_prefix":"B"},"3":{"id":1293598,"text":"In any proceeding seeking equitable relief or other remedies, based upon an alleged improper taking advantage of a business opportunity by a director, the fact that the director did not employ one of the procedures described in subsection A before taking advantage of the opportunity shall not create an inference that the opportunity should have been first presented to the corporation or alter the burden of proof otherwise applicable to establish that the director breached a duty to the corporation in the circumstances.","type":"section","prefixes":["B"],"prefix":"B","entire_prefix":"B","prefix_anchor":"B","level":1,"prior_prefix":"A2"}},"ancestry":[{"id":49791,"edition_id":2,"name":"Directors and Officers","identifier":"9","label":"article","depth":3,"order_by":11,"parent_id":49780,"metadata":{"child_laws":27,"child_structures":0},"date_created":"2026-08-02 02:15:20","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:29:11","permalink":{"id":1378171,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":49791,"identifier":"9","token":"13.1\/9\/9","url":"\/13.1\/9\/9\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}},{"id":49780,"edition_id":2,"name":"Virginia Stock Corporation Act","identifier":"9","label":"chapter","depth":2,"order_by":12,"parent_id":49726,"metadata":{"child_laws":265,"child_structures":27},"date_created":"2026-08-02 02:14:54","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:29:09","permalink":{"id":1377165,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":49780,"identifier":"9","token":"13.1\/9","url":"\/13.1\/9\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}},{"id":49726,"edition_id":2,"name":"Corporations","identifier":"13.1","label":"title","depth":1,"order_by":44,"parent_id":null,"metadata":{"child_laws":894,"child_structures":104},"date_created":"2026-08-02 02:14:01","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:29:04","permalink":{"id":1374495,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":49726,"identifier":"13.1","token":"13.1","url":"\/13.1\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}}],"structure_contents":[{"id":346811,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-673","catch_line":"Requirement for and duties of board of directors","url":"\/13.1-673\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-673","metadata":false},{"id":346812,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-674","catch_line":"Qualifications for directors or for nominees for director","url":"\/13.1-674\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-674","metadata":{"court_decisions":""}},{"id":346813,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-675","catch_line":"Number and election of directors","url":"\/13.1-675\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-675","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"In Re Old Grind Co., Inc.","case_number":"19-70170","citation":"99 B.R. 317","date":"1989-05-25","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2012268\/in-re-old-grind-co-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 99 B.R. 317 (1989) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia"}}}},{"id":346814,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-676","catch_line":"Election of directors by certain classes or series of shares","url":"\/13.1-676\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-676","metadata":{"court_decisions":""}},{"id":346815,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-677","catch_line":"Terms of directors generally","url":"\/13.1-677\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-677","metadata":false},{"id":346816,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-678","catch_line":"Staggered terms for directors","url":"\/13.1-678\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-678","metadata":false},{"id":346817,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-679","catch_line":"Resignation of directors","url":"\/13.1-679\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-679","metadata":false},{"id":346818,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-680","catch_line":"Removal of directors by shareholders","url":"\/13.1-680\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-680","metadata":{"court_decisions":""}},{"id":346820,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-681","catch_line":"Repealed","url":"\/13.1-681\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-681","metadata":false},{"id":346819,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-681.1","catch_line":"Removal of directors by judicial proceeding","url":"\/13.1-681.1\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-681.1","metadata":false},{"id":346821,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-682","catch_line":"Vacancy on board of directors","url":"\/13.1-682\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-682","metadata":false},{"id":346822,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-683","catch_line":"Compensation of directors","url":"\/13.1-683\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-683","metadata":false},{"id":346823,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-684","catch_line":"Meetings of the board of directors","url":"\/13.1-684\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-684","metadata":{"court_decisions":""}},{"id":346824,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-685","catch_line":"Action without meeting of board of directors","url":"\/13.1-685\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-685","metadata":false},{"id":346825,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-686","catch_line":"Notice of board of directors' meetings","url":"\/13.1-686\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-686","metadata":false},{"id":346826,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-687","catch_line":"Waiver of notice by director","url":"\/13.1-687\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-687","metadata":false},{"id":346827,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-688","catch_line":"Quorum and voting by directors","url":"\/13.1-688\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-688","metadata":false},{"id":346828,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-689","catch_line":"Committees","url":"\/13.1-689\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-689","metadata":false},{"id":346830,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-690","catch_line":"General standards of conduct for director","url":"\/13.1-690\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-690","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":" .\u202f.\u202f. Richmond A. Dellastatious, and Frank Romano v. Donald F. .\u202f.\u202f. ","case_number":"00-1577","citation":"242 F.3d 191","date":"2001-02-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/772338\/richmond-a-dellastatious-and-frank-romano-v-donald-f-williams-ray\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 242 F.3d 191 (4th Cir. 2001) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"1":{"name":"Dellastatious v. Williams","case_number":"00-1577, 00-1595","citation":"242 F.3d 191","date":"2001-02-22","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2967340\/dellastatious-v-williams\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. OPINION .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"2":{"name":"Remora Investments, L.L.C. v. Orr","case_number":"Record 080313.","citation":"673 S.E.2d 845","date":"2009-02-27","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1058372\/remora-investments-llc-v-orr\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 673 S.E.2d 845 (2009) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"3":{"name":"Willard v. Moneta Building Supply, Inc.","case_number":"Record 981836","citation":"515 S.E.2d 277","date":"1999-06-11","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059739\/willard-v-moneta-building-supply-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. JUSTICE KOONTZ, with whom JUSTICE HASSELL .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"4":{"name":"Wlr Foods, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc.","case_number":"Civ. A. No. 94-0012-H","citation":"155 F.R.D. 136","date":"1994-04-25","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/9045584\/wlr-foods-inc-v-tyson-foods-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. MEMORANDUM OPINION .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, W.D. Virginia"},"5":{"name":"Berman v. Physical Medicine Associates, Ltd.","case_number":"99-1043","citation":"225 F.3d 429","date":"2000-08-23","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2967261\/berman-v-physical-medicine-associates-ltd\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Affirmed by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge MICHAEL and Judge .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"6":{"name":"Matson v. Alpert (In re LandAmerica Financial Group, Inc.)","case_number":"Bankruptcy No. 08-35994; Adversary No. 11-03168","citation":"470 B.R. 759","date":"2012-03-01","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/8522215\/matson-v-alpert-in-re-landamerica-financial-group-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. MEMORANDUM OPINION .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia"},"7":{"name":"WLR Foods, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc.","case_number":"Civ. A. 94-012-H","citation":"857 F. Supp. 492","date":"1994-06-01","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2008780\/wlr-foods-inc-v-tyson-foods-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 857 F.Supp. 492 (1994) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, W.D. Virginia"},"8":{"name":"Simmons v. Miller","case_number":"Record 000785","citation":"544 S.E.2d 666","date":"2001-04-20","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1059483\/simmons-v-miller\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 544 S.E.2d 666 (2001) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"},"9":{"name":"Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner v. Matyiko","case_number":"Record 960433","citation":"481 S.E.2d 468","date":"1997-01-10","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1060097\/commonwealth-transportation-commissioner-v-matyiko\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 481 S.E.2d 468 (1997) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":346829,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-690.1","catch_line":"Director of open-end management investment company deemed disinterested","url":"\/13.1-690.1\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-690.1","metadata":false},{"id":346832,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-691","catch_line":"Director conflict of interests","url":"\/13.1-691\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-691","metadata":false},{"id":346831,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-691.1","catch_line":"Business opportunities","url":"\/13.1-691.1\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-691.1","metadata":false},{"id":346834,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-692","catch_line":"Liability for unlawful distributions","url":"\/13.1-692\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-692","metadata":false},{"id":346833,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-692.1","catch_line":"Limitation on liability of officers and directors; exception","url":"\/13.1-692.1\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-692.1","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"Nos. 91-1873, 91-1874","case_number":"332","citation":"979 F.2d 332","date":"1993-04-07","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/594712\/nos-91-1873-91-1874\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 979 F.2d 332 .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"1":{"name":"Sandberg v. Virginia Bankshares, Inc.","case_number":"Nos. 91-1873, 91-1874","citation":"979 F.2d 332","date":"1992-10-21","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/9012782\/sandberg-v-virginia-bankshares-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. OPINION .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"2":{"name":"Sandberg v. Virginia Bankshares, Inc.","case_number":"Nos. 88-2658 to 88-2660, 88-2662 to 88-2664, 89-2903, 89-2904","citation":"891 F.2d 1112","date":"1989-12-15","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/8984088\/sandberg-v-virginia-bankshares-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. K.K. HALL, Circuit Judge: .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"3":{"name":"Matson v. Alpert (In re LandAmerica Financial Group, Inc.)","case_number":"Bankruptcy No. 08-35994; Adversary No. 11-03168","citation":"470 B.R. 759","date":"2012-03-01","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/8522215\/matson-v-alpert-in-re-landamerica-financial-group-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. MEMORANDUM OPINION .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia"},"4":{"name":"Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner v. Matyiko","case_number":"Record 960433","citation":"481 S.E.2d 468","date":"1997-01-10","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1060097\/commonwealth-transportation-commissioner-v-matyiko\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 481 S.E.2d 468 (1997) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"SCV<\/abbr>"}}}},{"id":346835,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-693","catch_line":"Required officers","url":"\/13.1-693\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-693","metadata":false},{"id":346836,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-694","catch_line":"Duties of officers","url":"\/13.1-694\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-694","metadata":false},{"id":346837,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-695","catch_line":"Resignation and removal of officers","url":"\/13.1-695\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-695","metadata":{"court_decisions":""}}],"previous_section":{"id":346832,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-691","catch_line":"Director conflict of interests","url":"\/13.1-691\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-691","metadata":false},"next_section":{"id":346834,"structure_id":49791,"section_number":"13.1-692","catch_line":"Liability for unlawful distributions","url":"\/13.1-692\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-692","metadata":false},"metadata":false,"official_url":"https:\/\/law.lis.virginia.gov\/vacode\/13.1-691.1\/","history_text":"

This law was first created in 2005. The record of its establishment is cataloged in chapter 765<\/a> of that year\u2019s edition of \u201cActs of Assembly,\u201d the annual state publication listing all changes made to the Code of Virginia in that year.<\/p>","references":false,"refers_to":[{"id":346832,"section_number":"13.1-691","catch_line":"Director conflict of interests","order_by":null,"url":"\/13.1-691\/"}],"permalink":{"id":1378257,"object_type":"law","relational_id":346831,"identifier":"13.1-691.1","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-691.1","url":"\/13.1-691.1\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1},"url":"\/13.1-691.1\/","token":"13.1\/9\/9\/13.1-691.1","dublin_core":{"Title":"Business opportunities","Type":"Text","Format":"text\/html","Identifier":"\u00a7 13.1-691.1","Relation":"Code of Virginia"},"html":"\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

A.<\/span> A director’s taking advantage, directly or indirectly, of a business opportunity may not be the subject of equitable<\/span> relief, or give rise to an award of damages<\/span> or other sanctions<\/span> against the director, in a proceeding<\/span> by or in the right of the corporation<\/span> on the ground that such opportunity should have first been offered to the corporation<\/span>, if before becoming legally obligated respecting the opportunity the director brings it to the attention of the corporation<\/span> and: <\/i><\/a><\/p><\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

1.<\/span> Directors’ action disclaiming the corporation<\/span>’s interest<\/span> in the opportunity is taken in compliance with the procedures set forth in subdivision A 1 of § 13.1-691<\/a>, as if the decision being made concerned a director’s conflict of interests<\/span> transaction; or <\/i><\/a><\/p><\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

2.<\/span> Shareholders<\/span>’ action disclaiming the corporation<\/span>’s interest<\/span> in the opportunity is taken in compliance with the procedures set forth in subdivision A 2 of § 13.1-691<\/a>, as if the decision being made concerned a director’s conflict of interests<\/span> transaction. <\/i><\/a><\/p><\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

B.<\/span> In any proceeding<\/span> seeking equitable<\/span> relief or other remedies, based upon an alleged improper taking advantage of a business opportunity by a director, the fact<\/span> that the director did not employ one of the procedures described in subsection A before taking advantage of the opportunity shall not create an inference that the opportunity should have been first presented to the corporation<\/span> or alter the burden of proof<\/span> otherwise applicable to establish that the director breached a duty to the corporation<\/span> in the circumstances. <\/i><\/a><\/p><\/section>","plain_text":" CODE OF VIRGINIA\n\nBUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES (\u00a7 13.1-691.1)\n\nA. A director’s taking advantage, directly or indirectly, of a business\nopportunity may not be the subject of equitable relief, or give rise to an award\nof damages or other sanctions against the director, in a proceeding by or in the\nright of the corporation on the ground that such opportunity should have first\nbeen offered to the corporation, if before becoming legally obligated respecting\nthe opportunity the director brings it to the attention of the corporation and:\n\n 1. Directors’ action disclaiming the corporation’s interest in the\n opportunity is taken in compliance with the procedures set forth in\n subdivision A 1 of § 13.1-691, as if the decision being made concerned a\n director’s conflict of interests transaction; or\n\n 2. Shareholders’ action disclaiming the corporation’s interest in\n the opportunity is taken in compliance with the procedures set forth in\n subdivision A 2 of § 13.1-691, as if the decision being made concerned a\n director’s conflict of interests transaction.\n\nB. In any proceeding seeking equitable relief or other remedies, based upon an\nalleged improper taking advantage of a business opportunity by a director, the\nfact that the director did not employ one of the procedures described in\nsubsection A before taking advantage of the opportunity shall not create an\ninference that the opportunity should have been first presented to the\ncorporation or alter the burden of proof otherwise applicable to establish that\nthe director breached a duty to the corporation in the circumstances.\n\nHISTORY: 2005, c. 765.","edition":{"id":2,"name":"2026","slug":"2026","date_created":"2026-07-16 18:40:23","date_modified":"2026-08-02 15:14:36","current":1,"order_by":2,"last_import":"2026-08-02 12:37:30"}}