{"formats":[{"name":"JSON","format":"json","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-json\/1-8.json"},{"name":"Plain Text","format":"text","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-text\/1-8.txt"},{"name":"XML","format":"xml","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-xml\/1-8.xml"},{"name":"HTML","format":"html","url":"\/downloads\/2026\/code-html\/1-8.html"}],"law_id":345312,"edition_id":2,"section_id":345312,"structure_id":49572,"section_number":"1-8","catch_line":"Notice, recognizance or process given, taken or issued before Code in force","history":"Code 1919, \u00a7 6570; R. P. 1948, \u00a7 1-8.","full_text":"Although a notice, recognizance or process shall have been given, taken or issued before the day prescribed for the commencement of this Code, or of any provisions of this Code, it may, nevertheless, be given, taken or returnable to a day after such commencement, or to a court established by this Code or the clerk&#8217;s office of such court, in like manner as if this Code had commenced before the same was given, taken, or issued.\n\n","order_by":null,"text":{"0":{"id":1287376,"text":"Although a notice, recognizance or process shall have been given, taken or issued before the day prescribed for the commencement of this Code, or of any provisions of this Code, it may, nevertheless, be given, taken or returnable to a day after such commencement, or to a court established by this Code or the clerk&#8217;s office of such court, in like manner as if this Code had commenced before the same was given, taken, or issued.","type":"section","prefixes":[""],"prefix":"","entire_prefix":"","prefix_anchor":"","level":1}},"ancestry":[{"id":49572,"edition_id":2,"name":"Code of Virginia","identifier":"1","label":"chapter","depth":2,"order_by":1,"parent_id":49571,"metadata":{"child_laws":10,"child_structures":0},"date_created":"2026-08-02 02:11:27","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:26:43","permalink":{"id":1369803,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":49572,"identifier":"1","token":"1\/1","url":"\/1\/1\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}},{"id":49571,"edition_id":2,"name":"General Provisions","identifier":"1","label":"title","depth":1,"order_by":1,"parent_id":null,"metadata":{"child_laws":122,"child_structures":12},"date_created":"2026-08-02 02:11:27","date_modified":"2026-08-02 12:26:43","permalink":{"id":1369801,"object_type":"structure","relational_id":49571,"identifier":"1","token":"1","url":"\/1\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1}}],"structure_contents":[{"id":345192,"structure_id":49572,"section_number":"1-1","catch_line":"Contents and designation of Code","url":"\/1-1\/","token":"1\/1\/1-1","metadata":false},{"id":345196,"structure_id":49572,"section_number":"1-2","catch_line":"Effective date of Code","url":"\/1-2\/","token":"1\/1\/1-2","metadata":false},{"id":345195,"structure_id":49572,"section_number":"1-2.1","catch_line":"Effective date of certain provisions","url":"\/1-2.1\/","token":"1\/1\/1-2.1","metadata":false},{"id":345260,"structure_id":49572,"section_number":"1-3","catch_line":"Repeal of acts of a general nature","url":"\/1-3\/","token":"1\/1\/1-3","metadata":false},{"id":345275,"structure_id":49572,"section_number":"1-4","catch_line":"Effect of such repeal generally; effect of revision or amendment of state Constitution","url":"\/1-4\/","token":"1\/1\/1-4","metadata":false},{"id":345285,"structure_id":49572,"section_number":"1-5","catch_line":"Effect of such repeal as to persons in office","url":"\/1-5\/","token":"1\/1\/1-5","metadata":false},{"id":345299,"structure_id":49572,"section_number":"1-6","catch_line":"Effect of repeal of validating statutes","url":"\/1-6\/","token":"1\/1\/1-6","metadata":false},{"id":345311,"structure_id":49572,"section_number":"1-7","catch_line":"Acts passed between certain dates not affected","url":"\/1-7\/","token":"1\/1\/1-7","metadata":false},{"id":345312,"structure_id":49572,"section_number":"1-8","catch_line":"Notice, recognizance or process given, taken or issued before Code in force","url":"\/1-8\/","token":"1\/1\/1-8","metadata":false},{"id":345313,"structure_id":49572,"section_number":"1-9","catch_line":"Pending cases; parties; where books, records and papers to remain","url":"\/1-9\/","token":"1\/1\/1-9","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"United States v. Richard Allen Jackson","case_number":"01-9","citation":"327 F.3d 273","date":"2003-03-18","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/781737\/united-states-v-richard-allen-jackson\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Affirmed by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote an opinion, Parts I, IV and XVI of which Judge .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"1":{"name":"Armstrong v. Green","case_number":"No. 11-6021","citation":"414 F. App'x 535","date":"2011-03-03","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/8466096\/armstrong-v-green\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"2":{"name":"Cerquera v. Supervalue, Inc.","case_number":"1:09-mj-00829","citation":"715 F. Supp. 2d 682","date":"2010-05-25","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2542522\/cerquera-v-supervalue-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 715 F.Supp.2d 682 (2010) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"3":{"name":"Matarese v. Archstone Pentagon City","case_number":"1:09-mj-00857","citation":"761 F. Supp. 2d 346","date":"2011-01-05","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2472222\/matarese-v-archstone-pentagon-city\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 761 F.Supp.2d 346 (2011) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"4":{"name":"Matarese v. ARCHSTONE PENTAGON CITY","case_number":"1:09-mj-00857","citation":"795 F. Supp. 2d 402","date":"2011-05-31","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2116742\/matarese-v-archstone-pentagon-city\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 795 F.Supp.2d 402 (2011) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"5":{"name":"Moore-King v. COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VA.","case_number":"1:09-mj-00804","citation":"819 F. Supp. 2d 604","date":"2011-09-30","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2175857\/moore-king-v-county-of-chesterfield-va\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 819 F.Supp.2d 604 (2011) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"6":{"name":"First American Title Insurance v. First Alliance Title, Inc.","case_number":"1:09-mj-00403","citation":"718 F. Supp. 2d 669","date":"2010-06-14","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2540648\/first-american-title-insurance-v-first-alliance-title-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 718 F.Supp.2d 669 (2010) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"7":{"name":"United States v. Forstell","case_number":"1:09-cv-00564","citation":"656 F. Supp. 2d 578","date":"2009-08-18","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1394173\/united-states-v-forstell\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 656 F.Supp.2d 578 (2009) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"8":{"name":"WELLS FARGO FUNDING v. Gold","case_number":"1:09-mj-00817","citation":"432 B.R. 216","date":"2009-11-24","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1812426\/wells-fargo-funding-v-gold\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 432 B.R. 216 (2009) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"9":{"name":"Parham v. HSBC Mortgage Corp.","case_number":"1:09-cv-00832","citation":"826 F. Supp. 2d 906","date":"2011-06-15","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2115590\/parham-v-hsbc-mortgage-corp\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 826 F.Supp.2d 906 (2011) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"}}}}],"previous_section":{"id":345311,"structure_id":49572,"section_number":"1-7","catch_line":"Acts passed between certain dates not affected","url":"\/1-7\/","token":"1\/1\/1-7","metadata":false},"next_section":{"id":345313,"structure_id":49572,"section_number":"1-9","catch_line":"Pending cases; parties; where books, records and papers to remain","url":"\/1-9\/","token":"1\/1\/1-9","metadata":{"court_decisions":{"0":{"name":"United States v. Richard Allen Jackson","case_number":"01-9","citation":"327 F.3d 273","date":"2003-03-18","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/781737\/united-states-v-richard-allen-jackson\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Affirmed by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote an opinion, Parts I, IV and XVI of which Judge .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"1":{"name":"Armstrong v. Green","case_number":"No. 11-6021","citation":"414 F. App'x 535","date":"2011-03-03","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/8466096\/armstrong-v-green\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit"},"2":{"name":"Cerquera v. Supervalue, Inc.","case_number":"1:09-mj-00829","citation":"715 F. Supp. 2d 682","date":"2010-05-25","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2542522\/cerquera-v-supervalue-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 715 F.Supp.2d 682 (2010) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"3":{"name":"Matarese v. Archstone Pentagon City","case_number":"1:09-mj-00857","citation":"761 F. Supp. 2d 346","date":"2011-01-05","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2472222\/matarese-v-archstone-pentagon-city\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 761 F.Supp.2d 346 (2011) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"4":{"name":"Matarese v. ARCHSTONE PENTAGON CITY","case_number":"1:09-mj-00857","citation":"795 F. Supp. 2d 402","date":"2011-05-31","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2116742\/matarese-v-archstone-pentagon-city\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 795 F.Supp.2d 402 (2011) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"5":{"name":"Moore-King v. COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VA.","case_number":"1:09-mj-00804","citation":"819 F. Supp. 2d 604","date":"2011-09-30","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2175857\/moore-king-v-county-of-chesterfield-va\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 819 F.Supp.2d 604 (2011) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"6":{"name":"First American Title Insurance v. First Alliance Title, Inc.","case_number":"1:09-mj-00403","citation":"718 F. Supp. 2d 669","date":"2010-06-14","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2540648\/first-american-title-insurance-v-first-alliance-title-inc\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 718 F.Supp.2d 669 (2010) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"7":{"name":"United States v. Forstell","case_number":"1:09-cv-00564","citation":"656 F. Supp. 2d 578","date":"2009-08-18","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1394173\/united-states-v-forstell\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 656 F.Supp.2d 578 (2009) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"8":{"name":"WELLS FARGO FUNDING v. Gold","case_number":"1:09-mj-00817","citation":"432 B.R. 216","date":"2009-11-24","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/1812426\/wells-fargo-funding-v-gold\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 432 B.R. 216 (2009) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"},"9":{"name":"Parham v. HSBC Mortgage Corp.","case_number":"1:09-cv-00832","citation":"826 F. Supp. 2d 906","date":"2011-06-15","url":"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/opinion\/2115590\/parham-v-hsbc-mortgage-corp\/","abstract":" .\u202f.\u202f. 826 F.Supp.2d 906 (2011) .\u202f.\u202f. ","court_html":"District Court, E.D. Virginia"}}}},"metadata":false,"official_url":"https:\/\/law.lis.virginia.gov\/vacode\/1-8\/","history_text":false,"references":false,"refers_to":false,"permalink":{"id":1369837,"object_type":"law","relational_id":345312,"identifier":"1-8","token":"1\/1\/1-8","url":"\/1-8\/","edition_id":2,"permalink":0,"preferred":1},"url":"\/1-8\/","token":"1\/1\/1-8","dublin_core":{"Title":"Notice, recognizance or process given, taken or issued before Code in force","Type":"Text","Format":"text\/html","Identifier":"\u00a7 1-8","Relation":"Code of Virginia"},"html":"\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section><p>Although a notice, <span class=\"dictionary\">recognizance<\/span> or process shall have been given, taken or issued before the day prescribed for the commencement of this Code, or of any provisions of this Code, it may, nevertheless, be given, taken or returnable to a day after such commencement, or to a <span class=\"dictionary\">court<\/span> established by this Code or the clerk&#8217;s office of such <span class=\"dictionary\">court<\/span>, in like manner as if this Code had commenced before the same was given, taken, or issued.<\/p><\/section>","plain_text":"                                 CODE OF VIRGINIA\n\nNOTICE, RECOGNIZANCE OR PROCESS GIVEN, TAKEN OR ISSUED BEFORE CODE IN FORCE (\u00a7\n1-8)\n\nAlthough a notice, recognizance or process shall have been given, taken or\nissued before the day prescribed for the commencement of this Code, or of any\nprovisions of this Code, it may, nevertheless, be given, taken or returnable to\na day after such commencement, or to a court established by this Code or the\nclerk&#8217;s office of such court, in like manner as if this Code had commenced\nbefore the same was given, taken, or issued.\n\nHISTORY: Code 1919, \u00a7 6570; R. P. 1948, \u00a7 1-8.","edition":{"id":2,"name":"2026","slug":"2026","date_created":"2026-07-16 18:40:23","date_modified":"2026-08-02 15:14:36","current":1,"order_by":2,"last_import":"2026-08-02 12:37:30"}}